FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2002, 09:33 AM   #11
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by hezekiahjones:
<strong>

Plus I think his numerous porn video rental receipts are kicking around somewhere.</strong>
After the Senate confirmation hearing on Thomas' appointment (the "high tech lynching"), a law was passed making your video rental records private, as private as the confessional.

I don't know of an opinion by Thomas outlining his theories, but I think he has given some speeches or written articles on "natural law". I'm too nauseated at the thought to try to look for them.
Toto is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 10:19 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Toto:
After the Senate confirmation hearing on Thomas' appointment (the "high tech lynching"), a law was passed making your video rental records private, as private as the confessional.
Thank god. I rented Dazed and Confused once.
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 11:59 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 1,792
Post

I'm not sure if Thomas has ever authored an opinion.

I have heard that he very rarely, if ever, asks a questions during arguments.
GaryP is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 02:16 PM   #14
Beloved Deceased
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: central Florida
Posts: 3,546
Post

I found this an interesting read, not so much because it provided any new insights into Justice Thomas, but because of the organization that produced it.

<a href="http://www.claremont.org/publications/morel1.cfm" target="_blank">http://www.claremont.org/publications/morel1.cfm</a>

After reviewing the article, click on the "About Us" and discover the new kind of slick cover statement of a religious right wing organization.
Try to find any mention of religion or Christianity. It is the same kind of verbage being used by the "Intelligent Design" advocates. These are highly educated, intellectual, professional, well organized, funded and led supporters of a "Christan Nation" persuasion. (Note how they mention the "Heritage Foundation.")
Buffman is offline  
Old 05-17-2002, 04:29 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: WI
Posts: 4,357
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by GaryP:
I'm not sure if Thomas has ever authored an opinion.
Lots. Although I have a feeling Thomas' clerks are among the hardest working people in Washington. Here's a nifty page from polisci.com:

<a href="http://www.polisci.com/almanac/judicial/justice/thomas.htm" target="_blank">Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice</a>

Note the extremely high correlation between Thomas and Scalia.

Quote:
I have heard that he very rarely, if ever, asks a questions during arguments.
I think this is true. I don't think he answered too many questions at his nomination hearings either.
hezekiah jones is offline  
Old 05-18-2002, 07:56 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 571
Wink

Quote:
Originally posted by Veil of Fire:
<strong>
Is this a widely-held belief among Christians??? If so, I'm buying a gun. A big gun. And a big dog. And a home security system. With big guns.</strong>
Your gun won't be effective. Remember, anytine a Christian is shot it a Bible of a cross will always stop it.
The Resistance is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 01:24 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,107
Post

Gary P quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have heard that he very rarely, if ever, asks a questions during arguments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HJ
I think this is true. I don't think he answered too many questions at his nomination hearings either.

True. I read that while visiting a public school Thomas explained to the kids why he never spoke during court sessions. He said that he was self conscious about his speech as a kid from a lower class background and so was reluctant to speak out. That's why now he's silent in court. Lordy, if the man had been under oath, he'd have perjured himself again, right in front of the children.
Oresta is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 03:25 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,107
Post

First,
A corrected account of my poor recollection of Thomas' explanation for his silence in court.

<a href="http://members.aol.com/alicebeard/thoughts/thomas.html" target="_blank">http://members.aol.com/alicebeard/thoughts/thomas.html</a>

Quote:
He further explained that he had not asked questions in high school, in college, or in law school. "When I was asked a question, I answered it, but I did not ask questions." He explained that he had grown up in a rural area in the South where there remained a major influence of an African language. As he grew up, many in that area spoke a mixture of English and this old language. As a consequence, while he learned to speak standard English-only, he would edit his speech and his words in his brain before speaking. This encouraged him to do more listening than speaking.
My bias is showing as to how I remembered this account.

And here we have Thomas writing a majority opinion and managing to rationalize his way to breach in the Church and State wall in the Good News Club v. Milford Central High School case.

<a href="http://w3.trib.com/FACT/1st.lev.sctongoodnewsclub.html" target="_blank">http://w3.trib.com/FACT/1st.lev.sctongoodnewsclub.html</a>

This is, an ad hoc, hasty search to support my above assertion. I admit, my evaluation of Thomas on the Establishment Clause is an impressionist one, based on his shadowing of Scalia's hostile posture toward much of what has been traditionally protected by the First Amendment.
Oresta is offline  
Old 05-19-2002, 06:11 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lancaster, OH
Posts: 1,792
Post

Oresta-- (or anybody else)--

Do you know how that "Good News Club" ruling affects teacher participation?

I think I remember a piece about it on NPR in which the principal of the school was talking with the guy who organized the club. The principal knew him because the organizer is also a substitute teacher who sometimes works in the building where these club meetings were to take place.

I'm interested because in my town, the school allows a principal and teachers to participate in the "See you At the Pole" ritual. They have promised that it would be "well before or well after" the school day. The last two years this has meant about 45 minutes.
GaryP is offline  
Old 05-22-2002, 09:45 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Posts: 17,432
Post

Welcome to Maryland, and we are supposed to be one of the more liberal states. cripes in Baltimore, there is practically a church on every freakin' corner.
nogods4me is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.