FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-07-2003, 02:23 PM   #101
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: between cultures merging
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by John Page
I saw a list of words that described 4 instances of truths put forward by you. Please indicate the "one truth" you claim exists.

I tried that years ago - conclusion, the dictionary defines words in terms of other words.

Cheers, John
John, it's already been indicated, but, just for you, here it is one more time.

The "one truth" is "truth" itself.

Your particular belief system is what is limiting your ability to see.

Your underwear is showing.

The answer you are looking for is already here, you just don't see it. Go back in this thread and find it. What you seek, you shall find... IF you really care to open your mind and look for it. Hand holding only goes so far. At a certain point, you just have to go it alone.
Tazz10m is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 02:39 PM   #102
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default

Hi Y!
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
That may not be your intention, but it seems to me an inescapable consequence of your position.
There are many minds. There are many truths. What may be true for one mind may not be true for another. How is this idealism?
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Well now, if I could show you such a truth, it could hardly exist outside the mind, could it?

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Leaving the mind of God out of it, it was true that gamma rays existed before anyone knew they did.
There is evidence that gamma rays did, but the truth of the existence of gamma rays did not.
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
From dictionary.com:
truth:
5.
a. Reality; actuality.
b. often Truth That which is considered to be the supreme reality and to have the ultimate meaning and value of existence.


Now if we use definition a, it seems that in this example we have a truth which existed outside the mind. If we use b, it seems that meaning cannot exist in a vacuum, in which case your position would be correct. So I guess the question I have is why we shoud use b rather than a.
Even with a., the dictionary is saying that truth, reality and actuality are all words that refer to the same thing. This is not inconsistent with one's truth being one's reality.
In b., truth is expanded to some notion of universal truth. This doesn't make sense to me because we all believe different things.

Cheers, John
John Page is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 02:42 PM   #103
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
John, it's already been indicated, but, just for you, here it is one more time.

The "one truth" is "truth" itself.
And, one more time, truth itself is what? True? How can you tell etc.?
Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
Your particular belief system is what is limiting your ability to see.
And my belief system is what?
Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
Your underwear is showing.
Maybe true for you, but false for me.

Your turn.

Cheers, John
John Page is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 03:11 PM   #104
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default Re: Truth

Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
Truth, is Truth, based upon itself, Truth.
Truth is based on whatever system of telling the truth has been applied, not "itself".
Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
Truth does not change based upon what some man says.
So you say.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
Truth is proven by factual evidence, Truth.
What system of proof do you propose?
Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
Truth only believes Truth.
Truth is something that believes itself?

Tazz:
I'm not trying to prove one of us is wrong and the other right. I'm on my journey of philosophical discovery as much as anyone else and I certainly don't have a monopoly on the truth.

However, I am having difficulty understanding your position in a clear and consistent manner. I need a little more than bon mots in order to respond with more credulity.

Cheers, John
John Page is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 03:33 PM   #105
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by John Page
Even with a., the dictionary is saying that truth, reality and actuality are all words that refer to the same thing. This is not inconsistent with one's truth being one's reality.
If there is a reality which is independent of anyone's perception of it, and it is that reality which the dictionary refers to, it is entirely inconsistent with that idea, as it then follows logically that truth is independent of anyone's perception.

Quote:
In b., truth is expanded to some notion of universal truth. This doesn't make sense to me because we all believe different things.
But not all the different things we believe are true. If I believe in Allah, and there is no such thing as Allah, that belief is not my truth, but my lie, even though I call it a truth.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 03:44 PM   #106
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southwest USA
Posts: 4,093
Default Re: Truth

Quote:
Originally posted by Tazz10m
What do you all think of this:

Truth is that which is in fact correct. Truth is idependent of "religion","philosophies", or belief systems. People can believe anything they want, but that does not change Truth one bit. People can make religions, just like they come up with philosophies, just like they come up with laws, which are all based upon their beliefs, but they are not necessarily based upon actual, factual, provable, Truth.

A Christian, saying something is Truth, does not make it Truth.
A Jew, saying something is Truth, does not make it Truth.
A Buddist, saying something is Truth, does not make it Truth.
A Judge, saying something is Truth, does not make it Truth.
A Doctor, saying something is Truth, does not make it Truth.
An Expert, saying something is Truth, does not make it Truth.

Truth, is Truth, based upon itself, Truth.
Truth does not change based upon what some man says.
Truth is proven by factual evidence, Truth.
Truth is not proven by someones religion saying it is.
Truth is not whatever is convenient to believe at the moment.
Truth is Truth, and belief is belief, but they are not necessarily the same.
Truth is Truth, and religion is religion, but they are not necessarily the same.

People can believe anything they want.
Truth only believes Truth.
Truth is true.
Truth is Truth.
1=1.
Truth.
I disagree. I don't believe that truth and the Truth are the same thing. I don't think that the Truth is always true.

I think the Truth is in the heart of the beholder. If a person is not lying it can be said that he or she is telling the Truth, yet if what they are saying is not a fact, they are not lying, they are simply mistaken.
Tristan Scott is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 04:45 PM   #107
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
If there is a reality which is independent of anyone's perception of it, and it is that reality which the dictionary refers to, it is entirely inconsistent with that idea, as it then follows logically that truth is independent of anyone's perception.
What kind of logic are you using here?

The truth is that a human can think that <input any staement whatsoever> is either true or false.

Where is this substance "truth" that you seem to propose is independent of anyone's perception?
Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
But not all the different things we believe are true. If I believe in Allah, and there is no such thing as Allah, that belief is not my truth, but my lie, even though I call it a truth.
Good god! Does this mean that Allah was lying?

Cheers. John
John Page is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 05:21 PM   #108
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by John Page
What kind of logic are you using here?
P1: Truth = reality (by definition a. above)
P2: Reality is independent of anyone's perception of it.

C: Truth is independent of anyone's perception of it.

Where is the flaw?

If you object to P2, it appears your alternative is to believe that reality is dependent on how it is perceived; but people who are spaced out on LSD cannot, in fact, fly, despite their perception to the contrary. The sun did not revolve around the earth because people thought that it did.

Quote:
The truth is that a human can think that <input any staement whatsoever> is either true or false.

Where is this substance "truth" that you seem to propose is independent of anyone's perception?
Substitute "reality" for "truth" and it seems you have your answer, unless you think there is no substance to reality.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-07-2003, 05:40 PM   #109
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: between cultures merging
Posts: 17
Default Re: Re: Truth

Quote:
Originally posted by Tristan Scott
I disagree. I don't believe that truth and the Truth are the same thing. I don't think that the Truth is always true.

I think the Truth is in the heart of the beholder. If a person is not lying it can be said that he or she is telling the Truth, yet if what they are saying is not a fact, they are not lying, they are simply mistaken.
If what a person is saying is not fact, and they are not lying, and they are simply mistaken, they still may be telling what they believe to be the truth, but yet, what they are telling, and believing, is not the truth about a matter or issue. The truth is whatever it is, whether we see it or know of it or not.

If someone is telling the truth to the best of their knowledge, belief, and understanding, they are speaking truthfully, and speaking the truth to the best of their ability at the moment, but they for sure are not lying.

The truth is always true, regardless of how it is spelled, or which letters are capitalized.

If the truth becomes mixed with elements that are not true, then is no longer 100 percent true/truth, but has become "partially true/partial truth". No different than taking 100 percent pure water and mixing it with something else. It becomes impure.
Tazz10m is offline  
Old 07-08-2003, 07:14 AM   #110
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: On the road to extinction. . .
Posts: 1,485
Default

Tazz10m,

Truth is a light, and when held out in front, all things can be seen in all directions. That which may be hidden, will soon be revealed, as light gets around.


very poetic but you are using a philosophical basket.


Tristan Scott: Truth is proven by factual evidence, Truth.
However to have factual evidence one must have truth. So if I were to rewrite what you said it would sound like :
Truth is proven by truth.

Now this is not a bad tautlogical statement. To have truth one must have truth. Truth is truth. However the philosopher's problem is uncovering the truth. Mabye we should blame the creator for making truth so difficult to access.
sophie is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.