![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Everywhere... I'm Watching you...
Posts: 1,019
|
![]()
If they can transplant them on the street, I'd say cloning eyeballs would be a possibility.
My main beef with minority report was how a human's death is so special to the space-time continuum. My guess is because the pre-cognitives were human, so they only see things concerning humans, or some weird vague psychic pseudo-sciencey stuff like that... |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlantic coast--US
Posts: 99
|
![]()
Newby here, tip toeing into the discussion.
It seems if we look hard enough, almost any movie has some point to nitpick about. Whether it bothers me or not depends on the context. Does the flaw invalidate the whole film (which happened for me in Minority Report)? Film is all about suspension of disbelief, anyway. The whole premise of MR is BS, but sets, direction, characters, etc., were enough to remove that from the center of my attention. From another perspective--is it a bug or a feature? |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: U.S.
Posts: 4,171
|
![]() Quote:
DC |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 3,647
|
![]() Quote:
Duck! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
![]()
Duck, that was my thought exactly when watching the Matrix. "If they'd of used cows instead of humans, none of this BS would be necessary!"
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Alaska, USA
Posts: 1,535
|
![]()
Perhaps we'll learn in subsequent sequels that the "power plant" hypothesis is wrong. Why should any information about what the Machine really needs be correct?
I rather favor the "Servants Out of Control" concept -- Man creates Machine to take care of every need. Machine obeys too well. I nominate the continuity blip in Star Trek II when we see Chekov and Terrell on the bridge of Reliant after they were supposedly left behind on Regula One. Oops. But it doesn't ruin the movie, especially if you close your eyes during that scene. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 2,029
|
![]() Quote:
I think they could have justified it by saying that all large animals went extinct during the initial war between man and the AIs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 6,997
|
![]() Quote:
"Legolas is a sexy bitch and he can do whatever he wants!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 1,230
|
![]()
Speaking of Star Trek II (which is still by far the best "Trek" movie), the way that Khan was able to cripple the Enterprise really bugs me.
Okay, Kirk is supposed to be an experienced and highly competent Starfleet officer, right? So, when the Reliant approaches the Enterprise and refuses communication, does Kirk do the sensible thing and raise the shields? No, he doesn't. Even after Saavik warns him that this is standard procedure under the circumstances, Kirk doesn't order the shields to be raised. Then they receive a message from the Reliant that their chamber coil has overloaded; Spock scans the Reliant and discovers that the Reliant's chamber coil emissions are normal. At this point, Kirk not only knows that the Reliant is approaching on what appears to be an attack vector, he knows that they're lying about being unable to communicate. Does he raise the shields? No, he doesn't. Then the Reliant raises its shields, clearly adopting an aggressive posture. Does Kirk order the shields to be raised? No he doesn't! It isn't until the Reliant actually locks phasers on the Enterprise that Kirk thinks to raise the shields -- by which time it's far too late. *** If the Star Trek movies were at all realistic, Star Trek III would have been about Kirk's court-martial and dismissal from Starfleet for gross negligence of duty, failure to obey regulations, and multiple counts of involuntary manslaughter. Cheers, Michael |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
|
![]()
damnit, Michael
Until I read your post Star Trek 2 was by far my favorite star trek movie, and you just ruined it. What the hell is oging to be my favorite now, 4,3,1 they all blew and you ruined the really good one thanks a fucking lot. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|