FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2003, 11:48 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,112
Default

Muslim Woman Must Drop Veil for Florida License

Quote:
MIAMI (Reuters) - A Muslim woman who cited religious reasons in refusing to remove her veil for a driver's license photo must show her face for the camera if she wants her license reinstated, a Florida judge ruled on Friday.

In a case that pitted claims of religious freedom against security concerns, Circuit Judge Janet Thorpe ruled that Florida has a compelling interest in identifying drivers during traffic stops and that photo images are essential to promote that interest.
Jewel is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 12:11 PM   #22
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Default Re: photograph on drivers license violating right to practice religious beliefs??? WHAT!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Cathy Kopasek
How and why was this law suit allowed to be disputed in a court of law?
The First Amendment from the Bill of Rights forbids Congress (and through the 14th amendment, the states) from passing any laws "...abridging... the right of the people ... to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

What kind of justice would be obtained if any case could be arbitrarily tossed out before any court hears it, just because a court clerk thinks it's silly?
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 06-14-2003, 10:00 AM   #23
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Los Angeles area
Posts: 40,549
Default

The wrap up:

Islam and the Unveiled Photograph

Quote:
. . .

But what still puzzled Khaled Abou El Fadl, a professor of Islamic law at the University of California at Los Angeles School of Law who had been a witness for the government, was why it had been so difficult to get any other Muslims to admit that the government had a plausible case.

Although the evidence wasn't permitted in court, the woman, Sultaana Freeman, was convicted of aggravated battery in Illinois, The Chicago Tribune reported, in the beating of her twin 3-year-old foster children. According to police reports, child welfare workers said she invoked religious modesty to hinder investigators from looking under the children's Muslim garb, where one daughter had a broken arm, and both were covered with bruises. The mother's mug shot was taken without a veil. At any rate, even religious pilgrims to Mecca have to have uncovered faces in their passport photographs.

So why, Mr. Fadl asked, was this case given such widespread support in the Muslim communities? And why was his cross-examination so "bizarre," he wondered, as it had focused solely on whether he was sufficiently orthodox in his own religious beliefs. What the American Muslim culture seemed to be demanding, as he described it, was absolute loyalty to an extreme position.
Toto is offline  
Old 06-14-2003, 05:57 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Austin and Loving it.
Posts: 14
Default

couldn't she just take a bus, isn't the government funding public transportation for a reason?
Nocturn is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.