FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2003, 12:22 PM   #31
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Bob K
See: http://www.faithfreedom.org/index.htm

Title: This site is created by ex-Muslims to help Muslims leave Islam_

Subtitle: Islam is a lie and this site is the proof

Here is a listing of the negatives in the Koran that suggest it could not have been written/inspired/dictated/etc. by gods:

http://main.faithfreedom.org/Article.../prologue2.htm

Herein Deists write about Islam/The Koran:

http://www.deism.com/islam.htm

Herein Secular Humanists write about Islam/The Koran:

http://www.secularhumanism.org/wtc.htm#_ftnref1

Whats the point of these websites. I mean I could have just as easily directed you to jewsforallah.org a website made by ex-Jews who are now convinced of the authenticity of the Holy Qur'an. And quite frankly, Secular Humanism is sooo yesterday.
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 12:26 PM   #32
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Wounded King
I have heard several times from people promoting 'Islamic science' sites about the wonderful fact that the Qur'an describes embryological stages.

As far as I can tell the passages covering this are in some cases clearly inaccurate and in other cases could be derived simply from gross morphological observation or previous works on embryology, such as those of the greeks.

Actually you are spreading misinformation. I am currently a medical student and our Anatomy textbook is writted by world leading embryologist Keith Moore, Phd, FIAC..etc....well he verified that the Qur'an's account is accurate, probably more so than scientific terminology. Well, anyways do you want me to trust a layman who critiques whatever he can get his hands on or say , the person who actually " wrote the book" i.e Keith Moore?
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 12:29 PM   #33
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Cretinist
Holy - 10 times
Lies - 10 times

Lying - 8 times
Muslims - 8 times

Proof: http://www.hti.umich.edu/k/koran/simple.html

This is plain wrong. You are using an english Transliteration. i.e I could interpret the arabic word for " Holy" as "devout" or some other word as "pious". They are not exactly the same. Please use the Original Arabic ( for authenticity purposes). Thank You
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 12:30 PM   #34
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by simian
Seems to me that either the only time "eblees" occurs is in "esteazah min eblees", or that possibly creative counting is used.

As for the Koran and reproduction, I did run across an analysis of some of the "advanced scientific knowledge in the Koran". It appears that Mohummad believed a man's "seed" was produced in the kidneys - exactly what the greeks thought, and predating the Koran.

Simian

No, there are no verses in the Qur'an indicating the word kidneys.
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 12:40 PM   #35
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by echidna
River, I don’t see many obvious 19’s there. Don’t you believe that the Qu’ran is proved by the supposed recurrence of 19 ? I would have expected that for any real mathematical significance, the recurrences should have occurred in multiples of 19.

The number 19 argument is very complex. It definitely occurs way too often to be dictated by chance. However, I have not included the number 19 argument (yet), for it is difficult to confirm unless you have a computer.

Also, the 19 argument is quite different from other numerological arguments dealing with say the Bible and Torah...these often concentrate on "sets of numbers" . I find the number 19 argument fascinating, and I was hoping to find a website that expresses it without getting carried away (i.e reading numbers vertically and horizontally).

Thirdly, the researcher that first discovered the Code 19 system declared himself " the consolidating Prophet of the Covenant" and later got shot in the head for his heresy. His arguments were solid for the most part. Except he wanted to omit two verses of the Qur'an to fit his coded system perfectly. Years later additional researchers discovered that the Code works even better (with even more coded -19 strains) if all verses are kept intact.

Peace
River
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 12:55 PM   #36
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Muad'Dib
That's my question--proof of what?

Yes, those patterns are neat, but are we supposed to conclude something from them? I wouldn't be surprised to find similar patterns in Alice in Wonderland, as Lewis Carroll was a mathematician who adored word games.

Well Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was not a mathematician and it is impossible for such mathematical polarities to appear....especially if we consider the fact that the Revelation was revealed piecemeal. If the Revelation came down overnight, they would have some flexibility ....but I doubt it

Secondly, its kinda weird but people give the Prophet even more credit...

For example, How did he correct the account of Noah's Flood in a manner to match archaelogy . The Qur'an states that the Flood as being Local. Was Muhammad an archaeologist? No

How did the Prophet know that plants have gender? was the Prophet also , a botanist? No

How did the Prophet learn of the Big Bang, That the Universe was made from smoke in its infancy...that the Oceans will once again boil over...that countless stars will die? Was he an astronomer or time traveler? No


Why does the Qur'an say that Islam will oneday be the largest religion in the world ? That verse was revealed when the prophet had only a handful of followers. Now Islam has 1.6 billion adherents and by 2020 it will be the largest religion in the world with 33% population.

Was Muhammad a Prophet and Messenger of G-d ? Yes.
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 12:55 PM   #37
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO area
Posts: 1,924
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by River
No, there are no verses in the Qur'an indicating the word kidneys.
It appears you are correct the verse (one of the verses?) in question does not specifically say kidney, however:

Quote:
I3vii: Creation
Sura 86:5-7 tells us that man is created from a gushing fluid that issues from between the loins and the ribs. Therefore, in this sura we find that the semen which creates a child originates from the back or kidney of the male and not the testicles.
From: http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/quran.htm#I3

I am a bit annoyed with myself I didn't bookmark the other sites I had found the last time I was dealing with science and islam.

To put it bluntly, I find the Koran to be every bit as reliable as the bible when it comes to science (which is to say not at all).

Why do I get the feeling the next response I get will be either 1)inaccurate translation or 2)poetic liberty?

Simian
simian is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 01:03 PM   #38
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

That verse is somewhat generalized but anatomically correct. I will address that verse.

However, many other verses that describe scientific phenomena in the Qur'an tend to be very specific.
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 01:07 PM   #39
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 3,680
Default

Al-Tariq 86: 6 –7 may be translated into simple English as:

“Man should consider what it is that he has been created from. He is created from water (fluid) spurting forth, emanating from a place between the (lower) back and the (lower) ribs.”


The "lower" is placed in parenthesis because the Qur'an doesnt' specify and neither does it preclude this possibility.


Even though the male sperm is formed in the testes, the blood supply which, is an essential factor to the making of the sperm comes from between the ribs and the back.


The words of the Qur’an are not scientifically invalid, as the words “emanating from a place between the (lower) back and the (lower) ribs”, do not necessarily imply “emanating in its final shape” only, but can also cover “initial emanation”.


Why are the words “Bayen al-Sulb wa al-Taraayib” (i.e. ‘between the ribs and the back’) used in the Qur'an rather than the phrase “Bayena shayin wa shayin” (i.e. between one thing and another) ?

Upon closer inspection of the verse :

Qur’an (Al-Tariq 86: 6 – 8) says:

“Man should consider what it is that he has been created from. He is created from water (fluid) spurting forth, emanating from a place between the (lower) back and the (lower) ribs. Indeed He [i.e. God] is fully capable of returning him [to life].”


He/she came from a fluid gushing forth, emanating from a place, (not worth mentioning), between the ribs and the back. And yet man behaves with overbearing pride concerning the Day of Judgment. Indeed, God, Who created him the first time, is fully capable of returning him back to life. This theme is also demonstrated here.


[ Noble Qur'an Chapter: 50, Verse: 47]
When we are dead and have become dust and bones
Shall then we indeed be raised again?

[ Noble Qur'an Chapter: 75, Verses: 3 & 4]
Man thinks that, We shall not assemble his bones
Yes Truly! We are able to restore his very fingers!

[Noble Qur'an Chapter: 22, Verse: 7]
The Hour will come there is no doubt
And Allah will raise those who are in the graves.

The Qur'an is an Elegant, Pristine text. There is no direct mention of "penis/vagina" here. Euphemestic allusions are employed. No stories of rape, or incest. People who read or recite the Qur'an do so in a Purified state . A Holy Scripture should be accessible to all, and should not conjure explicit vivid and "provacative " images.
River is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 03:14 PM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Alberta
Posts: 1,049
Default

Quote: How did the Prophet know that plants have gender?

Most plants are hermaphrodites, they Don't have gender. Conifers and flowering plants have both male and female parts on the same plants. How about ferns? You cannot say a fern is male or female. One of the few plants I know of that do have gender is the Ginko - which was a very rare tree up until the last century, only surviving in one grove.
Late_Cretaceous is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.