Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-07-2002, 10:20 PM | #81 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,567
|
Did I ever say that a rock experience anything?
I thought this thread was about the existence of time, and how do you suggest that the rock changes if there is no time? |
08-07-2002, 10:23 PM | #82 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,567
|
Quote:
That everything we observe is only in our heads. |
|
08-07-2002, 10:41 PM | #83 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
|
|
08-07-2002, 10:52 PM | #84 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
|
|
08-07-2002, 11:04 PM | #85 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
that is if time exists at all, it needs some memory. I'm simply echoing Answerer's question [b]((((((((("Well, how can a rock experience change when it can't even remember what it is doing one second ago?" asked Answerer. Your slope is tooooo slipperry <img src="graemlins/boohoo.gif" border="0" alt="[Boo Hoo]" /> |
|
08-08-2002, 03:35 AM | #86 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,956
|
Quote:
I get your view that time set the condition for change. But time could be our own awareness and product of changes(which is the opposite of your views), see the alternative? There could be no time without changes at all. Furthermore, since time is 'real' dimensional space to you, could you tell us where is the rock's past and future is kept and hidden? [ August 08, 2002: Message edited by: Answerer ]</p> |
|
08-08-2002, 05:00 AM | #87 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,567
|
Quote:
I must have stepped on my own toes here, because I do agree with your statement that our perception of time is based on our brains "speed". If our brains were to work twice as fast, I guess our surrounding world would seem to go at halfspeed (slowmotion). Guess I should have read more backwards. I was never too fond of the supposed timedimension myself. [ August 08, 2002: Message edited by: Theli ]</p> |
|
08-08-2002, 05:02 AM | #88 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montrčal
Posts: 367
|
ALL,
The benefits the rock gets out of time is that it CAN BE A ROCK, the intrinsic time of the rock helps the rock to show itself as a rock, the ordering of the rock. My belief is time helps order existence and through the being of existence we in turn experience the order through consciousness and its continuity. We have the ability to follow the existing order of existence. To postulate a past and a future means we accredit NOW as an experience through which time acts as companion guide. You can drop the guide if you are not a determinist. The future seems steadier than the past because it is the immediate result of NOW being in effect. The past is shady because it needs to be copied, and depending on who directs the copying, god starts being blamed. Time is folded into the steadiness of the experience or the steadiness of the mass in order that the mass or the experience prove itself capable of being recognised. Capable of enduring so much of existence. Exactly how this is achieved I am not sure. * * * The past of this system seems embedded in its NOW, in its existential. The system itself seems to record some of the changes which occur due to the passage of time, but this does not seem adequate to provide records on demand. Sammi Na Boodie () |
08-08-2002, 05:19 AM | #89 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montrčal
Posts: 367
|
Black Moses,
in case you did not know, the rock is a memory of itself. Remember human memory and memories are not exactly the same thingie. Sammi Na Boodie () |
08-09-2002, 02:08 AM | #90 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South of Sahara
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
[ August 09, 2002: Message edited by: Black Moses ]</p> |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|