FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-08-2003, 09:27 AM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 633
Default

What somebody else said about it being the default position ... God seems to me, to be a taught concept designed to appeal to our emotions and sense of infallibility.

Once God is posited as the ultimate justification for everything, then there is no need to think further and everything becomes neatly packaged into the enormous blind spot in your mind far too many people think is God.

Remove the emotional aspects of God/religion, and what are you left with? hollow superstitions and empty rituals which serve no purpose other than to reassure the believer that he/she has a place that's important in the Universe.

And if that's not arrogance, then I don't know what is ...
Barcode is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 09:39 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rational BAC
No two believers do believe exactly the same thing.
Not only that, but the number of distinct groups of believers who believe substantially different things about god is absolutely staggering. Even the meagre sample provided on this forum does much to demonstrate the sheer diversity of conflicting beliefs about god.

What is really fascinating is that, despite the incredible number of contradictory beliefs and the lack of hard, objective evidence to provide anything more than token support to any of them, believers overwhelmingly remain confident, if not sanguine, that their particular beliefs are correct. It seems that each has concluded that faith alone has led him to the right answer, even though it has misled most everyone else.

What causes this? Arrogance? Gullibility? Perhaps a simple unwillingless to take a critical look at cherished beliefs? Some people say (for example) that almost everyone is going to hell. Some people say that no one is going to hell. Others say that only certain people are destined to end up there, though they cannot agree on which. Some say that there is no such thing as hell. At a minimum, most of these people must be wrong. What is it that makes any individual believer think that he is not part of this group?
fishbulb is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 11:58 AM   #23
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Rational BAC
But what a wonderful illusion!!! Do dogs and cats and lions and tigers and bears ponder such things? I doubt it. But we humans do. Can't be helped. Part of our nature. Always has been. In all times and cultures.
Good point. As far as humans are concerned, we are the only creatures that is cursed with a clear reality of our own mortality.

That is why it is natural and understandable that we would seek to find ways to do away with our fears by inventing religious beliefs in order to persurade and convince ourselves to some level so that we could escape this fate. The doctrine of heaven and the afterlife is one such belief.
BlessNot is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 12:30 PM   #24
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default A modest proposal

I am an Atheist because I don't want to follow god's loving plan. I prefer to live a life of debauchery and depravity doing what I please with a total disregard for morals. In fact when the interns get back here from lunch I believe I will chop one of them up and save the best parts in the freezer for diner tonight.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 01:02 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: On the road to extinction. . .
Posts: 1,485
Default

Jobar :
Quote:
Another good reason not to believe in God- the concept itself is incoherent. That's why there are so many different gods, and religions, and denominations; that's why holy wars. It's my contention that no two theists believe in exactly the same God; my interactions with believers in this forum constantly prove this.
Babble. It is people who convolute the concept. You claim the concept is incoherent because from your experience no two theists with whom you've interacted believe in exactly the same God. The various concepts are only incoherent because your mind does not have enough bandwidth to parse all the data. So this does not qualify as a reason. The paradox is clear.
sophie is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 01:04 PM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: On the road to extinction. . .
Posts: 1,485
Default

Biff the unclean :
Quote:
In fact when the interns get back here from lunch I believe I will chop one of them up and save the best parts in the freezer for diner tonight.
Cannibal? You are quite facinating?
sophie is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 01:16 PM   #27
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by sophie
Biff the unclean : Cannibal? You are quite facinating?
Isn't that what you always expected? Didn't you always think that if you caught an Atheist in an unguarded moment they would let it slip?

But it's okay. The Intern in question is Jewish so everything is kosher. It's just too bad that we are allowed meat on Fridays now so I am deprived of another evil pleasure.

If you'll excuse me I have to look in the store room to see if we have any blunt objects
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 01:30 PM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: On the road to extinction. . .
Posts: 1,485
Default

Biff the unclean :
Quote:
Isn't that what you always expected? Didn't you always think that if you caught an Atheist in an unguarded moment they would let it slip?
I thought they would have tried to show how they know omniGOD themselves.

Quote:
But it's okay. The Intern in question is Jewish so everything is kosher. It's just too bad that we are allowed meat on Fridays now so I am deprived of another evil pleasure.
I worked someplace once, and they tried to push fish down my throat Fridays. To avoid them I took eggs in the morning and lunched out.

Quote:
If you'll excuse me I have to look in the store room to see if we have any blunt objects
life of Brian?
sophie is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 01:55 PM   #29
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

I thought they would have tried to show how they know omniGOD themselves.

I do know him. The same way I know Tarzan, Superman, and Harry Potter. I've read the novels these "super heroes" are characters in. They are all fun, but not to be taken seriously. Of them all the best writing is in J.K. Rowling's work. Superman and God are tied for plot flaws because the characters have all of these superpowers but never live up to the potential that such powers would imply. Edgar Rice Burroughs becomes more fun because he is able to use his characters limitations to enhance the drama and he never contradicts himself like God's authors did. I think Burroughs wrote outlines first and kept them on a chalkboard in his office. That's how he kept track.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 08-08-2003, 03:09 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: On the road to extinction. . .
Posts: 1,485
Default

Biff the unclean :
Quote:
Superman and God are tied for plot flaws because the characters have all of these superpowers but never live up to the potential that such powers would imply.
But surely if you had taken the effort to construct a rel-life timeline, you may have construed that the best is yet to come.

However please don't hold your breath on my account.
sophie is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.