FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2003, 11:18 AM   #51
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Walross
I too would like to see some backup for this. Furthermore, if they need to engage in assault in order to maintain their self-esteem, then there truly is something wrong with them.

Walross
This may seem an unpopular view, but I see nothing wrong in bullying per se. Of course people's rights are infringed, nonetheless doesn't everybody get teased in some regard within the context of a school?
meritocrat is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 11:40 AM   #52
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by meritocrat
This may seem an unpopular view, but I see nothing wrong in bullying per se. Of course people's rights are infringed, nonetheless doesn't everybody get teased in some regard within the context of a school?
Now you are backpedaling...you said " I've heard some psychological research what states that bullies possess high self-esteem and harass others in order to maintain that level of self-esteem." So either post some citations to this research or retract and tell us the truth...this is simply your opinion.

And your view is more than unpopular...it is unequivocally refuted by the actual psychological research available which demonstrates repeatedly that bullying is harmful to the bully, the victim, and society in general.

You are allowed your opinion of course, but do not try to justify it with vague references to nonexistant research. If you want to be taken seriously around here you better be able to back up your claims. I challenge you one last time...back up this claim or retract it.
Viti is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 12:11 PM   #53
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 4,930
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by meritocrat
This may seem an unpopular view, but I see nothing wrong in bullying per se. Of course people's rights are infringed, nonetheless doesn't everybody get teased in some regard within the context of a school?
There's a HUGE difference between "teasing" and bullying. Everybody gets teased at one point or another. The difference is the intent. Teasing is a component of social banter. Bullies' purpose is to injure, terrify, or cut low their victims. If one is teased, one can always tease back; bullying allows no such recourse as it is usually reinforced by a threat of physical violence or the destruction of the victim's reputation.

teasing: "Damn, man, did your mom pick that shirt out for you? Eesh!"
bullying: "Only fags dress like that. We're going to beat the crap out of you after school, fag."

Even if the threat is never carried out, the intent is the same -- to inspire fear and shame in the victim. That ain't right. And it usually doesn't do any good for anybody.

RevDahlia is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 12:44 PM   #54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 21
Default Re:

At least at my high school, responding to bullying - i.e., if they hit first, and I hit back - falls under the No Tolerance rule. We'd both be suspended/fined by the police, no matter what happens. Is that fair? No, and thus the bullies know that nothing can be done about it unless we "tell" a teacher/administrator, and then the bullying would only get worse because you would be perceived as a "tattletale" or a "snitch."

Has this bullying happened to me? No, not in my high school career. But it did happen during my junior high years, and the same policy was in effect. I couldn't do anything about it. And the sad thing is, the bullies know this.

Bullying is unethical, but as long as people encourage it, it will happen.
souperman is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 01:43 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,569
Default

Quote:
This may seem an unpopular view, but I see nothing wrong in bullying per se. Of course people's rights are infringed, nonetheless doesn't everybody get teased in some regard within the context of a school?
How many times do we have to point out to you that bullying is not merely teasing. It is a pattern of denigration, humiliation, and threats, often with a component of physical assault. You even touch on the bottom line in your last post: people's rights are infringed upon. How can you defend the violation of another person's rights?

BTW, where are those links that show that being a bully is good for a person?

Walross
Walross is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 01:56 PM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 2,846
Default Re: Re:

Quote:
Originally posted by souperman
Bullying is unethical, but as long as people encourage it, it will happen.
Wrong. You have a "zero tolerance" rule and it still happens.

Humans are animals and some things about our nature are intrinsic. Declaring those aspects of are nature, that we would prefer didn't exist, as morally wrong, evil, or disgusting does not negate their reality. What it does do is leave those that did not learn how to properly deal with them in their youth, unprepared to deal with them in their adulthood.

Let’s make sure of what we are talking about here:

Quote:
from Merriam-Webster
Main Entry: 1bul·ly
Pronunciation: 'bu-lE, 'b&-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural bullies
Etymology: probably modification of Dutch boel lover, from Middle High German buole
Date: 1538
1 archaic a : SWEETHEART b : a fine chap
2 a : a blustering browbeating person; especially : one habitually cruel to others who are weaker b : PIMP
3 : a hired ruffian

Main Entry: 3bully
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): bul·lied; bul·ly·ing
Date: 1710
transitive senses
1 : to treat abusively
2 : to affect by means of force or coercion
intransitive senses : to use browbeating language or behavior : BLUSTER
synonym see INTIMIDATE

Main Entry: in·tim·i·date
Pronunciation: in-'ti-m&-"dAt
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): -dat·ed; -dat·ing
Etymology: Medieval Latin intimidatus, past participle of intimidare, from Latin in- + timidus timid
Date: 1646
: to make timid or fearful : FRIGHTEN; especially : to compel or deter by or as if by threats
- in·tim·i·dat·ing·ly /-"dA-ti[ng]-lE/ adverb
- in·tim·i·da·tion /-"ti-m&-'dA-sh&n/ noun
- in·tim·i·da·tor /-'ti-m&-"dA-t&r/ noun
synonyms INTIMIDATE, COW, BULLDOZE, BULLY, BROWBEAT mean to frighten into submission. INTIMIDATE implies inducing fear or a sense of inferiority into another <intimidated by so many other bright freshmen>. COW implies reduction to a state where the spirit is broken or all courage is lost <not at all cowed by the odds against making it in show business>. BULLDOZE implies an intimidating or an overcoming of resistance usually by urgings, demands, or threats <bulldozed the city council into approving the plan>. BULLY implies intimidation through threats, insults, or aggressive behavior <bullied into giving up their lunch money>. BROWBEAT implies a cowing through arrogant, scornful or contemptuous treatment <browbeat the witness into a contradiction>.

Main Entry: fright·en
Pronunciation: 'frI-t&n
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): fright·ened; fright·en·ing /'frI-t&n-i[ng], 'frIt-ni[ng]/
Date: 1666
transitive senses
1 : to make afraid : TERRIFY
2 : to drive or force by frightening <frightened the boy into confessing>
intransitive senses : to become frightened
- fright·en·ing·ly /-t&n-i[ng]-lE, -ni[ng]-lE/ adverb

Main Entry: 1fear
Pronunciation: 'fir
Function: verb
Date: before 12th century
transitive senses
1 archaic : FRIGHTEN
2 archaic : to feel fear in (oneself)
3 : to have a reverential awe of <fear God>
4 : to be afraid of : expect with alarm
intransitive senses : to be afraid or apprehensive
- fear·er noun
So, bullying is essentially the establishment of dominance by the installation of fear. By completely ignoring the fact that bullying and being bullied is a part of childhood, we do not allow children to learn:

Quote:
from Merriam-Webster
Main Entry: cour·age
Pronunciation: 'k&r-ij, 'k&-rij
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English corage, from Old French, from cuer heart, from Latin cor -- more at HEART
Date: 14th century
: mental or moral strength to venture, persevere, and withstand danger, fear, or difficulty
synonyms COURAGE, METTLE, SPIRIT, RESOLUTION, TENACITY mean mental or moral strength to resist opposition, danger, or hardship. COURAGE implies firmness of mind and will in the face of danger or extreme difficulty <the courage to support unpopular causes>. METTLE suggests an ingrained capacity for meeting strain or difficulty with fortitude and resilience <a challenge that will test your mettle>. SPIRIT also suggests a quality of temperament enabling one to hold one's own or keep up one's morale when opposed or threatened <her spirit was unbroken by failure>. RESOLUTION stresses firm determination to achieve one's ends <the resolution of pioneer women>. TENACITY adds to RESOLUTION implications of stubborn persistence and unwillingness to admit defeat <held to their beliefs with great tenacity>.
The bullied learns that courage, resolution, and tenacity will stop the bullying. They learn that fear is an unproductive and oft unwarranted reaction. A lesson that will serve them well for, the rest of their lives.

The bully learns that intimidation is not a reliable method of establishing dominance. In fact, it can produce the opposite result when, confronted by an individual that displays courage in the face of their bullying.

These lessons must come under the supervision of adults. There’s a reason that we don’t allow children the same rights and privileges as adults. Children left to their own means can be very cruel to those weaker than they are.

Of course this is the problem that comes from parent’s abdicating their role as teacher and relying on the public school system to warehouse their children. Or should I point out some recent examples of how well our school systems are instilling these concepts in our youth?
Majestyk is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 02:25 PM   #57
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

I think the 0 tolerance policy is counterproductive. Rather than equally punish both children, the whole of the situation must be evaluated and the aggressor dealt with. Bullies need to be taught better ways to deal with their anger and control issues, and victims need to learn coping skills and ways to lessen the "vicitm" signals they often send out.
Viti is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 04:03 PM   #58
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by meritocrat
This may seem an unpopular view, but I see nothing wrong in bullying per se. Of course people's rights are infringed, nonetheless doesn't everybody get teased in some regard within the context of a school?
When it's unsafe to be out of the teacher's sight during recess (for the entire 4 years), that's not fair.

When you're beat to semiconciousness and left in a field, that's not fair.

When neither the police nor the school won't do anything about the ringleader of the above attack, despite a long history of violence on his part, that's not fair.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 04:09 PM   #59
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default Re: Re:

Quote:
Originally posted by souperman
At least at my high school, responding to bullying - i.e., if they hit first, and I hit back - falls under the No Tolerance rule. We'd both be suspended/fined by the police, no matter what happens. Is that fair? No, and thus the bullies know that nothing can be done about it unless we "tell" a teacher/administrator, and then the bullying would only get worse because you would be perceived as a "tattletale" or a "snitch."

Has this bullying happened to me? No, not in my high school career. But it did happen during my junior high years, and the same policy was in effect. I couldn't do anything about it. And the sad thing is, the bullies know this.

Bullying is unethical, but as long as people encourage it, it will happen.
If they tried that on a kid of mine (not that they have any) they would be facing a lawsuit. Self-defense is legal.

At least it wasn't like that when I was in school. Reporting assaults (even to the police--yeah, we know about that guy. Stay away from him.) did nothing. One time I got lucky when jumped 5' from the school building and ended up giving the guy a bloody nose. (He didn't expect me to deflect his charge--I ran him into a brick wall.) The principal took one look at us, said he had seen the other guys many times for fighting, he had never seen me before. He sent me on my way, the other guys were sent to detention. Of course that lead to the beating mentioned earlier.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 04:11 PM   #60
Obsessed Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Not Mayaned
Posts: 96,752
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LadyShea
I think the 0 tolerance policy is counterproductive. Rather than equally punish both children, the whole of the situation must be evaluated and the aggressor dealt with. Bullies need to be taught better ways to deal with their anger and control issues, and victims need to learn coping skills and ways to lessen the "vicitm" signals they often send out.
The victim signals are not having enough friends to match their group. There's nothing legal you can do.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.