FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-02-2003, 11:20 AM   #41
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

So, in 2001 there were at least two earthquakes stronger than the Jan. 26 India earthquake - one on June 23 off Peru, and one on Nov. 14 in China. In addition, there was one on Jan. 13 of equal magnitude off the coast of Central America. How do these earthquakes compare to the "angles" of astronomy?
Mageth is offline  
Old 05-02-2003, 11:35 AM   #42
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 1,840
Default

Is it just me, or does Volker miss the point completely every single time?

Hey Volker! I have a question:

Quote:
How are mental qualities attributed to bodies of gas or rock? Supposing a new astronomical body is discovered, how are its mental qualities discerned, and how would disputes over such planetary qualities be resolved? I've asked politely about 5 times now.
That makes it seven times. Still refusing to answer? Don't blame ya! Its a toughy, and cuts right to the heart of why astrology is BS.


Quote:
Volker:
This is a scientific discussion board, and I think if one is telling such bullshit he disqualifies him self from science.
I agree. You've talked alot of bullshit, and evaded all the substantive questions we've asked you.

Quote:
To read such bullshit is the reason, for that I have finished the discussion here in this forum.
Well, since you never even began to answer any of our substantive questions, I doubt you'll be sorely missed. Don't let the door hit Uranus on the way out. But before you go, I have one, simple question:

Quote:
How are mental qualities attributed to bodies of gas or rock? Supposing a new astronomical body is discovered, how are its mental qualities discerned, and how would disputes over such planetary qualities be resolved?
Patrick
ps418 is offline  
Old 05-02-2003, 11:38 AM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Volker.Doormann
Sorry, you are wrong here.
It was a question. How can it be wrong?

Quote:
I do science.
That word "science". I don't think it means what you think it means.
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 05-02-2003, 11:57 AM   #44
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mageth
So, in 2001 there were at least two earthquakes stronger than the Jan. 26 India earthquake - one on June 23 off Peru, and one on Nov. 14 in China. In addition, there was one on Jan. 13 of equal magnitude off the coast of Central America. How do these earthquakes compare to the "angles" of astronomy?
Mageth, I am off. Time is over. If you have scentific arguments against the given aguments, please argue. To show only to be able to ask questions means nothing.

Please take note of the relevant planetary angle distances in the charts of some major earthquakes in 2001 : doormann.tripod.com/130201su.gif + doormann.tripod.com/130201ss.gif + doormann.tripod.com/250201.gif +doormann.tripod.com/280201.gif . Also here are planetary constellations of the quake in California on 17.01.1994 doormann.tripod.com/940117.gif and in Kobe, Japan on 17.1.1995
doormann.tripod.com/kobe30.jpg

Volker
Volker.Doormann is offline  
Old 05-02-2003, 12:48 PM   #45
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Mageth, I am off. Time is over.

Well, you keep saying that, but you keep coming back.

If you have scentific arguments against the given aguments, please argue. To show only to be able to ask questions means nothing.

I'm asking questions to try to establish whether there's a link between angles and earthquakes. If there is, then there should be significance in the angles when there are earthquakes, and little or no significance when there aren't. Are there examples when there is great significance in the angles when there were no major earthquakes, and major earthquakes when there was little or no significance to the angles? These are the kinds of questions an enquiring scientific mind would want to know the answers to.

Please take note of the relevant planetary angle distances in the charts of some major earthquakes in 2001

I'm sorry, but those charts make little sense to me. As you well know, there are earthquakes every day - some larger than others. How often do these significant angular relations between planets occur? If they occur quite often, as they seem to by the number of charts you've posted, it's not surprising that one can idtentify earthquakes that correspond to them, as there are several earthquakes every day, and significant earthquakes happen quite often as well.
Mageth is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.