FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-10-2003, 01:40 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: England
Posts: 2,608
Default

Other animals eat animals. Ergo, why is it wrong to eat the felsh of other beings?

And if plants can feel pain, then what exactly is left to eat?
meritocrat is offline  
Old 03-10-2003, 01:59 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: الرياض
Posts: 6,456
Default

i would have to agree with humans being animals, and it is fine for us to hunt other animals
pariah is offline  
Old 03-10-2003, 02:16 PM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by meritocrat

And if plants can feel pain, then what exactly is left to eat?
Twinkies.

or

Taco Bell "food".
Shadowy Man is offline  
Old 03-10-2003, 05:10 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 792
Default

Quote:
Big Spoon:

That animals (with the possible exception of chimps) are not sentient is the main reason I can see for distinguishing between animals and humans.
That's a good post hoc rationalization, but I doubt it has anything to do with the distinctions we currently make.

It's easy to understand why humans would be more protective of one another, generally speaking, than other animals. If we all agree to not kill one another, and to protect one another, we all gain something. It is therefore to our advantage to make these bargains. Also, we seem to have strong natural inhibitions towards killing each other (which is probably why we still exist as a species), which makes us more amenable to the concept of human rights.

Other animals are incapable of entering into such bargains with us, so there is little direct benefit to us to agreeing not to kill them or even to treat them humanely; they can offer nothing in return. Nonetheless, many of us do have feelings that animal life ought to be accorded respect, and that a certain degree of humanity should be extended towards them. Perhaps it is because we are, by nature, both empathic and caring. We can put ourselves in the place of others, including animals, and we don't like the idea that they might be suffering, particularly at our own hands. (Which is, in part, why we might get very upset about slaughterhouse practices but not be at all concerned that wild animals regularly face even more terrifying, gruesome, and painful deaths at the paws of other wild animals, disease, infection, starvation, and the elements.)

One way to make ourselves feel better is to institute standards, be they personal, conventional, or legal, for the treatment of both other human beings and other animals. Another way is to try to deny that suffering is really taking place, or to distance ourselves from it. If you never ask where veal or Nikes or cheap gasoline come from, you never have to deal with the conflicting emotions of getting someting you enjoy and realizing that others must suffer for it. A third way is to rationalize that a certain amount of suffering is somehow justified because the animal (or human) deserves it or was created for that purpose. And, of course, not everyone is equally caring or empathic; some people may be genuinely unconcerned with the welfare of anyone or anything but themselves. Others may see themselves in every living thing.
fishbulb is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 02:30 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Tucson, Arizona, USA
Posts: 735
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: athiesm and animal rights

Quote:
Originally posted by Shadowy Man
So, if we managed to come up with a way to kill animals painlessly, it would then be ok to eat them?


And do you really know that vegetables don't feel pain?
So, yeah, I think it would be OK, by the lights of any 'vegetarian for animal welfare reasons'.

And how do I know? The absence of a nervous system, for one.
Dr. Retard is offline  
Old 03-16-2003, 10:55 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 1,336
Default

Greetings:

Hey, plants eat animals...why should we put ourselves below plants on the food chain...

Keith.
Keith Russell is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.