FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-24-2003, 09:33 AM   #11
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington, the least religious state
Posts: 5,334
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Feather
paid Hamas suicide bombers etc...
Do they accept credit cards in Paridise?


hw
Happy Wonderer is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 09:36 AM   #12
Laci
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Hey Laci (and other unthinking Bush apologists): Spin This!!

So Laci, in your view, what is the most likely explanation for this?

1) Bush deliberately lied to the American people about Saddam and al-Qaida.

2) Bush was "asleep at the switch" and honestly thought that Saddam and al-Qaida were working together.

3) Bush's speechwriters had information linking Saddam with al-Qaida, but the information was so top-secret that they didn't dare share it with the CIA.

4) Other (append your explanation here).


I'd rather choose from my own unbiased list and not yours'.
 
Old 07-24-2003, 09:39 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
Default Re: Re: Hey Laci (and other unthinking Bush apologists): Spin This!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Laci
So Laci, in your view, what is the most likely explanation for this?

1) Bush deliberately lied to the American people about Saddam and al-Qaida.

2) Bush was "asleep at the switch" and honestly thought that Saddam and al-Qaida were working together.

3) Bush's speechwriters had information linking Saddam with al-Qaida, but the information was so top-secret that they didn't dare share it with the CIA.

4) Other (append your explanation here).


Quote:
I'd rather choose from my own unbiased list and not yours'.
That would be option 4, Laci. Or do you not read the end of things either?
livius drusus is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 09:39 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: surrounded by fundies
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
I'd rather choose from my own unbiased list and not yours'.
Isn't that what option 4 is for? Or do you not read, just like your hero, W?
Flynn McKerrow is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 09:40 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Selva Oscura
Posts: 4,120
Talking

I like the way you think, Flynn.
livius drusus is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 09:45 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the gulag
Posts: 3,043
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nog
Here comes the spin

Maybe no connection with Al Qaida but there was other terrorist bases in Iraq. This is a war on terror .
1- What right did we have to attack them without provocation? They could easily declare a war on terror and attack us then (since we started it) and it'd be a-ok by your logic.

2- Why the hell are we not after Al Qaida? Don't tell me we are, if we were then we'd be all up Saudi Arabia's ass..............15 of the hijackers came from there, etc etc etc........
Jacey is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 09:45 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: surrounded by fundies
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by livius drusus
I like the way you think, Flynn.
LOL...Nice cross post.
Flynn McKerrow is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 10:13 AM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: the gulag
Posts: 3,043
Default

Laci,

Please answer. You're dodging is quite boring and annoying, and you risk no one taking you seriously if you just make an assertion without backing anything up.
Jacey is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 10:22 AM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: edge of insanity
Posts: 1,609
Default

(perhaps her (Laci's) speechwriters are working on it....)

When is there going to be a more serious call to arms in America for making Shrub explain all his lies and deciets (sp?). To say "We didn't read it because it was too long and had footnotes", when the article you should have read could have decided wether or not to go to war, is analogous to a freakin 10 year old brat kid not doing his homework becuase it had too much reading.

This president makes me sick.
auto-da-fe is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 10:33 AM   #20
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MegaDave
To say "We didn't read it because it was too long and had footnotes", when the article you should have read could have decided wether or not to go to war, is analogous to a freakin 10 year old brat kid not doing his homework becuase it had too much reading.
Unfortunately we seem to be turning into a nation of 10-year-old brats.
Godless Dave is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:16 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.