FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-16-2002, 06:56 PM   #211
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

For freethinker

We can freely choose to accept or reject God - You have chosen to live eternally without Him and I have chosen to live eternally with Him. Free will at its finest. You are implying to the extent you believed in Hell, you would accept God, right?

I'll add one more point - to me, the genius in creating this universe where the existence or non-existence of God can't be proven, and is left up to each individual to decide and "believe" (or not believe) is awe inspiring in and of itself. And yes, I realize that you can never prove the non-existence of something.
RJS is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 06:59 PM   #212
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Let me ask you (as in y'all) a question.

Do you think is more likely that life/existence is random (uncreated?) or that it was created by a higher being that decided to leave a piece of the puzzle out for us to find?
RJS is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:03 PM   #213
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 929
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by RJS:
<strong>I am answering quite a few questions. To avoid the wolf analogy (which some didnt like), I kinda feel like a kicked a hornet's nest </strong>
But, hey, it's fun, isn't it? You seem to be enjoying the sparring of opinions. I certainly lilke this sort of thing, whether about religion, politics, music, whatever. In graduate school studying philosophy, we used to go at each other for a full three hour seminar, then head accross the street for a pizza and a pitcher of beer and then argue some more.

Unfortunately, though, for you and for us, you are rather outnumbered here. So I'll say again, please do invite some of your Christian friends to join us. The more, the merrier.

Thanks for sticking around and responding like this.
Hobbs is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:03 PM   #214
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by RJS:
<strong>

You must not have kids. I have the power to do my kid's homework, but they still have to do it. I also have the power to let my 3 year old out of time-out as soon as she starts crying hysterically (usually after about one second), but I dont. And I do love my kids.</strong>
You have no other choice. Your kids have to learn to take care of themselves and you can't magically impart that knowledge. Are you going to tell me God is constrained by the same forces as you?

<strong>
Quote:
Please don't respond that a 3 year old crying in time out is different than the ebola virus or something.</strong>
Nice tactic. Emotionally poison the logical argument before it's made.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:03 PM   #215
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Quote:
Probably thankful that it was happening to someone else.

RJS - here's a suggestion:

Big rock + motion + your sensitive body part, repeat as needed until salvation is acheived

Don't delay - mortify yourself for God today.

I'll look forward to hearing how the experience strengthened you
Your post alone strengthened my faith. Kinda like when I listened to the Walter Martin debate vs. Madalyn Murray.
RJS is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:04 PM   #216
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: DC Metropolitan Area
Posts: 417
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by RJS:
<strong>For freethinker

We can freely choose to accept or reject God - You have chosen to live eternally without Him and I have chosen to live eternally with Him. Free will at its finest. You are implying to the extent you believed in Hell, you would accept God, right?

I'll add one more point - to me, the genius in creating this universe where the existence or non-existence of God can't be proven, and is left up to each individual to decide and "believe" (or not believe) is awe inspiring in and of itself. And yes, I realize that you can never prove the non-existence of something.</strong>
You call this "Free Will at its finest", but I responded to this reply earlier by asking you if you believed that act of "allowing someone to choose A or B, but then punishing them for choosing B" is truly free will. Do we really look at free will or freedom this way in everyday life. We hardly called this freedom when we had free speech laws but censored people for saying things we did not like. Right. We hardly called this freedom when we gave blacks the right to vote, but then beat them to pieces when they exercised such rights. We supposedly have free will, yet, if we don't follow gods guidelines, we are punished. What is the difference between this and censorship or beating minorities. "Pick A or B, but if you pick B, you will go to hell." That's not Free Will.
free12thinker is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:06 PM   #217
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by RJS:
<strong>

Hey, I'm 2-2 on predicting the atheist response. You folks are easier to figure out than the believers.</strong>
Well done. Now refute it, your smugness.
Philosoft is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:09 PM   #218
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Quote:
So, you think that all who consider themselves to be Christians are real Christians
No. It is way too high. But good for effect occasionally.

Quote:
The mere fact that they all don't agree on what Christianity is all about does not give me good grounds to accept that Christianity is true.
I agree that this is an eternal tragedy. The RC Church may be the largest offender. I think if we all went back and read the NT - we could be on the same page. But alas, I once was lost, and now am found.
RJS is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:09 PM   #219
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 759
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by RJS:
<strong>Let me ask you (as in y'all) a question.

Do you think is more likely that life/existence is random (uncreated?) or that it was created by a higher being that decided to leave a piece of the puzzle out for us to find?</strong>
Impossible question to answer. We can make no determination on the likelihood of anything when we only have a sample of one and do not know the answer for this particular case.

If it is possible that existence is the result of randomness and if it is possible that it was created by a higher being then Occam's Razor automatically suggests we choose randomness until more information is available.

However, we do not know if it is possible that the universe is the creation of a higher being and we do not know if it is the result of randomness.

One other thing in favour of randomness is that we are pretty certain that randomness in fact exists. Who knows whether there are higher beings or not?
David Gould is offline  
Old 05-16-2002, 07:10 PM   #220
RJS
Regular Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 303
Post

Quote:
Quantity over quality, eh?
Nah, I'll stick with the odds. Plus, I think you might agree that a 2 billion sample is diversified enough to be reliable.
RJS is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.