FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-13-2002, 11:21 AM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by Kenny:
In my view, God’s sovereignty embraces the natural order in such a way that “natural laws” are simply a means through which God acts.
Since these physical laws are invented by scientists as a means of explaining what they see, and are not actually intrinsic properties of the phenomema they describe anymore than a map to your house is itself your house, are you then suggesting that God takes his cues for how to order the cosmos from the scientists that invented these laws?

Please elaborate.

[ September 13, 2002: Message edited by: Kind Bud ]</p>
Autonemesis is offline  
Old 09-14-2002, 10:48 AM   #22
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: South Bend IN
Posts: 564
Post

Kind Bud,

I’m not sure exactly what the point your driving at is. I’m a scientific realist so I do not believe that the laws of physics are merely arbitrary conventions. I agree that there is a distinction between our description of those laws and the laws themselves, but that does not mean that our descriptions are arbitrary since there is an external standard by which we must measure our descriptions against. An accurate map of my apartment is not an arbitrary invention on someone’s part; such a map must conform to the actual layout my apartment and it will contain information which describes real objective features of my apartment. The same is true of our descriptions of the natural world, insofar as they are accurate, and the natural world itself. God doesn’t take His cues from our descriptions; we do our best to order our descriptions according to the objective reality God has made.

That being said, I think this is likely little more than semantics. Do you deny that nature exhibits certain regularities? If not, then all my assertion amounts to is the claim that nature's regularities are themselves a means through which God acts. In Christian theology, this idea would be included in the doctrine of divine providence. In fact, I think that when certain Christians (such as Young Earth Creationists) make something’s happening through natural processes and something’s being an act of God mutually exclusive, they are inadvertently undermining this doctrine and undervaluing the sovereign rule of God in all things.

God Bless,
Kenny

[ September 14, 2002: Message edited by: Kenny ]</p>
Kenny is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.