FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 09:28 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-19-2003, 07:38 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Africa
Posts: 2,194
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
strawman, like the scarecrow.

so gurdur, if iraq went to a fundamentalist shiite government you would be more pissed about it than jerry falwell? your response to loren about the 60% majority figure only appeared to legitimaze the possible desirability of such a government. unless you are not really an atheist
...gurdur, on the other hand, doesn't say "Yahahaha" or "Yay!". There's nothing in his post to imply that he wants a theocracy. I think the smiley was just cos he enjoys hilighting Loren's false premise. Honestly fatherphil, from your posts you seem exceptionally eager to tar and fether anti-war posters at any opportunity, rather than argue the case.
Farren is offline  
Old 04-19-2003, 07:47 PM   #12
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 433
Default

Nah, I'm not pleased. I'm just amused by the irony. All this is pure slapstick to me. If there is a single group that is more militantly anti-semitic than the Shia, just let me know. At this rate, the only way there will be peace in the Middle East will be to give up on Israel, and the US is so Zionist that there is less than a snowball's chance in Hell of that being considered. What a bunch of froot loops we have living in the White House. Sheesh.
Nataraja is offline  
Old 04-19-2003, 09:13 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

farren:

is he then saying that 60% of the population agree with these protesters?

what i post are questions i have with certain statements made or opinions about certain statements made. thats it. surely the majority of "anti war" posts here (and lord knows there are enough of them) go without any comment by myself.

the things that interest me, i post about.
fatherphil is offline  
Old 04-19-2003, 09:30 PM   #14
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: India
Posts: 6,977
Default

Iraq simply does not have any secular tradition. Baath party's repression have made the Shiites only more intense and determined to have an Islamic state. I doubt if very many people in Iraq would mind an Islamic republic, contrary to US propaganda. If there is an election I am betting they would sweep the polls as in PaKistan.
hinduwoman is offline  
Old 04-19-2003, 09:33 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

make them the 51st state and then it will not matter so much if they sweep the polls. we could sick the aclu on them any time they attempt to mix church and state.
fatherphil is offline  
Old 04-19-2003, 09:51 PM   #16
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 433
Default

Phil, are you one of those people who are unable to see any version of what is going on beyond what the White House wants you to believe?
Nataraja is offline  
Old 04-20-2003, 12:45 PM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Absurdistan
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Loren Pechtel
It's not "the Iraqi people". It's a religious group that wants us out to make it easier for them to become the new leaders.

As usual, it's the vocal minority that gets the news coverage.
When is a sample big enough to be representative of the whole population?

When a few hundred irakis take down a statue of Saddam Hussein? When a few dozen irakis smile at US troops or thank them?

They were tens of thousands in these anti-US manifestations last friday. It was probably an organised demonstrations, but it's still impressive numbers. These people were having their first free street protest in years and years.

How many irakis will have to demonstrate in the street before their sentiments are no longer summarily dismissed as those of the minority?
25 millions?

I think we better take notice of the voices of discontent long before it gets to that point.

Soyin
Soyin Milka is offline  
Old 04-20-2003, 02:08 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Nataraja
Phil, are you one of those people who are unable to see any version of what is going on beyond what the White House wants you to believe?
i guarantee you the white house does not want statehood of iraq, at least not until a democrat occupies the oval office.

but sure i can see other versions, just like i'm assuming that you can consider their version without rejecting it out of hand.
fatherphil is offline  
Old 04-20-2003, 05:39 PM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 422
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatherphil
make them the 51st state and then it will not matter so much if they sweep the polls. we could sick the aclu on them any time they attempt to mix church and state.
Even if that were to happen, it would be nearly impossible to enforce the laws of the US that far away. If the local authorities have no respect for the Constitution, then its not worth the paper its written on. And I doubt that would go down well with the world community and the Iraqi's would definetly not vote for that, but of course you were just joking about the whole 51's state business.
Nikolai is offline  
Old 04-20-2003, 07:41 PM   #20
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 433
Default

Phil, it's been known from the beginning that the Iraqi people don't really trust the US. It's actually been getting a little coverage lately, but you still have to watch insomniac/early morning news to see it at all. They are rightly concerned with keeping their oil out of the hands of foreign vultures.

The White House wants us to believe that this was a bloodless war. The Pentagon has refused to reveal the actual cost in civilian lives they have incurred. Have you visited www.iraqbodycount.net lately? Those numbers are each the lost life of an innocent human being, and don't even account for those who will be crippled for life by their injuries, conscripted Iraqi soldiers who died fighting, those who die in the chaos, or those who are unaccounted for. Does that mean anything to you at all? How many people have to die for you to stop supporting the madman who is living in the White House?

I don't think that you are likely to give a number. You support him blindly. You don't care how many people die because of him, do you? I dare you to give a number at which you would cease to support him. Be careful, though because, if you pick too low, you might actually have to change your opinion; if you pick to high, you will condone a cost in lives that no sane person would tolerate.
Nataraja is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.