FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-03-2002, 12:56 PM   #11
SRB
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 227
Post

SRB
Or does the Godhead consist of three distinct Gods?

Douglas:
Yes. (Although "distinct" should be qualified by saying "distinct Persons Who are Each God, yet uniquely share the same 'essence', Each being eternal and uncreated".)

SRB
The Athanasian Creed states "And yet they are not three almighties, but one almighty... And yet they are not three Gods, but one God," which apparently directly contradicts what you say here. Furthermore, if the Godhead consists of three distinct Gods, then polytheism is true. [Polytheism is the theory that there is more than one God]. As traditionally understood, Christianity is incompatible with polytheism. That's why I said that this option, which computes most admirably, is heretical.

SRB
SRB is offline  
Old 11-03-2002, 07:56 PM   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
Posts: 460
Post

SRB,


Quote:
The Athanasian Creed states "And yet they are not three almighties, but one almighty... And yet they are not three Gods, but one God," which apparently directly contradicts what you say here.
Okay. Where in the Bible can I find the "Athanasian Creed"?

Quote:
Furthermore, if the Godhead consists of three distinct Gods, then polytheism is true.
No. Because, as I've said, the Godhead contains three distinct Persons, but they are not "distinct" in the sense that they Each have exactly the same nature and substance, and they are in complete unity of mind and will.

Quote:
[Polytheism is the theory that there is more than one God].
Usually (or always?), this implies a complete distinction between the various "gods", and has no implication of "unity" amongst them.

Quote:
As traditionally understood, Christianity is incompatible with polytheism. That's why I said that this option, which computes most admirably, is heretical.
As traditionally understood, yes. That is, polytheism is traditionally understood as implying certain things which contradict Christianity, and thus Christianity is seen as being incompatible with polytheism. As a strictly technical matter, I suppose one would have to say that the Biblical teaching on the Trinity implies that the Bible is "polytheistic", if one defines "polytheism" as teaching that there is more than one Person Who is God. But I think that would overlook the significant differences between the doctrine of the Trinity and "traditional" polytheism.


In Christ,

Douglas
Douglas J. Bender is offline  
Old 11-03-2002, 08:56 PM   #13
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Post

Where in the bible does it say that there is a Trinity?
Strange, don't cha think, that at the same time it was decided that three persons made up one god it was also decided that it took three persons to be Caesar? Each was Caesar and the three together were Caesar.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 12:15 AM   #14
HRG
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 2,406
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Douglas J. Bender, in part:
Yes. (Although "distinct" should be qualified by saying "distinct Persons Who are Each God, yet uniquely share the same 'essence', Each being eternal and uncreated".)

<snip>

As I have said, the mathematics and logic regarding the Trinity do compute.
Perhaps in your version of mathematics. In the more common version, equality is a transitive relation (if a=b and b=c then a=c). Thus if for three persons P1, P2 and P3:

P1 = God and P2 = God and P3 = God

then P1 = P2 = P3.

HRG.
HRG is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 05:21 AM   #15
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
Posts: 1,255
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Biff the unclean:
<strong>Strange, don't cha think, that at the same time it was decided that three persons made up one god it was also decided that it took three persons to be Caesar?</strong>
Nice point.

I suppose if Christianity was founded tomorrow there would be a democratically-elected Holy Parliament. That would make prayers kind of unwieldy
mecca777 is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 06:59 AM   #16
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
Posts: 460
Post

Quote:
HRG: Thus if for three persons P1, P2 and P3: P1 = God and P2 = God and P3 = God

then P1 = P2 = P3.
Or how about:

If for three persons P1, P2, and P3: P1 = Human and P2 = Human and P3 = Human, does it then follow that P1 = P2 = P3? No? Then your formulation is faulty, since you are applying a faulty definition for "God".


In Christ,

Douglas

[ November 04, 2002: Message edited by: Douglas J. Bender ]</p>
Douglas J. Bender is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 07:03 AM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Elkhart, Indiana (USA)
Posts: 460
Post

Quote:
Biff the Unclean: Where in the bible does it say that there is a Trinity?
Explicitly or implicitly? If the former, nowhere; if the latter, many places.

Quote:
Biff the Unclean: Strange, don't cha think, that at the same time it was decided that three persons made up one god it was also decided that it took three persons to be Caesar?
References, please. Besides, the Old Testament, which implicitly teaches the doctrine of the Trinity in several places quite clearly, was written WAY before any "Caesar" had even existed.

Quote:
Biff the Unclean: Each was Caesar and the three together were Caesar.
Sounds like Satan perhaps effecting a "copycat" doctrine in order to discredit or weaken the truth. He tries to do that all the time.


In Christ,

Douglas
Douglas J. Bender is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 08:20 AM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Post

(it took three persons to be Caesar?)
References, please.

No arcane or esoteric knowledge here. See Edward Gibbon's The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
You might even try the Catholic Encyclopedia. When Constantine the Great saw the fiery sign in the sky he was fighting a war to oust the other Emperors to be the sole Caesar. After he died they went back to multiple

Besides, the Old Testament, which implicitly teaches the doctrine of the Trinity in several places quite clearly, was written WAY before any "Caesar" had even existed.
Now you're getting silly. How many Jewish Trinitarians were there?

(Each was Caesar and the three together were Caesar.)
Sounds like Satan perhaps effecting a "copycat" doctrine in order to discredit or weaken the truth. He tries to do that all the time.

Satan checks in with you on his hobbies, does he?
"Copycat" like all the Triune Gods and Goddesses the Hellenists had? Like the Galatian Goddess Mary perhaps? She had three aspects virgin-mother, nymph and wise woman (crone). Just like the three Mary's that stood at the foot of the cross.
Or do you mean "copycat" like the Father, Son and Holy Ghost? That trinity was the bases of the Dionysian religion. Zeus, Dionysos and the ghost of Dionysos mother, the blessed virgin Semele. Dionysos descended into Hades and redeemed her ghost, brought her to Heaven.

Please explain how these older religious beliefs can be copies--Satanic or otherwise--of Christian beliefs when they occurred so many centuries before Christianity.
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 12:32 PM   #19
SRB
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 227
Post

Douglas:
Where in the Bible can I find the "Athanasian Creed"?

SRB
You can't, but the given idea is <a href="http://wbsa.logos.com/article.asp?id=5818" target="_blank">Biblical</a>. The Bible, as well as traditional Christianity, teaches that there is one God and not three, as you claim.

SRB
Furthermore, if the Godhead consists of three distinct Gods, then polytheism is true.

Douglas:
No. Because, as I've said, the Godhead contains three distinct Persons, but they are not "distinct" in the sense that they Each have exactly the same nature and substance, and they are in complete unity of mind and will.

SRB
Three Gods who all agree with each other are qualitatively, not numerically, identical. So long as you affirm that there are three Gods rather than one you are a polytheist, even if you say these three beings have much in common.

SRB
Polytheism is the theory that there is more than one God

Douglas
Usually (or always?), this implies a complete distinction between the various "gods", and has no implication of "unity" amongst them.

SRB
I disagree. Three Gods who all agree with each other, have the same intentions and thoughts, yet can still be distinguished one from another, are still three Gods. Someone who believes in such things is a polytheist. This follows from the definition of "polytheist."

SRB
SRB is offline  
Old 11-04-2002, 12:53 PM   #20
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Everywhere... I'm Watching you...
Posts: 1,019
Post

Hey amos, I see you gettin better at being coherent, keep up the good work!!!
Mecha_Dude is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:51 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.