![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 7,018
|
![]()
I do not know, but it is said:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 979
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 3,477
|
![]()
Go, Dean!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UA
Posts: 1,141
|
![]()
Does anyone have the figures for overall fundraising available? As in, both in the second and first quarters of this year (and before?). How close is Dean to being first?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gatorville, Florida
Posts: 4,334
|
![]() Quote:
== Bill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gatorville, Florida
Posts: 4,334
|
![]() Quote:
However, again, let me emphasize that it is very illegal for you to give money to somebody in order for them to make a contribution on your behalf, so this only works if you have an agreeable mate. ========== As I said above, however, each campaign is required to match multiple contributions from the same donor for the purposes of federal matching funds, so it doesn't matter how you give the money (one big lump or multiple small lumps) if the campaign is doing its job. The only way around this is as I've described above, and then you must be careful to not do anything illegal (like actually giving money to a third party to donate on your behalf....). == Bill |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gatorville, Florida
Posts: 4,334
|
![]() Quote:
For example, while John Kerry is reported to have only received five or six million in the second quarter, he will still end the quarter with about $11 million in the bank (representing prior receipts minus disbursements to date). Dean won't have anywhere near that amount of cash in the bank, even after his fundraising blitz of the past two weeks. The ABC News feature The Note gives lots of squishy details about this (this page will time out in a few hours or days, so get-em while their hot....). This Boston Globe article might be available longer. But it appears that the top tier of candidates (from some perspective, anyway) is now Kerry, Edwards, and Dean. Gephardt appears to be on the bubble (with Dean and/or Edwards) because if Dean is "in" the top tier, then either Gephardt or Edwards must necessarily be "out." The remainder of the second tier consists of Senators Graham and Lieberman, with Lieberman's stock falling rapidly.....
Unfortunately for Dean, he has now set himself a high bar for the next quarter. As these things go, you are expected to go up as the year goes on, not down. While one down quarter does not a candidate kill, a couple of bad quarters will usually cause donations to really dry up, as people will consider that your campaign is headed for the trash heap and it will do them no good to throw good money after bad..... So, like the Gephardt aide was quoted as saying in the Boston Globe, ''If Dean raises $15 million on the Internet in the next quarter, then we'll reevaluate." This is typical political posturing. You try to set low expecations for your guy and impossible expectations for the other guy. I would say that if Dean raises $15 million on the Internet in the third quarter, the primary might as well be over, as he will have met even Gephardt's impossible expectations. Unfortunately for Gephardt, if Dean's following keeps growing, he just might do it! == Bill |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|