FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 02:40 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2003, 02:48 AM   #51
Jat
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Worldtraveler
I don't necessarily disagree here, but do you have any links to provide documentation of this? I find it a little hard to believe, but I can accept hard numbers.

Thanks for starting this thread, pope. It is interesting to compare and contrast this with some of the views that have been expressed in the 'monster abortion thread'.

-Lane
http://208.55.30.156/facts/other/costly.shtml
Jat is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 06:51 AM   #52
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Grad Student Humanist
I don't understand the concern. If someone chooses of their own free will to commit suicide, I support that decision, whether or not it's state-assisted, doctor-assisted, family assisted or totally self-administered.

If a person does not want to live with him/herself after committing a crime which would land them in prison for life, or if a person simply prefers execution to life imprisonment then I think the person's wishes should be taken into account.
If I followed Mike Rosoft's objection correctly, he was saying that in some cases, someone might actually commit a murder for the express purpose of getting a death sentence, as a means of suicide; thus, if there were no death penalty, he wouldn't have committed the murder in the first place. I'd concede that this happens on occasion, but I'm not convinced that it happens often enough to be a serious public policy concern.
NHGH is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 07:27 AM   #53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Melrose, MA
Posts: 961
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by NHGH
If I followed Mike Rosoft's objection correctly, he was saying that in some cases, someone might actually commit a murder for the express purpose of getting a death sentence, as a means of suicide; thus, if there were no death penalty, he wouldn't have committed the murder in the first place. I'd concede that this happens on occasion, but I'm not convinced that it happens often enough to be a serious public policy concern.
Oh ok, I get it now. But I doubt it. Seems like an awfully convoluted way to commit suicide. It's more likely said person would just get into a shootout with the police or something.
Grad Student Humanist is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 07:46 AM   #54
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Jat
http://208.55.30.156/facts/other/costly.shtml [link to a cost breakdown for capital vs. noncapital murder trials]
I've never found the cost argument against the death penalty to be very convincing. I'd agree that the disparity is there, but I don't think it reflects anything inherent in the death penalty. It's just a reflection of the fact that, in criminal justice as in other things, you get what you pay for--and we demand a higher quality of justice in capital trials than in noncapital trials.

That's particularly troubling if you believe (as I do) that life imprisonment would actually be worse than execution. At the very least, I think a lot of people would agree that life imprisonment isn't all that much better than death. But if these two sentences are comparable in their severity, shouldn't we invest an amount of resources into a noncapital murder trial comparable to the amount we invest in a capital trial? Is anyone else bothered by this?
NHGH is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 07:07 PM   #55
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,671
Default

Treason and desertion from the armed forces are both betrayals of one's country, and both are punishable by imprisonment or death. Very relevant.
Opera Nut is offline  
Old 06-08-2003, 02:59 AM   #56
Jat
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by NHGH
I've never found the cost argument against the death penalty to be very convincing. I'd agree that the disparity is there, but I don't think it reflects anything inherent in the death penalty. It's just a reflection of the fact that, in criminal justice as in other things, you get what you pay for--and we demand a higher quality of justice in capital trials than in noncapital trials.

That's particularly troubling if you believe (as I do) that life imprisonment would actually be worse than execution. At the very least, I think a lot of people would agree that life imprisonment isn't all that much better than death. But if these two sentences are comparable in their severity, shouldn't we invest an amount of resources into a noncapital murder trial comparable to the amount we invest in a capital trial? Is anyone else bothered by this?
Death is not a real punishment since once you're dead you're death. You learn nothing from you mistakes and that is what a punishment is suppose to be. Life is the real punishment.

Would you want to spend the rest of your life in a little, I think, 9X6 cell with no privacy, you can own nothing, you can't choose what you may want to do. You can't choose when to eat, to clean yourself, to even when you go to sleep.

To those who mistakenly believe that being in a prison is like being in a resort... You are ignorant fools.
Jat is offline  
Old 06-09-2003, 11:00 AM   #57
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester NY USA
Posts: 4,318
Default

For those of you arguing about the relative harshness of the death penalty vs. life imprisonment, how about this modest compromise? Abolish executions and sentence all of the death-penalty-eligible convicts to life imprisonment without possibility of parole. Then with each dinner, also present them with a sealed container holding a pill that would cause painless but certain death. The pill must be returned in order for the prisoner to receive his next breakfast.

Andy
PopeInTheWoods is offline  
Old 06-09-2003, 12:03 PM   #58
Jat
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PopeInTheWoods
For those of you arguing about the relative harshness of the death penalty vs. life imprisonment, how about this modest compromise? Abolish executions and sentence all of the death-penalty-eligible convicts to life imprisonment without possibility of parole. Then with each dinner, also present them with a sealed container holding a pill that would cause painless but certain death. The pill must be returned in order for the prisoner to receive his next breakfast.

Andy
The trouble with that is that if you piss someone off in the prison you may find a little extra surprise in your pudding one day....
Jat is offline  
Old 06-09-2003, 12:47 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rochester NY USA
Posts: 4,318
Default

Jat,

I agree that in the general prison population, such an idea is logistically unworkable. For the sake of argument, let's pretend that these "capital crime" convicts are in a Death-Row-like (or even "SuperMax") environment: solitary confinement at least 23 hrs/day, no physical interaction with other prisoners, minimal interaction with guards, monitoring to prevent abuse by prison authorities, etc. What do you think of the theory?

Andy
PopeInTheWoods is offline  
Old 06-09-2003, 01:31 PM   #60
Jat
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,311
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by PopeInTheWoods
Jat,

I agree that in the general prison population, such an idea is logistically unworkable. For the sake of argument, let's pretend that these "capital crime" convicts are in a Death-Row-like (or even "SuperMax") environment: solitary confinement at least 23 hrs/day, no physical interaction with other prisoners, minimal interaction with guards, monitoring to prevent abuse by prison authorities, etc. What do you think of the theory?

Andy
Assisted suicide is a crime.
Jat is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.