FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-08-2003, 09:09 PM   #31
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
Default

Quote:
It's an educated guess based on the fact that I've never heard any arguments for the procedure based on physical abnormalities.
So you're assuming facts not in evidence?
Calzaer is offline  
Old 07-08-2003, 09:42 PM   #32
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft
I think there's an obvious difference in relative harm. But you've surely considered this, so what's your angle?
Both are said to make sense to the "more open-minded than thou" crowd (membership in said crowd being determined by the most vocal advocates for each); and both, frankly, are weird - though obviously pedophilia is more than just weird.

What's wrong with weird? It tends to want to be seen as not weird at least - and perhaps even better than not weird. That means it demands acceptance from those who are not weird.

I think long-haired, maggot-infested, dope-smoking FM types are weird...but if such a person decides he no longer wants to play the weirdo, he can take a bath and get a haircut. If a transsexual thinks better of the transformation, he/she is rather up a creek without a paddle. I think it's a hideous tragedy that such surgery was ever considered for those who are physiologically normal.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-08-2003, 09:46 PM   #33
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Calzaer
So you're assuming facts not in evidence?
Maybe I am. When I am presented with credible evidence to the contrary, I'll drop the assumption.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-08-2003, 10:15 PM   #34
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
Both are said to make sense to the "more open-minded than thou" crowd (membership in said crowd being determined by the most vocal advocates for each); and both, frankly, are weird - though obviously pedophilia is more than just weird.

What's wrong with weird? It tends to want to be seen as not weird at least - and perhaps even better than not weird. That means it demands acceptance from those who are not weird.

So, to sum up: transsexuality and pedophilia are analagous because both are "weird"? Seriously?
Quote:
I think long-haired, maggot-infested, dope-smoking FM types are weird...but if such a person decides he no longer wants to play the weirdo, he can take a bath and get a haircut. If a transsexual thinks better of the transformation, he/she is rather up a creek without a paddle. I think it's a hideous tragedy that such surgery was ever considered for those who are physiologically normal.
I'm having a bit of trouble accepting that you've got the prospective transsexual's best interests in mind when you say this. Honestly, I have no idea how many transsexuals wake up one day and decide they've made a big mistake. And of those, I have no idea how many are unable to cope with their mistakes, but I suspect it's a vanishingly small number. The upshot of your concern is that these few individuals are somehow representative of transsexuals in general. The ones who are satisfied with their sex-changes are, I guess delusional and those who are coping are, what, victims of a blind psychological community?
Philosoft is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 04:34 AM   #35
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: where orange blossoms bloom...
Posts: 1,802
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Philosoft


Honestly, I have no idea how many transsexuals wake up one day and decide they've made a big mistake. And of those, I have no idea how many are unable to cope with their mistakes, but I suspect it's a vanishingly small number. [/B]
I would posit that most who wake up one day and regret the change would have some sort of religious guilt at the root of it.
beth is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 05:48 AM   #36
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
The same can be said for pedophilia.
...which happens to involve the violation of another human being's rights without their consent. So the similiarity is...what, exactly?
Daggah is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 05:50 AM   #37
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
Default

Woops, I see yguy's idiocy there has already been addressed.
Daggah is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 05:51 AM   #38
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: where orange blossoms bloom...
Posts: 1,802
Default

I wonder, according to Christian theology, do people who are transgendered ever have a chance at redemption? They will always be an abomination in the eyes of God. So they are commiting sin continually, or, is it that they can just pray for forgiveness one and be done with it? Hmmm....
beth is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 07:49 AM   #39
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

Originally posted by yguy
Not the same. A BMW with all of its wheels on is obviously better than one with a missing wheel. The surgical proceedure in question is more comparable to remanufacturing the BMW into a Mercedes. What's the point?

Umm, if I recall, you brought this analogy to the table.
Mageth is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 08:05 AM   #40
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 3,440
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by blondegoddess
I wonder, according to Christian theology, do people who are transgendered ever have a chance at redemption? They will always be an abomination in the eyes of God. So they are commiting sin continually, or, is it that they can just pray for forgiveness one and be done with it? Hmmm....
Or more precisely, does god want them to be attracted to the opposite sex based on their genetic makeup or their physical makeup, if there's a conflict there? And what if they have both? Holy Automatic Damnation, Batman!
Rhaedas is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.