Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-12-2003, 07:25 AM | #621 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by dk
Treacle Worshipper: And every man should be considered a rapist until he proves he is not, reporting to the govt every 3 months... dk: I assume background checks are performed on people before given access to kids in public schools. This hardly amounts to an accusation. My point was that forcing people to prove that they don't have HIV is the same as forcing a man to prove that he is not a rapist, or forcing (prospective) parents to prove that they will not be infanticides. dk: I advocate for the nuclear family precisely because public schools have degenerated over the last 40 years. Kids need to be tested for hiv because of the crisis that exists in public schools. 40 years ago metal detectors, drug sniffing dogs, and armed hall guards would have been unthinkable. Times have changed. But this is a US problem. There are many, many other countries in the world, with more liberal laws relating to sexuality, where the above security precautions are unnecessary. Treacle Worshipper: (3 months because that's the time it takes for the current test to pick up the HIV virus. You would have to test & re-test every 3 months to be sure someone didn't have HIV.) dk: I'd be interested in your source. My GP. (General practitioner. I think "primary care provider" is the US equivalent.) It takes 3 months for antibodies to the HIV virus to appear in the bloodstream in high enough levels that they can be picked up by a test. If someone tests -ve one day, they could go out & have unsafe sex that evening. You would have to wait 3 months & re-test in order to be sure that they were still -ve. dk: I’m not out to lynch gays, there are home tests now for a number stds. Why not do the tests in school, or better yet hand them out tom mom and dad at teacher/parent conferences to administer at home along with drug tests. See how accountability works. I think you live in a very different world from mine; in the UK STD & drug use are not at such proportions that forcing pupils to be tested for them would even be considered. I feel very sorry for the States if these problems are so endemic there. TW |
05-12-2003, 07:42 AM | #622 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
|
|
05-12-2003, 08:29 AM | #623 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
Where have you been for the last 20 pages? |
|
05-12-2003, 08:33 AM | #624 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
|
Quote:
|
|
05-12-2003, 09:36 AM | #625 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
|
Quote:
Yes, it is empathy. But even if the guy had known he was HIV+ there was nothing to make him tell the women he slept with. Unless in addition to testing you're going to have the diagnosis tattoo'd on people's foreheads. There have been cases of guys going out & deliberately infecting others. No to New Laws On Deliberate HIV Infection Seizure of records allowed in case over HIV infection Deliberate HIV transmission Diagnosis does not equal responsibility, sadly. TW |
|
05-12-2003, 03:21 PM | #626 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
|
|
05-12-2003, 09:27 PM | #627 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
|
Quote:
Quote:
Treacle Worshipper: My GP. (General practitioner. I think "primary care provider" is the US equivalent.) It takes 3 months for antibodies to the HIV virus to appear in the bloodstream in high enough levels that they can be picked up by a test. If someone tests -ve one day, they could go out & have unsafe sex that evening. You would have to wait 3 months & re-test in order to be sure that they were still -ve. dk: > 20% of hiv+ people in the US have not been tested. Quote:
But let me be specific about what I find most troubling in the US. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
05-12-2003, 09:31 PM | #628 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
|
DK, you are still arguing compulsion. Do you like being forced to do things? Maybe you do, but the whole point is, compulsion of adults is a priori wrong. Don't try to make me do anything I don't want to do, and I promise not to fight back. OK?
|
05-12-2003, 09:48 PM | #629 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
|
Quote:
1) serostatus allows people to get early treatment 2) serostatus allows people to protect others 3) serostatus allows public health officials to deter the spread of the disease. The quilt of deniability no longer serves The Gay Rights Movement, we need to stop the spread of hiv/aids to successive generations. SSM is simply another political ploy to advance an gay agenda. NO MORE SECRECY!!! Compassion demands disclosure not more political games. Ignorance makes people fearful not disclosure. |
|
05-12-2003, 09:52 PM | #630 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
|
The problem with HIV spread is twofold: Lack of proper sex education, and people refusing to take personal responsibility, both of which are political issues. Your requirement of mandatory testing is also a political solution. In fact, it is counterproductive, not least because it further estranges those tested against their will from the concept of personal responsibility. How can they take personal responsibility when you keep forcing them to do this, and denying them the right to do that? Just because you want everyone marching in step doesn't make it right.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|