FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-12-2003, 07:25 AM   #621
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by dk
Treacle Worshipper: And every man should be considered a rapist until he proves he is not, reporting to the govt every 3 months...
dk: I assume background checks are performed on people before given access to kids in public schools. This hardly amounts to an accusation.


My point was that forcing people to prove that they don't have HIV is the same as forcing a man to prove that he is not a rapist, or forcing (prospective) parents to prove that they will not be infanticides.

dk: I advocate for the nuclear family precisely because public schools have degenerated over the last 40 years. Kids need to be tested for hiv because of the crisis that exists in public schools. 40 years ago metal detectors, drug sniffing dogs, and armed hall guards would have been unthinkable. Times have changed.

But this is a US problem. There are many, many other countries in the world, with more liberal laws relating to sexuality, where the above security precautions are unnecessary.

Treacle Worshipper: (3 months because that's the time it takes for the current test to pick up the HIV virus. You would have to test & re-test every 3 months to be sure someone didn't have HIV.)
dk: I'd be interested in your source.


My GP. (General practitioner. I think "primary care provider" is the US equivalent.) It takes 3 months for antibodies to the HIV virus to appear in the bloodstream in high enough levels that they can be picked up by a test. If someone tests -ve one day, they could go out & have unsafe sex that evening. You would have to wait 3 months & re-test in order to be sure that they were still -ve.

dk: I’m not out to lynch gays, there are home tests now for a number stds. Why not do the tests in school, or better yet hand them out tom mom and dad at teacher/parent conferences to administer at home along with drug tests. See how accountability works.

I think you live in a very different world from mine; in the UK STD & drug use are not at such proportions that forcing pupils to be tested for them would even be considered. I feel very sorry for the States if these problems are so endemic there.

TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 07:42 AM   #622
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
So you learned how to suffer from the Crusades from a Muslim?

Do you know how stupid this sounds?
Are you wilfully this ignorant? I have empathy. Homophobes like you could do with some empathy, too. It would make you less bigoted.
Kimpatsu is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 08:29 AM   #623
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kimpatsu
Are you wilfully this ignorant?

Where have you been for the last 20 pages?
keyser_soze is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 08:33 AM   #624
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kimpatsu
Are you wilfully this ignorant? I have empathy. Homophobes like you could do with some empathy, too. It would make you less bigoted.
There was an article in the paper last week about a HIV+ college basketball player that gave over a 100 women HIV. Compusory testing could have prevented at least 75 people from the disease. What do you think, isn't that being empathetic?????
dk is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 09:36 AM   #625
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 931
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
There was an article in the paper last week about a HIV+ college basketball player that gave over a 100 women HIV. Compusory testing could have prevented at least 75 people from the disease. What do you think, isn't that being empathetic?????
dk,
Yes, it is empathy. But even if the guy had known he was HIV+ there was nothing to make him tell the women he slept with. Unless in addition to testing you're going to have the diagnosis tattoo'd on people's foreheads. There have been cases of guys going out & deliberately infecting others.

No to New Laws On Deliberate HIV Infection

Seizure of records allowed in case over HIV infection

Deliberate HIV transmission


Diagnosis does not equal responsibility, sadly.
TW
Treacle Worshipper is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 03:21 PM   #626
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
There was an article in the paper last week about a HIV+ college basketball player that gave over a 100 women HIV. Compusory testing could have prevented at least 75 people from the disease. What do you think, isn't that being empathetic?????
No, because compulsion is still wrong. Your basketball player needs to learn empathy, too, but your statement is one in which you claim to know best. DK: a majority of one.
Kimpatsu is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 09:27 PM   #627
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Treacle Worshipper: And every man should be considered a rapist until he proves he is not, reporting to the govt every 3 months...
dk: I assume background checks are performed on people before given access to kids in public schools. This hardly amounts to an accusation.
Treacle Worshipper
: My point was that forcing people to prove that they don't have HIV is the same as forcing a man to prove that he is not a rapist, or forcing (prospective) parents to prove that they will not be infanticides.
dk: Its 20+ years since the epidemic broke out in gay communities and 20% of people with the virus are ignorant of their serostatus. The incubation period is 5 years. There has been no backlash against gay people. People benefit by knowing they are carriers for three reasons 1) to seek treatment 2) to take precautions not to spread the virus and 3) to track and deter anyone that poses a public health risk. This is a public health issue not a privacy issue. Gay youth (14-23) in some metropolitan areas are being infected at a 4% rate per/year. I can’t imagine why anyone would object to tracking an illness, least of all the people of an at risk population.
Quote:
dk: I advocate for the nuclear family precisely because public schools have degenerated over the last 40 years. Kids need to be tested for hiv because of the crisis that exists in public schools. 40 years ago metal detectors, drug sniffing dogs, and armed hall guards would have been unthinkable. Times have changed.
Treacle Worshipper: But this is a US problem. There are many, many other countries in the world, with more liberal laws relating to sexuality, where the above security precautions are unnecessary.
dk: It’s a small world. In the US metropolitan areas of NYC, SFS and LA house about 25% of the gays in the US, so they would be analogous to London.

Treacle Worshipper: My GP. (General practitioner. I think "primary care provider" is the US equivalent.) It takes 3 months for antibodies to the HIV virus to appear in the bloodstream in high enough levels that they can be picked up by a test. If someone tests -ve one day, they could go out & have unsafe sex that evening. You would have to wait 3 months & re-test in order to be sure that they were still -ve.
dk: > 20% of hiv+ people in the US have not been tested.

Quote:
dk: I’m not out to lynch gays, there are home tests now for a number stds. Why not do the tests in school, or better yet hand them out tom mom and dad at teacher/parent conferences to administer at home along with drug tests. See how accountability works.
Treacle Worshipper: I think you live in a very different world from mine; in the UK STD & drug use are not at such proportions that forcing pupils to be tested for them would even be considered. I feel very sorry for the States if these problems are so endemic there.
dk: HIV’s a serious problem in the London area where most gays live in the UK. In South Africa there’s >4mil people >20% of the population carry the virus. The scope and magnitude of the hiv/aids problem in Sub Saharan Africa is beyond me. There’s no one size fit all approach. Civilizations and nations grow and prosper by solving problems that arise from time to time. It seems pretty clear to me that wherever promiscuous anonymous sex flourishes so does HIV/AIDs.

But let me be specific about what I find most troubling in the US.
Quote:
HIV Prevalence Trends in Selected Populations in the United States
Results from National Serosurveillance, 1993–1997
HIV Prevalence Among Selected Populations
Youth Populations
Patients at Adolescent Medicine Clinics
HIV prevalence rates among adolescents are likely to reflect recent infections because of the limited time since they began the high-risk behaviors that led to infection. Clinics specifically serving adolescents and young adults are of special interest because they serve a population that may not be seen at other health care facilities. These clinics offer a wide range of services, including family planning, physical examinations, prenatal care, counseling, STD treatment, and general medical care. Of the five adolescent medicine clinics in three metropolitan areas that collected data each year from 1993–1997, four were hospital-based and one was community-based.
Eligible patients were those aged 13–24 years who initially visited the clinic during the survey period and from whom a blood specimen had been drawn as part of routine clinic procedures. Patients who visited the clinic for HIV testing, for treatment of HIV infection, or for follow-up were excluded from the survey.
During the study period, 23,886 specimens from five adolescent medicine clinics in three metropolitan areas (Baltimore, Houston, and New York City) were collected and tested according to the CDC protocol. HIV prevalence was low among patients at these clinics. (snip)
---- CDC HIV Surveillance
Lets move forward in time.
Quote:
One of the fastest-growing AIDS populations in the United States is teenagers: in the first six months of 1995, AIDS cases in 13- to 19-year-olds increased 524 percent compared with all of 1994, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Most of this increase occurred among gay teenagers, reflecting the coming of age of these boys within a population that has always been at high risk.
The overall picture of AIDS in adolescents, however, differs in some striking ways when compared with the pattern in adults: a greater percentage of teenagers with AIDS are female (35 percent vs. 14 percent of adults with AIDS), are African American or Hispanic (63 percent vs. 51 percent), and were infected with HIV through heterosexual contact (20 percent vs. 8 percent).
----- Growing Pains: Adolescents and STDs
I find it incredible that people don’t bother to ask how hiv/aids got into public schools under the tutelage of political hacks response for public schools. In my opinion public schools, academia and government are afraid of being labeled homophobes. I repeat my prior statement, when the Gay Rights Movement got access to public schools they brought hiv/aids into the public schools. There has been no backlash against gays, so we need to move forward and remove the quilt of deniability. We need accountability, not cold war secrecy and privacy. The Gay Rights Movement has rode the hiv/aids epidemic to political power, now it time to anti-up. All indications, in the US at least, show that HAART treatments have lead to a resurgence of high risk behaviors that have spread the disease to youth. The Gay Rights Movement has concentrated its efforts on youth and needs to be called to account. The UK can take whatever lessons seem applicable, the first step to stop hiv/aids stops the spread to new generations. In my opinion SSM is the holy grail of the Gay Rights Movement but what’s happening in public schools doesn’t bode well for anyone, least of all the politically correct status quo.
dk is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 09:31 PM   #628
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

DK, you are still arguing compulsion. Do you like being forced to do things? Maybe you do, but the whole point is, compulsion of adults is a priori wrong. Don't try to make me do anything I don't want to do, and I promise not to fight back. OK?
Kimpatsu is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 09:48 PM   #629
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kimpatsu
No, because compulsion is still wrong. Your basketball player needs to learn empathy, too, but your statement is one in which you claim to know best. DK: a majority of one.
Kimatsu you're a member of the status quo politically correct crowd that has failed to prevent hiv/aids from reaching out and touching young people. This is an epidemic, not a political crisis. The psychological workups the Gay Rights Movement and academics promote with raw political power haven't stopped the spread of aids, but have transported the disease to a new generation. The facts are quite persuasive. Please address the facts, not the failed programs perpetuated by the status quo for the last 20 years.

1) serostatus allows people to get early treatment
2) serostatus allows people to protect others
3) serostatus allows public health officials to deter the spread of the disease.

The quilt of deniability no longer serves The Gay Rights Movement, we need to stop the spread of hiv/aids to successive generations. SSM is simply another political ploy to advance an gay agenda. NO MORE SECRECY!!! Compassion demands disclosure not more political games. Ignorance makes people fearful not disclosure.
dk is offline  
Old 05-12-2003, 09:52 PM   #630
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

The problem with HIV spread is twofold: Lack of proper sex education, and people refusing to take personal responsibility, both of which are political issues. Your requirement of mandatory testing is also a political solution. In fact, it is counterproductive, not least because it further estranges those tested against their will from the concept of personal responsibility. How can they take personal responsibility when you keep forcing them to do this, and denying them the right to do that? Just because you want everyone marching in step doesn't make it right.
Kimpatsu is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.