![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#71 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 1,049
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Now, it's no longer like that as most have seen through the old myths and propoganda by now, and I doubt it will ever be like that again... Or at least for the foreseeable future, given the WONDERFUL reputation our leaders have given us lately, but for a while there, a good long while, it most definitely WAS. Again, I'm unfamiliar with Canadian culture, so I can't really comment on that yea or nay. I'm just sayin that for a good long while, the entire world poured in through our borders, and they're still here... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As far as the immigration deal, I would submit that the US had had MORE immigration from MORE DIVERSE populations in LESS OVERALL TIME than most other nations on earth. I don't have any hard numbers to back that up, so it's entirely possible I'm wrong, but that's the way it seems to me. The simple fact of immigration occuring in a country is not enough of a measure, IMV. It's also, like I said, where the immigration is from, and the time period the country has had to adjust to the new immigrants. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
-me |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 1,049
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
-me |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 1,049
|
![]() Quote:
The fact that neonazism is illegal in Germany actually IS, to american eyes, evidence that Germany IS more authoritarian and tolerant of authoritarianism than the States. It is wrong to outlaw political parties. It smacks of thought control... Trying to legislate what one can and cannot believe. Everybody has the right to believe whatever the heck they want to. They also have the right to agitate politically for their views. They do NOT have the right to infringe on the rights of others because of those beliefs. The same old argument I've seen here before... Everone has the right to BE racist, noone has the right to ACT racist. Or at least, so it seems through american eyes. -me |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: limbo
Posts: 986
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#76 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
![]() Quote:
However, since I am trying hard not to be destructively critical and utterly sarcastic, I will not give my opinion of "american eyes". I will point out it's a classic "Heads I win, tails you lose" argument from the Americans here. E.g. If Germany bans the Nazis, Germany is therefore authoritarian If Germany doesn't ban the Nazis, it's because Germany tolerates authoritarianism. |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|