Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
11-28-2002, 03:12 PM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
<a href="http://www.csicop.org/si/9701/placebo.html" target="_blank"> The Mysterious Placebo. </a>
A common saying is that if you treat a cold it will last a week, but if you leave it alone it will be gone in seven days. [ November 28, 2002: Message edited by: Mad Kally ]</p> |
11-28-2002, 03:14 PM | #62 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Coast. Australia.
Posts: 5,455
|
<a href="http://www.thebsh.com/intro.html" target="_blank">The Even More Mysterious Placebo</a>
|
11-28-2002, 03:17 PM | #63 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
|
Researchers disagree whether placebo effects are clinically important. The controversy is partly due to conceptual and methodological problems, and variations in the meaning of the concept of placebo effect. Placebo treatment has been reported to improve subjective and objective measures of disease in up to 30-40% of patients with a wide range of clinical conditions. Studies indicate that the placebo effect may be mediated by endogenous opioid neurotransmitters and not just all be "in the head."
The notion of placebo effect has at least two main meanings: effect of placebo intervention, and effect of patient-provider interaction. When the terms are defined pragmatically, effects of placebo can be estimated as the difference between placebo and no-treatment in randomized trials. The term placebo effect means not only the narrow effect of a dummy intervention but also the broad array of nonspecific effects in the patient-physician relationship. Attention, compassionate care, and the modulation of expectations, anxiety, and self-awareness all heighten placebo effects and are especially prominent in unconventional healing, and it seems possible that the unique drama of this realm may have "enhanced" placebo effects in particular conditions. Only prospective trials comparing placebo effects to therapy can provide reliable evidence to support claims of efficacy; there are none that support homeopathy. Rick |
11-28-2002, 03:35 PM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
<a href="http://www.skeptic.com/03.1.jarvis-homeo.html" target="_blank"> Homeopathy from Skeptic.com </a>
The Cardinal Principles of Homeopathy The Psora and Vitalism Hahnemann believed that 7/8ths of all diseases are due to an infectious disorder called the Psora (itch). In the words of Hahnemann's "Organon": This Psora is the sole true and fundamental cause that produces all the other countless forms of disease, which, under the names of nervous debility, hysteria, hypochondriasis, insanity, melancholy, idiocy, madness, epilepsy, and spasms of all kinds, softening of the bones, or rickets, scoliosis and chophouses, caries, cancer, fungus haematodes, gout-asthma and suppuration of the lungs, megrim, deafness, cataract and amaurosis, paralysis, toss of sense, pains of every kind, etc., appear in our pathology as so many peculiar, distinct, and independent diseases (Stalker, 1985). Hahnemann believed that diseases represent a disturbance in the body's ability to heal itself and that only a small stimulus is needed to begin the healing process. He owed this to his faith in vitalism, which holds that life is a spiritual, nonmaterial process and that the body contains an innate wisdom that is its own healing force. |
11-28-2002, 06:02 PM | #65 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,751
|
<a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=57&t=000107&p=" target="_blank">It never got any better than this, for my money...</a>
|
11-28-2002, 06:36 PM | #66 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
Clutch,
Please don't make me laugh in an upper forum. |
11-28-2002, 07:52 PM | #67 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
|
*chuckle* You know, I had forgotten about that thread? Classic Corwin.
|
11-28-2002, 09:01 PM | #68 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 312
|
The best statement:
Quote:
[edited to add: Wouldn't this mean that the force of gravity weakens over time, since it's being converted into heat? In ten billion years, acceleration due to gravity will be 8.2m/s^2, and ten billion years ago it was 11.3m/s^2.] [ November 28, 2002: Message edited by: Living Dead Chipmunk ]</p> |
|
11-29-2002, 03:10 AM | #69 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Middlesbrough, England
Posts: 3,909
|
Quote:
Boro Nut |
|
11-29-2002, 06:26 AM | #70 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
lpetrich: re Simon Jenkins. As far as I can recall his last ramblings on the subject, he doesn't think that studying science at the school level teaches you anything worthwhile. Science is not, apparently, an essential part of general knowledge.
Mind you, given the type of science teaching available in many schools, he may have a fraction of a point. In my experience, science is sometimes taught as a collection of recipes that you have to learn, not understand the priciples of. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|