![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
![]()
Who cares what the hell it is? It's just a dirty great big animal of some sort. Sheesh.
![]() Oh, and IMHO, it's a hippo. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Such a shame, since you already did so well with the Hebrew before... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
![]()
Firstly, which concordance are you using?
Secondly, you'd be better off using a lexicon. Thirdly, just give me a few minutes to get my stuff off the shelf, and I'll be right with you. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
![]() Quote:
2. What is that? 3. I am very new to this, so I expet to be wrong. I just thought Magus claiming it wasn't a Hebrew word sounded iffy...I googled it and found the info in 5 seconds...why couldn't he? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
![]()
First, the "unicorn."
From the International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't speak for the other Christians here. I only speak for myself. |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
![]()
Now for the "dragon." Here we have the Hebrew word tannin, which is actually quite flexible. It possesses a variety of meanings, all of which are defined by the context (as is the case with so many ancient Hebrew words.)
Easton's Bible Dictionary says:
Hope this helps. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
![]() Quote:
The plural ending (-oth) is a dead giveaway. (If singular, it would be -im.) ![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|