Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
05-11-2003, 11:42 AM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Who cares what the hell it is? It's just a dirty great big animal of some sort. Sheesh.
Oh, and IMHO, it's a hippo. |
05-11-2003, 11:45 AM | #12 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
Such a shame, since you already did so well with the Hebrew before... |
|
05-11-2003, 12:00 PM | #13 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
|
|
05-11-2003, 12:05 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Firstly, which concordance are you using?
Secondly, you'd be better off using a lexicon. Thirdly, just give me a few minutes to get my stuff off the shelf, and I'll be right with you. |
05-11-2003, 12:23 PM | #15 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
2. What is that? 3. I am very new to this, so I expet to be wrong. I just thought Magus claiming it wasn't a Hebrew word sounded iffy...I googled it and found the info in 5 seconds...why couldn't he? |
|
05-11-2003, 12:30 PM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
First, the "unicorn."
From the International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia:
|
05-11-2003, 12:41 PM | #17 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't speak for the other Christians here. I only speak for myself. |
|||||
05-11-2003, 12:48 PM | #18 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
|
|
05-11-2003, 12:53 PM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Now for the "dragon." Here we have the Hebrew word tannin, which is actually quite flexible. It possesses a variety of meanings, all of which are defined by the context (as is the case with so many ancient Hebrew words.)
Easton's Bible Dictionary says:
Hope this helps. |
05-11-2003, 12:54 PM | #20 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
The plural ending (-oth) is a dead giveaway. (If singular, it would be -im.) |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|