![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
#11 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Who cares what the hell it is? It's just a dirty great big animal of some sort. Sheesh.
![]() Oh, and IMHO, it's a hippo.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
![]() Such a shame, since you already did so well with the Hebrew before...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Firstly, which concordance are you using?
Secondly, you'd be better off using a lexicon. Thirdly, just give me a few minutes to get my stuff off the shelf, and I'll be right with you.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
2. What is that? 3. I am very new to this, so I expet to be wrong. I just thought Magus claiming it wasn't a Hebrew word sounded iffy...I googled it and found the info in 5 seconds...why couldn't he? |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
First, the "unicorn."
From the International Standard Bible Encyclopaedia:
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||||
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I don't speak for the other Christians here. I only speak for myself. |
|||||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Now for the "dragon." Here we have the Hebrew word tannin, which is actually quite flexible. It possesses a variety of meanings, all of which are defined by the context (as is the case with so many ancient Hebrew words.)
Easton's Bible Dictionary says:
Hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Veteran Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Walsall, UK
Posts: 1,490
|
Quote:
The plural ending (-oth) is a dead giveaway. (If singular, it would be -im.)
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|