FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-28-2003, 08:32 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Southeast of disorder
Posts: 6,829
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally posted by Strawberry
The way I see it, having somebody look out for my rear end is better than having nobody looking out for me at all.
In that case, I shall try to look at your rear end as much as possible.

[Last OT post, I promise.]
Philosoft is offline  
Old 01-28-2003, 08:48 PM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orions Belt
Posts: 3,911
Default

A modern version of Pascals Wager (he was french, afterall)

1. If you stare at a womans rear, she'll get pissed.

2. If you don't stare at a woman rear, she'll complain that nobody is staring at her rear.

Either way you're screwed, so you might as well just stare....

Edited back down to a pg rating.
Kosh is offline  
Old 01-28-2003, 09:05 PM   #13
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 24,524
Default

FWIW, many theists I know agree that it's a pretty poor argument. In fact, I have only seen it tried seriously a couple of times.

And here I was thinking the thread would be about how Pascal made a lot of money off of his programming language, but bet it all and lost it.
seebs is offline  
Old 01-28-2003, 09:53 PM   #14
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Down South
Posts: 12,879
Default

seebs, most of the Christians that have used Pascal's Wager on me are not active in apologetics and have had no idea there was any kind of "name" for what they were arguing (mostly new Xians and I have always been the first bona fide atheist they have met). Do you think they come up with it on their own and it sounds like common sense to them, or maybe heard it used and just thought it sounded good?
Viti is offline  
Old 01-28-2003, 09:59 PM   #15
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 372
Default

I always laugh when I here arguments that amount to pascals wager.

They say if there is no god they've lost nothing.
I say :

they've spent their sundays bored and giving away their money.

they've suffered guilt and emotional distress at the natural urge to procreate

the've believed a pack of lies and in a lot of cases have spread them around

in extreme cases they have been tortured or killed for their belief

they've live in fear of their imaginary god and his imaginary wrath

Shit the list goes on...

-Gambit
Proctors_Gambit is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 09:17 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Downriver Detroit
Posts: 1,961
Default

I like how Reverend Jim Puts it...
chekmate is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 09:28 AM   #17
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cadiz, Spain
Posts: 429
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gurdur

This whole argument (Pascal's wager) crumbles completely as soon as you ask the obvious question, "Which God ? Or Goddess ??? Or gods ????"
Obviously, the one with the most horrible hell and the best heaven.
DeLurking is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 10:03 AM   #18
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 552
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by notMichaelJackson
Pascal's Wager:

Believe and there is a God: heaven
Believe and there is no God: it does not matter
Don't believe and there is a God: hell
Don't believe and there is no God: does not matter.

There are problems with it, but that's what it is.
Also, it can be delivered in a variety of forms. I'm sure someone came up with it before Pascal, but he is give credit for it. The basic message is believe in God or go to hell. I've heard it given in the form of "if you believe in evolution and are right, then you are dead, but if you don't believe in Creationism and it is right you go to hell." Hundreds of forms. Exactly the same message.
notMichaelJackson is offline  
Old 01-29-2003, 02:12 PM   #19
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,460
Default

Quote:
FWIW, many theists I know agree that it's a pretty poor argument. In fact, I have only seen it tried seriously a couple of times.
This is true. There are some fairly bright theists out there.

Unfortunately, a good number of new (and old) fundies aren't among them. I have encountered this argument several times in my discussions on a xian board, but only with the fundy types. The more reasonable xians would never use an argument like that.

It really all depends on who you talk to, I suppose.

-Nick
I ate Pascal's Wafer is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.