FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-12-2002, 08:46 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 4,656
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm_MacDohmnall:
<strong>The definition for "Pagan" is one who does not believe in the Christian, Muslim, or Jewish God.
</strong>

I think you mean "heathen". "Pagan" is usually defined as polytheist, nature-worshipper or idolater. Although "heathen" is ultimately the translation of Latin paganus, it has acquired the meaning of "non-Abrahamic".

Quote:
<strong>
By definition all "Deists" would fall into the definitin of being "Pagans" as would all Hindus and many more belief systems.
</strong>

I don't think so. Deism and pantheism are more of religious philosophies, while paganism is complete with ritual and ceremony. Paine and Spinoza were Deist and pantheist respectively, but neither was a pagan. See also <a href="http://members.aol.com/Pantheism0/pagan.htm" target="_blank">here</a> about the relationship between religious philosophy (in this case pantheism) and paganism.

(edited for fixing tags)

[ August 12, 2002: Message edited by: Heathen Dawn ]</p>
Heathen Dawn is offline  
Old 08-12-2002, 11:13 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 13
Post

I always fall back on the definitions and not the perceptions.

<a href="http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=Deist" target="_blank">Deist</a>

<a href="http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=Pagan" target="_blank">Pagan</a>
Malcolm_MacDohmnall is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:25 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.