FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 08:25 PM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2003, 05:55 PM   #41
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 1,531
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by RED DAVE
Coming from the generation that invented flag burnig as a form of protest, I will say that I have always considered the irrational displays of violence, against this particular form of protest, which violence I pernoally witnessed on one occasion, to be extraordinary.
Oh, I agree. Displays of violence against someone who flips you the finger or calls your mother a whore are also irrational. Nevertheless, I am not surprised that people react that way. It strikes me as singularly stupid to expect people to sympathize with a cause that goes out of its way to burn a symbol that they respect.

Quote:
Flag burning began at a certain stage of protest against the Vietnam War when people burning (self-immolation by Buddhist monks and others -- how many of you remember that?) and draft card burning (and more peceful forms of protest) were not stopping the mass burning of Vietnamese (and shooting and bombing of them) by US forces.
I may be wrong, but flag burning was an old practice when it was picked up by Vietnam protesters. The burning of draft cards may have been invented during the Vietnam war, but it had little to do with the Buddhist tactic of self-immolation. Self-immolation may have shocked Americans, but it didn't insult them. Similarly, Gandhi's tactic of having his followers line up to be beaten had shock value without conveying a message of hatred.

Quote:
The "emotional displays of hatred" during the Vietnam War came far more from the Administration and its liberal and right wing supporters than from those of us who, out of rage and frustration against a seemingly endless war, occasionally burned a piece of cloth.
It wasn't just any piece of cloth, and not everyone thought that it was a smart tactic to burn flags or spit on returning soldiers.
copernicus is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 05:13 AM   #42
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chelmsford, South East England
Posts: 144
Default

I'm pretty sure I read in a Kurt Von Goght book that America is the only country that refuses to dip it's flag as other countrys do as a gesture of courtesy to another country such as during the opening ceremonies of Olympic Games.

Sounds rather arrogant is this true?
Harpy is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 05:29 AM   #43
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: .nl
Posts: 822
Default

Ummm, slightly off topic here... but, aside from this burning debate, how do you Americans feel about pledging your allegiance to a piece of cloth? This always struck me being weird.

I got thinking about this during the whole "under God" episode last year, and trying to imagine how I would have reacted, had my family moved to the US, not Holland.
I would not have been able o even recite this opening line, because it makes no sense to me.

Please note, this is an honest enquiry, from someone seeking an answer, not a flamefest.

On the flag burning issue, I never understood why it's such a big deal in the US. I I burned a Dutch flag here, people might mind the smell a bit, but that's probably all.
Mind you, here we regard patriotism as a dangerous and undesirable thing... we've seen what happens when it gets out of hand.
VonEvilstein is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 06:20 AM   #44
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by GaryP
Wouldn't it be nice if most Americans recognized and revered the Constitution half as much as we do a piece of cloth?
Nah, they'd claim to revere it without actually reading the whole thing, and twist its words to support their own agenda. Like they do with the Bible now.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 06:22 AM   #45
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Void
Posts: 396
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Oresta
Melkor, may your tribe increase. :notworthy
Good gravy, I hope it doesn't!!!
Quote:
Originally posted by Ab_Normal
My husband did his time in the Army (for the college money) and he always says, "I swore my oath to uphold the Constitution."
I've been known to say the same thing, and the interesting point is, I don't ever remember taking an oath that contradicts that, nor do I remember ever being summarily released from that oath once I was discharged.

I still consider it my duty to do my best to protect the Constitution of the United States. It's fortunate that I respected that document (or, more importantly, the freedoms that it recognizes and the limitations it places on government) well before I ever took such an oath, but I still take it very seriously.

Which is why I do everything in my power to be a "squeaky wheel" when it comes to stopping the advance of a tyrannical government.

I'm sure my congressman knows me by name by now, and I am fairly sure he doesn't like me.
Melkor is offline  
Old 02-11-2003, 01:02 PM   #46
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Boulder CO
Posts: 177
Default

I relish the irony of oil men who don't want a symbol for the country trashed but are eager to trash the actual country.
fanny666 is offline  
Old 02-12-2003, 06:54 AM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default

MELCOR, m' man: your post has dealt once for all w/ the rock-solid of the matter; and (i rest my case.... to put it stupidest).
Thank you, Guy. Beautifully put. I will not trivialize my praise w/ junkie logos...
abe smith is offline  
Old 02-12-2003, 08:52 AM   #48
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Mars
Posts: 2,231
Default

I'd prefer not to see the United States Flag burned. I also am willing to die to defend the rights of those who may do so. The only flag I own is hung upside down.

Martin Buber
John Hancock is offline  
Old 02-12-2003, 09:07 AM   #49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: here
Posts: 738
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Beyelzu
I do think that they most definitely have the right to burn said flag.
I respectfully disagree. Where are we given such a right to burn anything we want? The First Amendment literally applies to speech.

"Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech"

Let's take a look at that word using definitions from www.dictionary.com

speech The faculty or act of speaking. The faculty or act of expressing or describing thoughts, feelings, or perceptions by the articulation of words. Something spoken; an utterance. Vocal communication; conversation. A formal spoken communication delivered to an audience. Communication by word of mouth. Something spoken

Burning flags is as protected Constitutionally as burning crosses or burning firewood.
Ultron is offline  
Old 02-12-2003, 09:08 AM   #50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: here
Posts: 738
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ex-idaho
Thats ridiculous. The flag is a symbol and does not embody anything. Maybe if more people put more thought and attention into actual actions instead of worrying about stupid symbols then maybe the rest of the world wouldn't burn our flag!
Sometimes a flag is just a flag.
Ultron is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.