FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2003, 09:43 AM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
Default

Partial post (on height question):
Quote:
Life expectancy has also increased. Whether it's due to diet or not is irrelevant, we're not discussing evolution, but rather trends.
A 'trend' that goes back 250 years could hardly be assumed to have begun 2 millenia ago or more. Whether it's due to diet or not is supremely relevant since the diet of 1st Century Gallilee may have been excellent. It makes no sense to talk about '250 years' without designating a geographic location: there may be aboriginal populations extant whose diet is the same as it was 250 years ago.

Cheers!
leonarde is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:45 AM   #62
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Default

Quote:
then there's a close to zero percent chance that the blood and/or body image was painted. Why? Because paint/pigment liquifies at such high temperatures: the images would have followed the laws of physics and "run". There's no evidence of that. Another finding of the STURP team.
LOL. At what "such high temperatures?" 961 centigrade!!?

Well, let's think about this a bit. If leonard(e)'s arguments hold true, then the entire cloth ought to have gone up in flames "at such high temperatures." And yet it didn't. Truly miraculous.

The silver box melted, yes. And by most accounts it's the silver that charred the cloth. But all that mfaber is suggesting is that the ambient temperature was uncomfortably toasty -- not entirely unbelievable if one has been in a fire. I added to this simple observation by noting that it only had to achieve 60 degrees, before most proteins denature.
Principia is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:49 AM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

Foolery, sir, does walk about the orb like the sun, it shines every where.




Twelfth Night 3.1.38-39
keyser_soze is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:49 AM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
Default

Partial post:
Quote:
Sure leonard(e), let's count.

Let's start right here:
I was referring to (and I made it explicit): this thread . On past Shroud of Turin threads I found my most, uh, energetic interlocutors ignorant of the subject and proud of that ignorance.
So I merely used the opportunities to give lurkers (ie readers of these pages) references for a deeper knowledge. Speaking of which: the best recent book on the subject is : "The Blood and the Shroud: new evidence that the world's most sacred relic is real / Ian Wilson. (1998)

Cheers!
leonarde is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:51 AM   #65
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Principia
LOL. At what "such high temperatures?" 961 centigrade!!?

Well, let's think about this a bit. If leonard(e)'s arguments hold true, then the entire cloth ought to have gone up in flames "at such high temperatures." And yet it didn't. Truly miraculous.

The silver box melted, yes. And by most accounts it's the silver that charred the cloth. But all that mfaber is suggesting is that the ambient temperature was uncomfortably toasty -- not entirely unbelievable if one has been in a fire. I added to this simple observation by noting that it only had to achieve 60 degrees, before most proteins denature.
Perhaps they were using a firesafe vault?
keyser_soze is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:52 AM   #66
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Default

Incidentally, the melting point of red iron oxide (red ochre) is about 3000 degrees centigrade, according to this source.
Principia is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:53 AM   #67
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by leonarde
Partial post:

I was referring to (and I made it explicit): this thread . On past Shroud of Turin threads I found my most, uh, energetic interlocutors ignorant of the subject and proud of that ignorance.
So I merely used the opportunities to give lurkers (ie readers of these pages) references for a deeper knowledge. Speaking of which: the best recent book on the subject is : "The Blood and the Shroud: new evidence that the world's most sacred relic is real / Ian Wilson. (1998)

Cheers!
Don't you think that it would be best to first support your assertions amongst the simplest of rebuttals before others would feel obliged to go visit your links? You pretty much rebutted your own arguments for us...we only threw in the catcalls and made sure that others were aware of how weak the arguments were.
keyser_soze is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:54 AM   #68
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Default

Quote:
I was referring to (and I made it explicit): this thread . On past Shroud of Turin threads I found my most, uh, energetic interlocutors ignorant of the subject and proud of that ignorance.
Well, I think this is a good response to keyser's question about leonard(e)'s motivation here. He is condescending alright.

But, honestly, I don't care what you're referring to. You spam without restraint, here and elsewhere. Only julbon and mturner could be proud.
Principia is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 10:01 AM   #69
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: North America
Posts: 1,603
Default

Partial post:
Quote:
The silver box melted, yes.
Correction: PART OF the silver box melted. Or at least part of the outside of the silver box. But since we don't know how long the cloth was subjected to the heat and calculations of temperature differentials are .....speculative, I find the fire a wash as to bearing on authenticity. But for some experts, for some purposes the fire has some bearing on the likeliness of specific pigments having been used. So, for instance, Isabel Piczek when talking about Vermilion had this to say:
Quote:
Vermilion:
Vermilion is mercuric sulfide. Because it repels water it does not mix well with the medieval aqueous mediums. It is erratically permanent and highly unstable. It turns black exposed to light, air and through chemical reactions with other pigments and materials, when suspended in convertible mediums. It also turns black due to heat and fire such as the 1532 fire in the Chambery Chapel. Because of these known, highly unstable qualities, artists did not use vermilion on paintings to be exposed to the elements or on walls. It would have turned black in any case by now, but not likely that it would have been used in the first place, unless on less important copies of the Shroud.
Above from: http://shroud.com/piczek.htm
A very valuable document called "Is the Shroud of Turin a Painting?".

Cheers!
leonarde is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 10:05 AM   #70
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: anywhere
Posts: 1,976
Default

Quote:
It is erratically permanent and highly unstable. It turns black exposed to light, air and through chemical reactions with other pigments and materials, when suspended in convertible mediums.
Speaking of color changes to pigments. Does anyone know what the color of coagulated blood normally is (because y'know, Jesus's blood ain't normal! )
Principia is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.