FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-25-2003, 07:02 AM   #21
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Arrow

Quote:
Originally posted by GeoTheo
Does it bug you that you can't put us into a neat little category and make assumptions about what we believe without asking us?
The same why I can't make assumptions about what a person believes when they call them selves an "atheist" besides one basic point?
No. You obviously only read the part of my post that you objected to most. At the bottom, I clearly state that people are different. My point, which apparently sailed right over your head, was that we shouldn't be grouped like that, but treated as individuals.

As for the second sentence of yours above, I don't know if you were typing too quickly or what, but it's incoherent, and I'm not sure what you're trying to say. I'll try to briefly address what I think it says: atheists (like myself) have in common a lack of belief in god(s). Beyond that, our opinions on everything else vary as much as the next random group of people.
Shake is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 07:02 AM   #22
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Grizzly
Hi Geotheo,

I'll give you a little background about my post. I also participate at another BB called ChristianForums. I have seen a number of the posters over there state that Atheists have no morals because they don't believe in God (implying that they DO have morals because they believe in God). But when I started to think about it, there really aren't alot of behaviors that Christians agree on as being moral/immoral other that those that we ALL seem to agree on. I think the root of the problem is that many Christians disagree about biblical interpretation, and with God being relatively incommunicado with his creation, there is no one around to clarify.
I'm familiar with what most groups of Christians believe. It can be done. Then if I want to be more clear about waht an individual person believes, the best thing to do is just ask them. I will say this: When I was looking for a new Church after I was asked to leave the Fundamentalist Baptist Church, I visited, a Roman Catholic church, an ELCA Lutheran church, a presbyterian USA church and a nondenominational Bible Church. All were remarkably similar. The only church I have been to that was vastly diferent is a UU church. That would probably shock the fundamentalist Baptists that they are not actuall that unique and that they have much in common with mainline protestant Churches. I would say the Bible church and the Baptist Church are virtually identical in what they believe other than the fact that people dress more casual and don't want to be percieved as judgemental fundies. The doctrine and the way the service is set up is virtually the same.
GeoTheo is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 07:06 AM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shake
No. You obviously only read the part of my post that you objected to most. At the bottom, I clearly state that people are different. My point, which apparently sailed right over your head, was that we shouldn't be grouped like that, but treated as individuals.

As for the second sentence of yours above, I don't know if you were typing too quickly or what, but it's incoherent, and I'm not sure what you're trying to say. I'll try to briefly address what I think it says: atheists (like myself) have in common a lack of belief in god(s). Beyond that, our opinions on everything else vary as much as the next random group of people.
Your right I'm sorry. Good points. Yes it is intimate. Glad you said that.
GeoTheo is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 07:21 AM   #24
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: here
Posts: 121
Default

It bugs me personally when christians dont accept that a people created association, such as christianity, will be prone to error, untruth, corruption, bigotry and disorganisation simply because it is run by people, and even try to defend it. Just look at the state of the guidebook! Christianity appears to have lost sight of god, and lets face it, modern christianity is nothing more than a brand name offering cut price salvation, brighter whites and a zesty spring freshness, half price on Sundays!
Inconnu is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 07:41 AM   #25
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: an inaccessible island fortress
Posts: 10,638
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by keyser_soze
Biff is caustic? Are you serious? Magus is caustic, gunnysgt is caustic, hell...even I am caustic....but Biff?
I think by "caustic" he means my annoying habit of pointing out hypocrisy. I mean it's very hard to make your point that all Christians are together in solidarity when some wise-en-highmer has to mention out all the times you've bashed Roman Catholics. Oh well that's what the "ignore" control is all about.
Personally it doesn't bother me to talk about GeoTheo if I can't talk to him. Personal comments deleted
Biff the unclean is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 07:52 AM   #26
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
Default

we agree that charlton heston is the greatest actor of our time
fatherphil is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 08:21 AM   #27
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Recluse
Posts: 9,040
Default

Only because Jodie Foster didn't get the Pharoah's Daughter role.

(not enough good women's roles in biblical flicks to make this make good sense - but maybe that hints at potential disagreement from the female christians...)

Rhea is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 11:29 AM   #28
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,264
Default

What do Christians agree on?

So far the only thing I've found as a common thread between the christian denominations is that at church sponsor dinner functions, Jell-O mixed with marshmallows (and/or whipped cream) is considered a desert and Jell-O mixed with fruit is considered a salad. This was determined by my keen sense of observation about the placement of these food items on the buffet line. Plain Jell-O is an exceedingly rare find.
ImGod is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 12:00 PM   #29
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,671
Default

Unitarians are usually atheists or agnostics who need to get together and socialize on Sunday morning. They tend to worship the coffeepot.

Opera Nut is offline  
Old 04-25-2003, 04:48 PM   #30
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Biff the unclean
I think by "caustic" he means my annoying habit of pointing out hypocrisy. I mean it's very hard to make your point that all Christians are together in solidarity when some wise-en-highmer has to mention out all the times you've bashed Roman Catholics. Oh well that's what the "ignore" control is all about.
Personally it doesn't bother me to talk about GeoTheo if I can't talk to him.
You're probably right. I personally think that there is one person behind most of the fundy posts here, just running their posts through various filters. I mean, who actually believes that metacrock can type out so much crap and spell THAT BADLY? Not freaking likely. Some turfing going on if you ask me.
keyser_soze is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.