FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-06-2003, 03:56 PM   #11
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
Default

It's hard to say, specifically, as I don't know that much about it, but that's really why I find it interesting. I was raised only with knowledge of secular and Jewish traditions and customs, plus the amount of (non-catholic) Christian knowledge that comes with growing up in the USA. But Catholocism seems much more interesting to me than plain old "be saved and to go heaven" Christianity. Hmmmm, specifically: saints, rosaries, purgatory, the immaculate conception, communion (and that trans-thing, ick!), the pope, Lent, etc. I find it all especially intersting, as I know so little about its internal workings, rather than what I learned in world history.

Jen

Edited to add: Oops, I meant to mention my dad is Irish Catholic, but he hasn't been in my life, and my stepdad was Roman Catholic, but he deconverted before I was born.
Ensign Steve is offline  
Old 03-06-2003, 04:02 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
Default

Jennifer,

Try http://www.vatican.va

Gemma Therese
Gemma Therese is offline  
Old 03-06-2003, 07:23 PM   #13
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JenniferD

Edited to add: Oops, I meant to mention my dad is Irish Catholic, but he hasn't been in my life, and my stepdad was Roman Catholic, but he deconverted before I was born.
Hello Jen. The Catholic church is interesting and did you notice that we have a whole dictionary on Mary? You, as an individual, don't have to believe any of it and it is impossible for Catholics to know all of it. Judaism is interesting but I do not know much about Judaism.

I think Irish Catholics are Roman Catholics but maybe just a little bit more Catholic than some of the others.
 
Old 03-06-2003, 07:40 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Writer@Large
Yes. The concept of immaculate conception stems from a need to keep Jesus as clean and holy as possible, so the Catholics had to invent a story by which even his *mother* was free of sin, so she couldn't pass on the stain of Sin to Jesus. AFAIK, only the Catholics take immaculate conception seriously.

--W@L
It allowed the adoration of Mary. The church made her sinless and sexless, a perpetual virgin. This was necessary because the church had placed the Father and Jesus in so exalted a position that they were cut off from the illiterate and unschooled masses the church sought to control. The church could not lower the status of the Father or Jesus so it raised Mary to near divine status and created an entirely new way to scam the poor souls they should have been helping.

JT
Infidelettante is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 05:47 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
Default

I am constantly amazed at the number of Protestant-flavored attacks on Catholicism I see on this board ... from atheists ... eh, Amos?



Gemma Therese
Gemma Therese is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 07:47 AM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default

Just about everybody including a fair number of good catholics= ("born Catholics" they'll be more than glad to tell you Outsiders who'll NEVER be able to measure-up; even tho all the first "christians" including the Mother of God & the Apostles were all converts) tend to get WRONG the difference between the "immaculate conception" of Mary (Her own allegedly having -been-conceived -(sexually., just like all the rest of us)... FREE from the stain of Original Sin = in order to have been worthy to have been "Theotokos" = the alleged Mother of God),

as distinguished from that whole-'nother Thang = the alleged NONsexual, = parthenogenetic pregnancy of the same Mary , with *Jesus* her human kid; WITHOUT ANY FERTILIZATION BY A HUMAN MALE (father)'s sperm cell. Call this the Virgin Conception/Virgin Birth = alleged, of their Lord, Jesus.

Everybody now got this stuff STRAIGHT for once? The Immaculate Conception is *NOT * the Virgin Birth. Mary at Lourdes is alleged to have said "I (sic) am the Immmaculate Conception." Remembering that allegation might help keep the difference straight.

And once again, I'd like to mention my short (one page) 1996 paper, __Congratulations He's a Girl___, which points out in plain biological terms that if that (it's in the Creed, frcrisesake!)
primary RC dogma WERE TRUE, then the inescapably-
cognitively-dissonant FACT has to be that
JESUS WAS A *FEMALE*. = no Y = Human MALE, chromosome.

And how 'bout it, Gemma Therese & Amos? Yous haven't
dealt w/ this yet. No Catholic has deigned to deal w/ this.
abe smith is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 08:25 AM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma Therese
I am constantly amazed at the number of Protestant-flavored attacks on Catholicism I see on this board ... from atheists ...
How exactly are "Protestant-flavored" criticisms of Catholocism different from general criticisms of Catholocism? Is it because we're criticizing the Mary concept specifically? Of course we think the immaculate conception is silly. We think Jesus worship is silly, too, but this thread is about Mary.

--W@L
Writer@Large is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 08:48 AM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by abe smith
And once again, I'd like to mention my short (one page) 1996 paper, __Congratulations He's a Girl___, which points out in plain biological terms that if that (it's in the Creed, frcrisesake!)
primary RC dogma WERE TRUE, then the inescapably-
cognitively-dissonant FACT has to be that
JESUS WAS A *FEMALE*. = no Y = Human MALE, chromosome.
Because so much of the other stuff in this fairy tale is based on scientific fact. Seriously, do you have that paper online? Can you give us a link? I'd love to read it.

Jen
Ensign Steve is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 08:57 AM   #19
Contributor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Gemma Therese
I am constantly amazed at the number of Protestant-flavored attacks on Catholicism I see on this board ... from atheists ... eh, Amos?



Gemma Therese
Gemma there is not one single attack on Catholicism on this thread. If you disagree please quote the attack for me. All I see are questions and answers about Catholic beliefs. A discussion is not an attack. This persecution complex you seem to have is not endearing.
Godless Dave is offline  
Old 03-07-2003, 08:58 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Godless Dave
Gemma there is not one single attack on Catholicism on this thread. If you disagree please quote the attack for me. All I see are questions and answers about Catholic beliefs. A discussion is not an attack. This persecution complex you seem to have is not endearing.
What a shame -- and I was trying so hard to be endearing!

Gemma Therese
Gemma Therese is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:39 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.