Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
03-06-2003, 03:56 PM | #11 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
|
It's hard to say, specifically, as I don't know that much about it, but that's really why I find it interesting. I was raised only with knowledge of secular and Jewish traditions and customs, plus the amount of (non-catholic) Christian knowledge that comes with growing up in the USA. But Catholocism seems much more interesting to me than plain old "be saved and to go heaven" Christianity. Hmmmm, specifically: saints, rosaries, purgatory, the immaculate conception, communion (and that trans-thing, ick!), the pope, Lent, etc. I find it all especially intersting, as I know so little about its internal workings, rather than what I learned in world history.
Jen Edited to add: Oops, I meant to mention my dad is Irish Catholic, but he hasn't been in my life, and my stepdad was Roman Catholic, but he deconverted before I was born. |
03-06-2003, 04:02 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
|
|
03-06-2003, 07:23 PM | #13 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I think Irish Catholics are Roman Catholics but maybe just a little bit more Catholic than some of the others. |
|
03-06-2003, 07:40 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Deep South
Posts: 889
|
Quote:
JT |
|
03-07-2003, 05:47 AM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
|
I am constantly amazed at the number of Protestant-flavored attacks on Catholicism I see on this board ... from atheists ... eh, Amos?
Gemma Therese |
03-07-2003, 07:47 AM | #16 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
|
Just about everybody including a fair number of good catholics= ("born Catholics" they'll be more than glad to tell you Outsiders who'll NEVER be able to measure-up; even tho all the first "christians" including the Mother of God & the Apostles were all converts) tend to get WRONG the difference between the "immaculate conception" of Mary (Her own allegedly having -been-conceived -(sexually., just like all the rest of us)... FREE from the stain of Original Sin = in order to have been worthy to have been "Theotokos" = the alleged Mother of God),
as distinguished from that whole-'nother Thang = the alleged NONsexual, = parthenogenetic pregnancy of the same Mary , with *Jesus* her human kid; WITHOUT ANY FERTILIZATION BY A HUMAN MALE (father)'s sperm cell. Call this the Virgin Conception/Virgin Birth = alleged, of their Lord, Jesus. Everybody now got this stuff STRAIGHT for once? The Immaculate Conception is *NOT * the Virgin Birth. Mary at Lourdes is alleged to have said "I (sic) am the Immmaculate Conception." Remembering that allegation might help keep the difference straight. And once again, I'd like to mention my short (one page) 1996 paper, __Congratulations He's a Girl___, which points out in plain biological terms that if that (it's in the Creed, frcrisesake!) primary RC dogma WERE TRUE, then the inescapably- cognitively-dissonant FACT has to be that JESUS WAS A *FEMALE*. = no Y = Human MALE, chromosome. And how 'bout it, Gemma Therese & Amos? Yous haven't dealt w/ this yet. No Catholic has deigned to deal w/ this. |
03-07-2003, 08:25 AM | #17 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,198
|
Quote:
--W@L |
|
03-07-2003, 08:48 AM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, Georgia, United States
Posts: 1,235
|
Quote:
Jen |
|
03-07-2003, 08:57 AM | #19 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: With 10,000 lakes who needs a coast?
Posts: 10,762
|
Quote:
|
|
03-07-2003, 08:58 AM | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: new york
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
Gemma Therese |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|