FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-12-2003, 07:13 AM   #151
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kimpatsu
Homphobia is a disease of the right-wing mind.
See, it's all up there.
The more space you have in your head, the more it can be filled with prejudiced nonsense.
Accepting your premise, it would seem logical that anal sex appeals to the left-wing mind.
dk is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:16 AM   #152
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
Accepting your premise, it would seem logical that anal sex appeals to the left-wing mind.
No, it appeals to those into anal sex.
It just doesn't offend the non-conservative.
Or the non-prejudiced.
Kimpatsu is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:19 AM   #153
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kimpatsu
No, it appeals to those into anal sex.
It just doesn't offend the non-conservative.
Or the non-prejudiced.
So do you find anal sex more tolerable than conservatives?
dk is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:22 AM   #154
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
So do you find anal sex more tolerable than conservatives?
I find all actions between consenting adults more tolerable than attempts to interfere in said actions.
Kimpatsu is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 07:32 AM   #155
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kimpatsu
I find all actions between consenting adults more tolerable than attempts to interfere in said actions.
Since adultary, conspiracy, blackmail, and slander are acts between consenting adults, you must find them tolerable. What acts between children are toleratable?
dk is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 08:13 AM   #156
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
Since adultary, conspiracy, blackmail, and slander are acts between consenting adults, you must find them tolerable. What acts between children are toleratable?
People who suffer slander, adultery, conspiracy or blackmail most definitely do not consent. When did you last find an adult who was willingly blackmailed? Or slandered?
Between children? What do you mean? Stealing candy?
Kimpatsu is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 09:43 AM   #157
dk
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,774
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Kimpatsu
People who suffer slander, adultery, conspiracy or blackmail most definitely do not consent. When did you last find an adult who was willingly blackmailed? Or slandered?
Between children? What do you mean? Stealing candy?
first...
A person can't participate in slander, adultery, conspiracy, backmail or slander without giving their concent. Other people suffer the harm.

second...
Children can't enter into a binding contract because they lack the legal standing. Little boys can, and do, enter into concentual sex. So what's the harm of little boys entering into concentual sex with an adult?
dk is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 10:03 AM   #158
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 5,393
Question

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
Since adultary, conspiracy, blackmail, and slander are acts between consenting adults...
huh?
Dr Rick is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 12:50 PM   #159
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 179
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by dk
first...
A person can't participate in slander, adultery, conspiracy, backmail or slander without giving their concent. Other people suffer the harm.
- slander involveds whoes concent? the person doesn't have to either know it or physically be there to be a victim of slander.
- adultery requires breaking an established contract without concent, meaning there must be at least three parties involved with one unconsent to be an adultery, or it is just called polygamy.
- conspiracy involves at least one party gainning from anthoer party without its knowledge, if the affected party gave its concent, then acknowledgement of such plan is de facto known to the other party, and in such case we just call it a contract.
- blackmail is the same thing, it is a blackmail only if there are terms in the contract which are enforced without consent, with consent we just call it contract.

and i thought the slippery slope was already horrendous enough
Tani is offline  
Old 04-12-2003, 04:14 PM   #160
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,126
Default

This isn't a slippery slope, it's a bloody precipice. (personal comment in re another user deleted by moderator)
Kimpatsu is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:00 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.