FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-05-2002, 05:02 PM   #41
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by diana:
<strong>

I don't know if taboos are in place so people will break them, but I do know they have that effect.

d</strong>
Hi diana, I really don't know if sexual taboos exist to provoke lust but since "I owe you one" (from way back) I thought that this answer would surely befuddle you enough to get even.

On second thought, if people are anything like rabits, taboos such as separation in the case with rabits is required to provoke desire.

All protestant churches will freely admid--if not boast--that "the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only" wherefore the laws were given to Moses not in effort to stop sin but to convict man of sin. Combined this spells that sin is good to firstly please Moses and secondly Jesus Christ who himself was convicted as sinner and showed us the way as sinners. So therefore, sin is good and sin does not lead people away from salvation because salvation itself does not require a state of acquired righteousness but rather needs a state of acquired sinfullness.

They do have that effect, don't they?

[ August 05, 2002: Message edited by: Amos ]</p>
 
Old 08-05-2002, 05:09 PM   #42
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by excreationist:
<strong>diana:
Sin creates a need for salvation... I mean what's the point of salvation if there isn't any problem that needs fixing?</strong>
You are wrong here because sin is like the bait of a fisherman to catch the big one. The big one is not the sin but the human nature of man wherein we are alienated from God. This is the reason why sin is mythology specific and can vary within one mythology from one area to another.
 
Old 08-05-2002, 05:51 PM   #43
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 6,471
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Amos:
<strong>

Hi diana, I really don't know if sexual taboos exist to provoke lust but since "I owe you one" (from way back) I thought that this answer would surely befuddle you enough to get even.</strong>
Is <a href="http://iidb.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=16&t=000800&p=4" target="_blank">this</a> what you still owe me for? (That was such a fun thread.)

And don't worry, Amos. You always befuddle me. Oddly enough, it's part of your charm.

We really did miss you.

Quote:
On second thought, if people are anything like rabits, taboos such as separation in the case with rabits is required to provoke desire.
Some people are like rabbits, yes.

Quote:
All protestant churches will freely admid--if not boast--that "the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only" wherefore the laws were given to Moses not in effort to stop sin but to convict man of sin.
Yes. Without a law to break, there is no crime. I'm with you so far.

Quote:
Combined this spells that sin is good to firstly please Moses and secondly Jesus Christ who himself was convicted as sinner and showed us the way as sinners.
If Christ was convicted as a sinner and showed us the way, do you mean that we should all be convicted as sinners and be nailed to a tree then?

Quote:
So therefore, sin is good and sin does not lead people away from salvation because salvation itself does not require a state of acquired righteousness but rather needs a state of acquired sinfullness.
IOWs, how dare we make Christ's sacrifice meaningless by not sinning?

d
diana is offline  
Old 08-05-2002, 07:32 PM   #44
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
<strong>Originally posted by diana:
Some people are like rabbits, yes. </strong>

Sorry about the spelling but rabbits are funny that way.<strong>

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All protestant churches will freely admid--if not boast--that "the cross of eternal salvation is for sinners only" wherefore the laws were given to Moses not in effort to stop sin but to convict man of sin.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. Without a law to break, there is no crime. I'm with you so far.</strong>

Good, because if we are set free from the law there can be no sin, and of course, it was for liberty that Christ freed us [from the law], Gal.5:1. Note that Christ here is not the historical Jesus who himself became fully Christ but not until after his own resurrection.<strong>

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Combined this spells that sin is good to firstly please Moses and secondly Jesus Christ who himself was convicted as sinner and showed us the way as sinners.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If Christ was convicted as a sinner and showed us the way, do you mean that we should all be convicted as sinners and be nailed to a tree then?</strong>

Well what would be wrong with that if we can walk away from it? and how do you know that the crucifixion parable was not an allegory? In any case, it is much better if we can walk away from it instead of dying at the foot of the cross with the burning desire to ascend--which is the only reasonable alternative for conscientious believers. <strong>

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So therefore, sin is good and sin does not lead people away from salvation because salvation itself does not require a state of acquired righteousness but rather needs a state of acquired sinfullness.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IOWs, how dare we make Christ's sacrifice meaningless by not sinning?

d
</strong>
Ah, but Jesus died to set Christ free (read carefully and don't believe the preacher). It was the crucifixion of Jesus that allowed Son of Man (here called Bar-abbas) to be set free because Pilate hath said three times that he could find no fault with the man and allowed the Jews to crucify the imposter called Jesus (Mt.27:64) according to Jewish law (not civil law).

Thanks for your welcome and hope your summer was great. No I am not really back but could not resist the temptation (how wretched I am).

[ August 05, 2002: Message edited by: Amos ]</p>
 
Old 08-06-2002, 02:20 PM   #45
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,288
Lightbulb

Just a thought: How did Adam and Eve know that it was wrong to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. They wouldn't have had a concept of right and wrong until after they ate the fruit.
Defiant Heretic is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 02:41 PM   #46
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Defiant Heretic:
<strong>Just a thought: How did Adam and Eve know that it was wrong to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. They wouldn't have had a concept of right and wrong until after they ate the fruit.</strong>
Hello Defiant, you should real it for yourself, carefully and preferably in a Catholic bible. You will find that "woman saw that the apple was pleasing to the eyes, good for food and desirable for gaining wisdom." It was for this reason that she had some and gave some to her husband. Adam and Eve were not in existence at this time and do not come into the scene until God said "Adam where are you?" Adam was conjectered into the mind of man to become the second identity we now call our ego consciousness.
 
Old 08-06-2002, 03:15 PM   #47
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,288
Question

I'm not really sure what you're saying here, Amos.
Would you care to clarify?
Defiant Heretic is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 03:30 PM   #48
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,288
Post

Quote:
originally posted by excreationist:
1. The garden was in Eden, but specifically where was Eden.
Well the Bible talks about four rivers that flow out of it, but the Garden and the rivers were "...destroyed by the Flood. Its actual location on the globe can never be established..." (from ChristianAnswers.net)
I don't know what maps they're looking at. The four rivers mentioned are the Pishon, the Gihon, the Tigris, and the Euphrates. The Tigris and Euphrates are major rivers in the mid-east. The Pishon and Gihon are either dried up or named something else. (or else they never existed and were just made up so no one could try and verify the story) but there are several small rivers in that area.

This map shows the Mesopotamian area, along with the rivers: <a href="http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/atlas_middle_east/iraq.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/atlas_middle_east/iraq.jpg</a>
Defiant Heretic is offline  
Old 08-06-2002, 07:24 PM   #49
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The four rivers do not have to be on the map because Gen.2:10-14 is an allegory that describes the journey of life.

The river of life rises in Eden and beyond there it divides and becomes four branches. The first is the Phison. This river winds throught the entire land such as we are when we are in pursuit of power wealth and beauty. We will find gold there and bdellium and lapis lazuli we use to decorate our ego awareness.

The second river also winds throught this same land and brings pain, sorrow and dispair in equal amounts because pleasure cannot be conceived the exist without pain, both must exist to the same degree.

The third river rises from the East from where we left to go West because we could not go East from East of Eden. Our entrance upon this river is the beginning of Purgatory (the Yang period) intil we arrive at the Euphrates which just "is" as in "I am." Eu-phrates means bright mind and signifies that we have come full circle in life.

This passage describes the plan of salvation even from before the fall of man and so God did not have a surpise when man sinned from which follows that Jesus did not pay the price for your sins.

[ August 06, 2002: Message edited by: Amos ]</p>
 
Old 08-06-2002, 07:34 PM   #50
Amos
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Defiant Heretic:
<strong>I'm not really sure what you're saying here, Amos.
Would you care to clarify?</strong>
I am telling you that man and woman ate from the apple because woman saw that the apple was good for gaining wisdom etc. Adam and Eve are not the same characters as man and woman but are created here to become the self consciousness of man. Hence the "naked to wit/no shame" and "no longer naked to wit/felt shame" distinction between Gen.2 and Gen.3.
 
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.