Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-06-2003, 07:48 AM | #181 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2003, 08:21 AM | #182 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2003, 08:52 AM | #183 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Posts: 6,303
|
Quote:
Must have been in the stars. |
|
08-06-2003, 09:03 AM | #184 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Shadowy Planet
Posts: 7,585
|
Quote:
Then you can show a strong correlation between the position of the planets and major earthquakes around the world. I'm sure there are plenty of scientists who would like to see that. Then all one need do is look for the causal connection. |
|
08-06-2003, 11:20 AM | #185 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2003, 11:39 AM | #186 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
|
|
08-06-2003, 04:47 PM | #187 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,335
|
Quote:
There is a really big difference between producing data to fit your hypothesis and adjusting your hypothesis to fit your data. One of these is a validated scientific process, the other is pseudoscientifc gobbledy-gook. Care to guess which is which? |
|
08-06-2003, 11:15 PM | #188 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
Quote:
There is a simple arithmetic relation to verify, nothing else. Please verify the given data with the given algorithm, argue on the subject, for example on the significance of the relation of planetary angle distances and earthquakes, and stop your loud fantasies about I fitting data. You do assert, that I fit data, that i adjust something, in reply to my post, without any proof or need. Strange understanding of science. I have learned, that verificition is an adequate tool in science to examine phenomena on significance. In this case it needs a simple verification using given math and logic. |
|
08-07-2003, 02:35 AM | #189 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: --
Posts: 622
|
In the beginning of this month, I have given some answers to Patrick, who was interest in engineering the sun sign of a baby. In addition to that, I have given a hint to him, because I know, he is interested on earthquakes, etc. : ” BTW. Around the date of 2003.08.27 there are some geometric planetary geocentric configurations relating to energeticful crash's and earthquakes.” I have given him this hint, because it seems, that some special geometric configurations of the sky objects of the solar system, have coincidences with such events. This is based on some known significant correlations to me, one can verify by science methods. To inform some skeptics here, I have given examples of such significant relations through a simple algorithm, which can calculate an arbitrary index value of such geometries, and through some graphs showing this through the coincidence in time of a high index value and a major earthquake. AFAIR, no one, who is reading here, has replied he/she likes to verify that stuff seriously using scientific methods, what is mainly math.
Because of this truth, I close on this. Thank you. Volker |
08-07-2003, 08:52 PM | #190 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It would have been more timely if I'd found this a few days ago...
Quote:
By the way, disaster of some type looms in +/-20 days for those keeping watch. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|