Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-22-2003, 02:07 PM | #281 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: a
Posts: 770
|
I think atheism entails belief, but not religious belief by the usual definition of the word. It's simply the belief that there is/are no God(s), everything else can vary from person to person. Heck, there are Buddhists who are atheists and I once even encountered an atheist who believed in ghosts. So... as long as not believing in unfalsifiable assertions does not count as religious belief, atheism is not a religion.
|
08-22-2003, 02:51 PM | #282 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 1,930
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does atheism entail religious beliefs?
Quote:
|
|
08-22-2003, 06:25 PM | #283 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: California
Posts: 454
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Does atheism entail religious beliefs?
Originally posted by Charles Darwin
What is the strawman that you think I am advancing? Quote:
|
|
08-25-2003, 03:05 AM | #284 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 5,878
|
My Collins Concise English Dictionary defines Atheism as a belief that there is no God.
I think it is incorrect. Non-belief cannot be belief, any more than a person can be in two different places simultaneously. An atheist might be tempted to say: “I believe there is np God,” but that statement is synonymous with the statements: “I believe fairies / Santa Clause do not exists. I believe that the moon is not made of cheese (except where samples were taken by the Apollo moon landings) /that we do not grow two heads when it’s so dark we can’t see” or any other nonsense. In these contexts, “I believe” means: “In the absence of persuasive evidence that these things are real or true, I conclude that they aren’t.” This does not entail a belief system. It entails a judgment. A judgment of this sort should never be confused with a religious belief which has an internal origin and has absolutely nothing to do with “evidence” of the sort we might seek when deciding that a cake is properly baked, or that the clock on the office wall is two minutes slow, or that the nation’s leader is mentally de-arranged. Non-belief, as has been pointed out three billion times, is absence of belief. Like when you’ve sucked all the air out of a chamber, the chamber cannot be said to contain air. When belief doesn’t exist, there is no belief. (It seems quite straightforward to me.) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|