FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-09-2003, 12:25 PM   #51
Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Gilead
Posts: 11,186
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
An enormous amount of thought went into the formation of the Soviet Union, too.
You're comparing a sex change to the formation of the USSR? A little sore from that stretch?

Quote:
I think medical science has nothing to offer in this matter. Worse than nothing, actually.
Good thing you're not in need of a sex change, then. What would be worse than nothing is to try to sweep them all under the rug, as if they don't exist--when the medical technology is there to help them.
Roland98 is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 12:38 PM   #52
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 279
Default

Quote:
An enormous amount of thought went into the formation of the Soviet Union, too.
And? The thoughts of how to grasp and mantain power of a country while changing it's economic system is not really comperable to thoughts on if a person would be happier as a man/woman or not. This is a grander non-sequitur than your pediphile remark, although not quite as strong an appeal to fear.

Do you have any rational reason why these people, who put more thought into the decision than you have put into your assumed statistics, should not be able to change their bodies?

Quote:
I think medical science has nothing to offer in this matter. Worse than nothing, actually.
Check the OP - It has a link to an interesting, if bigoted, article about how medical science can, in fact, help these people. Pretty neat.
Amaranth is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 01:09 PM   #53
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 760
Default

Whats the fuss about anyway? If people would me more happy if they change gender , more power to them. Live and let live?
JaeIsGod is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 01:31 PM   #54
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 279
Default

You really just don't know yguy, Jae. Here's his response to Canada legalizing gay marriage, including his creating of the now classic phrase "gender confusion":

http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.p...threadid=55493

He has a lot of other "good" threads on the MF&P board.
Amaranth is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 01:33 PM   #55
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY
Posts: 14,394
Arrow

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy:
I think medical science has nothing to offer in this matter. Worse than nothing, actually.
I think y(se)guy has nothing to offer in this discussion. Except of course for pointless counter "arguments," which as has been pointed out, are quite often non-sequiturs.

If you don't have anything constructive to add, you should just remain silent. We get the point that you don't agree with it. Why all the fuss?
Quote:
Originally posted by Roland98
There is an enormous amount of thought that goes into this.
Unlike your posts. After continued requests for evidence, you keep making additional silly "arguments" based on your own biased opinion. Still no evidence on your part.

Quote:
More from yguy:
I can't get my mind around the idea that anyone, having been born a man, could be happy as a woman, or vice versa. I doubt that it can really happen.
I really can't get my mind around your "arguments." Therefore, using your "logic," they must not be true. OR, I doubt that anyone can really believe them.

Anyway, that article (from the OP) just brings to light still another reason that I can't stand the Catholic Church. :banghead:
Shake is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 02:26 PM   #56
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,762
Default

Remember, weird is sinful, and ONLY yguy is allowed to assume facts not in evidence (don't think you get to use them, or he'll fuss at you). Further, yguy categorically refuses to support any statement he makes, anywhere, with any sort of evidence. He's refused point-blank demands for evidence on several occations.

But he says he's not a troll.
Calzaer is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 02:29 PM   #57
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
Default

But he says he's not a troll.

Of course he does. Trolls are weird, after all.
Mageth is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 05:11 PM   #58
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Roland98
You're comparing a sex change to the formation of the USSR? A little sore from that stretch?
Just on the off chance that you or anyone has the slightest interest in the point, it is, of course, that the amount of thought invested in an idea doesn't ensure that it is not idiotic, to say the least.

Quote:
Good thing you're not in need of a sex change, then.
People need sex-change operations like they need head amputations.

Quote:
What would be worse than nothing is to try to sweep them all under the rug, as if they don't exist--when the medical technology is there to help them.
It's there to help them cover up the problem by curing the symptom.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 05:18 PM   #59
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Shake
If you don't have anything constructive to add, you should just remain silent.
Perhaps, just as you and I have differing ideas about what constitutes sexual normality, we also have differing ideas about what constitutes a constructive comment.

Quote:
We get the point that you don't agree with it. Why all the fuss?
You're asking me? You think maybe I'm responding to my own posts with varying degrees of derision?

Quote:
I really can't get my mind around your "arguments." Therefore, using your "logic," they must not be true.
I didn't say the concept was wrong because I can't get my mind around it.

You guys would save yourselves a lot of time and anxiety if you'd respond to what I actually say.
yguy is offline  
Old 07-09-2003, 05:53 PM   #60
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 447
Default

Enjoying this thread, especially the deconstruction of yguy's transphobia.

I once knew a man going through the psychological and physical program in preparation for a sex change operation to become a woman. He was a great gal and I was one of her only acquaintances who ever took the time to ask 1) how she was doing and 2) nonjudgmental questions about the process. She was always eager to talk about it, and I got the impression that she didn't get many opportunities to talk about it. Unfortunately, I moved during the process and we lost touch. She still had many months to go before the doctors would make a final decision whether to actually perform the surgery. I've often thought of her and consider it my loss that we lost touch.
Quote:
Originally posted by catmar
The difference between pedophilia and transgender issues is that transgender issues only affect the one person (anyone else is being too nosy and it is not their business anyhow). Pedophilia affects the victim, the victim's family, and the jerk/b*tch who did it to the child. It is a bit different.
Of course there is a difference between pedophilia and transgender issues, but I must disagree with your opinion that transgender issues only affect the one person. Transgendered (TG) persons have people in their lives - spouses and children, parents, siblings, other relatives, friends, co-workers, etc. All of those persons are affected by a TG person's decisions regarding permanently changing their gender. As part of a TG person's support group, their concerns are valid, and it was my understanding that those concerns are addressed through counseling before permanent surgery is performed.

A few months back I saw a cable-made movie called Normal starring Tom Wilkinson and Jessica Lange as a couple married 25 years struggling through his decision to have a sex change operation and remain married to his wife. Took place in a small farming community in Iowa. I thought it was wonderfully done. It also exposed the hypocrisy of their church leaders as they shunned this devout church-going couple.

It opened my eyes a bit wider to issues faced by people I wouldn't normally come across, and that can only be a good thing.

Mrs. Heathen
nj_heathens is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:05 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.