Freethought & Rationalism Archive

GunnerJ · 11-14-2002, 08:54 PM

Actually, there was no real "deadline," and it'll have to wait till tommorrow, because the campus internet connection is acting very... um... gay. Hmm.

Anyway, thanks arrowman, I was planning on changing a lot of what you commented on.

Edited to add: OOPS HA HA, LITTLE JOKE THERE... ah, hell, just kill me.

[ November 15, 2002: Message edited by: Rimstalker ]

Arrowman · 11-14-2002, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rimstalker:
... the campus internet connection is acting very... um... gay. ... Anyway, thanks qrrowman..

You're welcome.
Love from Queer-o-Man

babelfish · 11-15-2002, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Arrowman:


You're welcome.
Love from Queer-o-Man

I almost fell off my chair laughing when I read this!

Rimstalker, I LOVED your letter! Hope it gets published.

Gallimore · 11-21-2002, 02:20 PM

Good show, rimstalker!

Hypernovean · 11-22-2002, 08:41 PM

<img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />
Very good arguments; I wonder, is it possible to see the original letter in full?

Davo · 11-29-2002, 07:03 PM

I'm sure it's probably too late to change the article now, but there's another argument against the idea that evolution would have made homosexuality extinct if it were genetic.

When we consider that homosexuals have been largely oppressed, and people have been taught to suppress homosexual inclinations, it's not surprising that homosexual people could have passed down the "gay gene" while having sex with a woman, keeping up the facade that they're heterosexual. Happens often.

Keith Russell · 11-30-2002, 07:51 PM

Greetings:

The only thing I would change is the reference to the Golden Rule, a 'rule' which is inherently flawed.

(A masochist would live by the GR quite differently than everyone else...)

Keith.

11-14-2002, 08:54 PM	#11
GunnerJ Banned Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want Posts: 4,871	Actually, there was no real "deadline," and it'll have to wait till tommorrow, because the campus internet connection is acting very... um... gay. Hmm. Anyway, thanks arrowman, I was planning on changing a lot of what you commented on. Edited to add: OOPS HA HA, LITTLE JOKE THERE... ah, hell, just kill me. [ November 15, 2002: Message edited by: Rimstalker ]</p>

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

11-21-2002, 02:20 PM	#14
Gallimore Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Pasadena, CA Posts: 36	Good show, rimstalker!

11-22-2002, 08:41 PM	#15
Hypernovean Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: - Posts: 67	<img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" /> Very good arguments; I wonder, is it possible to see the original letter in full?

11-29-2002, 07:03 PM	#16
Davo Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 23	I'm sure it's probably too late to change the article now, but there's another argument against the idea that evolution would have made homosexuality extinct if it were genetic. When we consider that homosexuals have been largely oppressed, and people have been taught to suppress homosexual inclinations, it's not surprising that homosexual people could have passed down the "gay gene" while having sex with a woman, keeping up the facade that they're heterosexual. Happens often.

11-30-2002, 07:51 PM	#17
Keith Russell Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Overland Park, Kansas Posts: 1,336	Greetings: The only thing I would change is the reference to the Golden Rule, a 'rule' which is inherently flawed. (A masochist would live by the GR quite differently than everyone else...) Keith.

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.