Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
07-17-2002, 07:19 AM | #11 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Quote:
Naturally, creationists, unlike most Christians, do not understand the concept of ‘metaphor’. How strange it must be for them to read the parables! New Testament Creation Scientists, if there are such things, must be looking for evidence for the existence of the prodigal son! Who was he? Where did he live? BRIAN: Consider the lilies... ELSIE: Consider the lilies? BRIAN: Uh, well, the birds, then. EDDIE: What birds? BRIAN: Any birds. EDDIE: Why? BRIAN: Well, have they got jobs? ARTHUR: Who? BRIAN: The birds. EDDIE: Have the birds got jobs?! FRANK: What's the matter with him? ARTHUR: He says the birds are scrounging. BRIAN: Oh, uhh, no, the point is the birds. They do all right. Don't they? FRANK: Well, good luck to 'em. EDDIE: Yeah. They're very pretty. BRIAN: Okay, and you're much more important than they are, right? So, what are you worrying about? There you are. See? EDDIE: I'm worrying about what you have got against birds. BRIAN: I haven't got anything against the birds. Consider the lilies. ARTHUR: He's having a go at the flowers now. EDDIE: Oh, give the flowers a chance. BRIAN: Ohh. Look. There was this man, and he had two servants. ARTHUR: What were they called? BRIAN: What? ARTHUR: What were their names? BRIAN: I don't know. And he gave them some talents. EDDIE: You don't know?! BRIAN: Well, it doesn't matter! ARTHUR: He doesn't know what they were called! BRIAN: Oh, they were called 'Simon' and 'Adrian'. Now-- ARTHUR: Oh! You said... EDDIE: Ohh. ARTHUR: ...you didn't know! BRIAN: It really doesn't matter. The point is there were these two servants-- ARTHUR: He's making it up as he goes along. <a href="http://graphicszone.net/monty_python/scripts/Life_of_Brian/17.htm" target="_blank">http://graphicszone.net/monty_python/scripts/Life_of_Brian/17.htm</a> TTFN, Oolon |
|
07-17-2002, 05:34 PM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
|
So I guess the answer is "NO." then?
|
07-17-2002, 05:44 PM | #13 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: St. John's, Nfld. Canada
Posts: 1,652
|
Quote:
|
|
07-17-2002, 05:54 PM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
|
Quote:
Yes abiogenesis is an unsolved mystery. However, so was gravity, evolution, viruses how DNA worked, where rain comes from, and all the other "amazingly complex to happen naturally there must be a god" phenomenon. I fail to see, once again, why you single out abiogenesis but not other "unsolved mysteries" of science. Also, if you learn about biology and chemistry, and how they work, then all of a sudden abiogenesis doesn't seem that spectacular (in a scientific "how could it have happened" sense). Learn about biofilms - that may convince you that single-celled organisms can indeed evolve into multicellular organisms. Learn about organic chemistry - that may convince you that given enough time and temperature and weird conditions (i.e. early earth), it isn't that "amazing" that amino acids and RNA molecules formed. scigirl |
|
07-18-2002, 06:49 AM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
|
Question: What is the biggest proof of evolution to an atheist?
Answer: Life. If you don't see my point then I can't see what more there is worth discussing. You obviously can't think outside the little box you have created for yourselves. Abiogenisis is obviously not a problem for an atheist. That is if he wants to remain an atheist. If you could be convinced of creation you would not be atheists. As atheists you will never see creation. Nothing will convince you against your will. All you have to do is fold your arms and frown and use your imagination and come up with a way somthing could have evolved. |
07-18-2002, 07:11 AM | #16 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
You're confused, GeoTheo. My curiosity and rationality comes before my atheism. As a curious and rational person, I want to know the truth. My "will" doesn't keep me from accepting interventional creation by some deity; it's the lack of evidence for such a creation. If there was solid evidence for such a creation, I'd accept it.
Got any? |
07-18-2002, 07:38 AM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
|
Life.
|
07-18-2002, 07:43 AM | #18 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
"Life" is evidence of an origin of life. By itself life is not evidence that supports either natural or supernatural explanations for that origin.
|
07-18-2002, 08:00 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bemidji
Posts: 1,197
|
How could it have a supernatural origin?
|
07-18-2002, 08:09 AM | #20 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
Quote:
Erm, maybe it was poofed into existence by a middle eastern sky god? Oolon |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|