Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
03-20-2003, 03:56 AM | #131 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
|
BTW, if you'll tell us which numbers are right, I will create a new nick just to give you the correct number and you shall follow my will! World domination here I come!
|
03-20-2003, 09:30 AM | #132 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 417
|
xian,
This program is for people who believe I would have great gain if a correct number is revealed. They are free to submit their numbers. You are not in this camp, obviously, and I respect your decision to not submit a number. Why is it that my devoutly christian ex-g/f, and two devoutly xtian good friends, and several devoutly christian members of this board have all attempted to channel a guess from God to me? Again, all I've done here is offered a straight-forward, in-your-face answer to those who ask the question "What would it take for you to rethink your atheism"? You are apparently not the type to ask this question, and I respect that. Please take my word for it though: there are many, many Christians who ask the question quite regularly (and to many of them, my response is sufficient). My ex-g/f, for instance, was upset that her number didn't work - but insisted that I never erase the progam, for surely, at some point in my life (she believes), the 32 numbers will come. In other words, even the believers in my life win: they can always have hope that someday, somehow, those 32 numbers will appear to me. At the very least, they know my answer to "will you ever again try to believe" is not an unconditional "no". keyer: well, the program actually checks for a higher level of omniscience than that. The random number is generated anew each test. The way it works: I type a seed, press a button, random number is generated (based on entered seed - and a couple other things), I am prompted for a "guess", guess is checked. So, the deity would actually have to know the number that would be generated at the precise moment I pushed the "Run" button, which will be different with each trial. |
03-20-2003, 10:08 AM | #133 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 378
|
well don't get me wrong, Baloo. ON some levels I admire that you have indeed left an "open door" for God. Though I am wondering if you have concluded already that this same God you left a door open to, is also the same God you have concluded is a tyrant. Is this true or false?
If you have concluded that this God is cruel due to the problem of evil, then does that not make this whole "open door" a front to the real issue- that the door is indeed closed? I am not trying to accuse you of anything, you seem to be genuine and fascinating at the least. I have talked with many, MANY atheists over the years, and have never encountered something like this. Indeed, it caught me off guard a bit. |
03-20-2003, 11:57 AM | #134 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
|
|
03-20-2003, 12:04 PM | #135 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
[deleted what was an admitted insult] |
|
03-20-2003, 12:25 PM | #136 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
i believe that many atheists would not serve a being that was despotic, bi-polar, into-bondage-and-S&M, nutjob, even if it was his master. Would you not resist such servitude? I have spoken with many atheists who have had an opinion to the effect of: "Even if your God exists, I would never serve him. I would never submit to Him. He will have to force me, because so long as I have a free will, I will choose otherwise" and even some atheists go so far as to say: "even if your God exists, I would not serve him. I prefer hell before bending my knees to your God" I do not think the slave argument is a good argument. People resist oppressive slavery- even when their masters obviously exist. But Baloo is proposing willing servitude with promises to be glad and happy about it. Even the 'best slave' STILL will maintain his mind...even though his body may serve, his mind will willingly rebel. so I maintain my original postulation. if Baloo has concluded a cruel God, I totally fail to see how his test is genuine. In my opinion, the door is already shut and his god-check is a front for something already determined. And if God exists, maybe this is why he never gets his answer. WHy would God answer someone who already concluded He was cruel? I see no logical reason why God would communicate with Baloo under this pretext. A more valid check to me would be for Baloo to see God not as a cruel being, but in a different light, and do so geninuely. Under this context, perhaps God would answer himself to Baloo. That, is, in fact, the exact context that all tests in the Bible occurred under in which God honored. but I will let Baloo speak for himself. regardless, I respect his posts, as I do believe there is sincereity in what I read from him. |
|
03-20-2003, 12:36 PM | #137 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 713
|
If I had reason to believe a sadistic god existed who would punish me for eternity for disobedience, I would worship him regardless of my feelings. I am a coward. If some human tyrant were to threaten me with torture unless I kneeled before him, I would do the same. However, I would have no illusions about that tyrant being a good leader or being worthy of my worship. Humans who crave worship are the ones least deserving of it. Decent people don't need followers groveling at their feet.
Imagine if some homeless guy claimed to be the emperor of planet Xenu, and demanded our service. No one would worry about this because he sounded so ridiculous. We don't find Christian or Muslim threats of eternal damnation any more likely than a crazy guy threatening people with imprisonment in his dungeons on Xenu. |
03-20-2003, 12:37 PM | #138 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 65
|
00000000000000000000000000000001 ?
|
03-20-2003, 12:43 PM | #139 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 378
|
Quote:
Again, Baloo is promising mental devotion...or at minimum promising to do his best to be mentally devoted. This is, of course, highly unlikely in reality. No slave is mentally devoted to a barbaric master. Sure he may obey his master's every command, but his mind will still be free. Its like what they taught me in the military regarding those who are above you in the chain of command: you must respect the rank, but you do not have to respect the man. i truly believe Baloo's Test (lol, a nice official name. he he. It will go down with Pascal's Wager. We have Baloo's Test)... I believe Baloo's Test is, at its core, disengenuious. Thus, if God does exist, no response is to be expected. (not to say one wont come IF God exists, but the test is not genuine enough to think that one should come) |
|
03-20-2003, 01:33 PM | #140 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: god's judge (pariah)
Posts: 1,281
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|