FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB General Discussion Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2003, 08:58 AM   #21
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: springfield, MA. USA
Posts: 2,482
Default Beating my immer "Jesus was a female" drum;

Well, nijjhar; i hope you know anything about human biology = genetics & reproduction?
If Their Divine Lord was born of a never-impregnated virgin human Mother, then their divine Lord was a FEMALE like its Mother; BECAUSE
The only source from which a human infant can get the MALE Y chromosome necessary to make it a human MALE is from a human MALE father. = No human male Father = no male Y chromosome. Hence the kid is a base-line human female, like the Mother. Somebody like to let the Pope know this biological FACT? = JESUS was a girl.
Actually, of course, the Y(Male) chromosome is *defective* = it lacks the (missing) arm of the X = FEMALE chromosome. Hence human males are empty-bellied and cannot incubate , nourish & birth human infants; and human males (Y-chromosome "defectives") evince numerous genetic diseases =g. variations, .from which the (perfect) X chromosome wd have protected them.
The theory is that the missing arm (from the Y chromosome) results from the evolutional advantage that it let those spermatocytes get there fastest to fertilise the waiting ovum/ova.And hence SPEED & SCORING tends to be what human males value most ever since.
In any case, these *facts* deserve consideration in arguing about those extremely-dubitable (junk) dogmata.
abe smith is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 09:09 AM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reading, U.K.
Posts: 20
Default

Hi,

My views are childish as compared with yours.
nijjhar is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 02:15 PM   #23
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Self-banned in 2005
Posts: 1,344
Question Just a question...

Hello nijjhar.

I'm curious as to whether or not you'll be reassessing the predictions at the end of your book. Also, why do you think events turned out differently?
Hugo Holbling is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 02:25 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Reading, U.K.
Posts: 20
Default

Hi,

Spirit of man knows the things of men and not of God. We try.

It could be 2007 now.
nijjhar is offline  
Old 01-03-2003, 03:10 PM   #25
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 5,047
Arrow

Quote:
Spirit of man knows the things of men and not of God.
~ making God completely useless and utterly irrelevant to humans.

Quote:
We try.
Given the first sentence, don't waste your time...unless you're just trying to sell another bill of fraudulent goods very much in the 'spirit' of the 'things of men'.

Quote:
It could be 2007 now.
Watch those red lights.
Ronin is offline  
Old 01-05-2003, 02:48 AM   #26
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,288
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by nijjhar
It could be 2007 now.
Indeed. Or it could be -639. After all, our calendar is based on an arbitrary date set for an event that may or may not have actually happened.
Defiant Heretic is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.