![]() |
Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
![]() |
#91 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: a place where i can list whatever location i want
Posts: 4,871
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#92 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
![]()
Hey Rim, do I get the impression you guys don't get along?
Oolon ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 717
|
![]()
Specified complexity is complexity that was specified, therefore, if life contains specified complexity, life was designed. It's not an argument, it's merely stating "life was designed therefore life was designed".
![]() I'm getting sick of this Ed fellow. Where are the sophisticated (*snicker*) creationist debaters? All we're getting lately are these infuriating morons who "answer" refutations of their lies with more, vaguely related, lies. |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
![]() Quote:
theyeti P.S. I use the term "functional complexity" myself in regards to creationist "information can't increase" arguments. There are lots of ways that increased functional complexity can evolve. I would avoid the term "specified complexity", because it can't evolve by definition, and will only serve to confuse people. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | |||
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Dumbski: This thing has SC. Dawkins: Here's why it doesn't. Dumbski: Well it wasn't SC then. Am I missing something? Is it really that simple -- and stupid? Oolon [ March 12, 2002: Message edited by: Oolon Colluphid ]</p> |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#96 | ||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Posts: 9,747
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
theyeti [ March 12, 2002: Message edited by: theyeti ]</p> |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
#97 | ||||||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
[b] Quote:
|
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SC
Posts: 5,908
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#99 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NCSU
Posts: 5,853
|
![]() Quote:
Do you actually have a testable hypothesis for a past function for junk DNA? Otherwise, your comment is worthless. -RvFvS |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Alibi: ego ipse hinc extermino
Posts: 12,591
|
![]()
Hi again Ed. I see you've been back. Now about those fossils...
Oolon the getting-less-patient |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|