FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-06-2003, 04:14 PM   #61
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
With what do we consider? (for clarification) .. and I'm not talking about the basic brain matter here.
The activity of brain matter is detected as thinking. How do you know you're thinking, you ask?

Hmmm. (Pause for effect)

What makes you think that thinking is anything other than stirring the porage (or porridge) between your ears?

Cheers, John
John Page is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 04:21 PM   #62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: limbo
Posts: 986
Talking John-fucious

Quote:
Originally posted by John Page
What makes you think that thinking is anything other than stirring the porage (or porridge) between your ears?
lol John, I'm looking for profundity!

You're the philosopher...come on, please let me know that you realise that thinking involves language?
Luiseach is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 06:18 PM   #63
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default Re: John-fucious

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
You're the philosopher...come on, please let me know that you realise that thinking involves language?
Not all thinking is dependent upon language. First the concept, then the word...
John Page is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:26 PM   #64
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,199
Default Re: Re: The Truth about Dog-Houses

Quote:
Originally posted by wiploc
I was quite surprised to learn that there are truths that depend on opinion. I read it in a book on contrarian investing. Examples: 1. The value of a share of IBM stock.
The value of a stock is a number assigned to it based on the opinions of potential buyers of the stock. It may be true that buyers' opinions at time X cause the dollar figure Y to be assigned to it, but at that time, the accounting department of the firm in question may be realizing that it is going bankrupt. Therefore, I submit that a stock value has a truth value comparable to that the "clothing value" of the Emperor's new clothes, which went to zero the instant the little boy pointed out the obvious.

Quote:
2. Which side of the road you should drive on.
That is a convention, not a truth, I would say. It is true that in America one should drive on the right-hand side, but the convention to do so is not superior to its opposite. Or, it is true that the convention in America is to drive on the right.

Quote:
3. Whether, in the movie Witness, the protagonist's pants were too short.
Don't know the movie; but again, sounds like a matter of convention.
yguy is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 04:13 AM   #65
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: limbo
Posts: 986
Default Re: Re: John-fucious

Quote:
Originally posted by John Page
Not all thinking is dependent upon language. First the concept, then the word...
'Concepts' derive from language, though, do they not?

How can we have 'concepts' without language...
Luiseach is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 04:40 AM   #66
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: limbo
Posts: 986
Default Re: Re: Re: The Truth about Dog-Houses

Quote:
Originally posted by yguy
...a matter of convention.
Sometimes 'truth' is a matter of convention.
Luiseach is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 07:07 AM   #67
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default LuConstruct

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
'Concepts' derive from language, though, do they not?
Concept is a word used to represent an idea, mental entity.
Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
How can we have 'concepts' without language...
We cannot talk about concepts without language, but surely mental entities must exist before we attain language to talk about them. Another argument is that one must have language concepts in order to implement a language.

Maybe the issue here is that our concept of what a concept actually is, differs.

Cheers, John
John Page is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 07:17 AM   #68
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Undetermined
Posts: 7
Default

Do you remember when you first learned to think? Which came first, learning to think or learning a language? Or is original thinking a kind of private language?
fallowcypher is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 07:41 AM   #69
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
Default Re: LuConstruct

Quote:
Originally posted by John Page

We cannot talk about concepts without language,
Wrong. Define "talking about a concept" and "concept".

Nonverbal language ? Plays a huge role in human communication.
Quote:
but surely mental entities must exist before we attain language to talk about them.
which would explain why people are never lost for words, or have problems expressing or even recognising their feelings, or why legal language is so extraordinarily convoluted --- in order to specify something.
or IOW, huh ?

Quote:
Another argument is that one must have language concepts in order to implement a language.
Oh dear.
Concepts as inherent properties ?
Taking Chomsky way, way into cognitive psychology, aren't you ?
Quote:
Maybe the issue here is that our concept of what a concept actually is, differs.
uh, yes.
Gurdur is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 07:43 AM   #70
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: US
Posts: 5,495
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fallowcypher
Do you remember when you first learned to think? Which came first, learning to think or learning a language? Or is original thinking a kind of private language?
...or is private language just a deconstructionist excuse for not having a sensible answer? Even if a private language existed, if it inherits all the characteristics of public or formal languages IMO it is still subject to the same limitations and still needs to be implemented.

BTW, I can remember thinking thoughts that there were no words to express. Hence my inclination to philosophical thought.

Cheers, john
John Page is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.