Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
01-25-2003, 08:10 PM | #11 | |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
|
Re: Re: demonic possession vs. mental illness
Quote:
For example, auditive hallucinations in schizophrenic subjects.... the " I can hear voices and they are telling me to do this or that". My mother used to have such hallucinations... a voice insulting her. She even claimed to feel a hand pushing her to make her fall. Each time she did fall. It is a terrible illness. If you have seen the movie "Sybille" ( sorry for the spelling not sure) she would even have different voices as her different personalities " took over". If I were to believe that demonic activity is present in any mental illness IMO that disorder would be a candidate. Maybe someone has more info about it or knows a link which explains what medical research has been done on multiple personalities disorder. |
|
01-26-2003, 06:37 AM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mind of the Other
Posts: 886
|
Quote:
Also, it is easy to imitate the phonetic sounds of another language, especially in the presense of those who do not understand the language. For example, I am quite able to give English a Chinese or German accent, if I can capture the features of Chinese or German. So "speaking-in-tongues" might not be quite so "miraculous" as people have claimed. |
|
01-26-2003, 07:57 AM | #13 |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
|
Hi Philechat.. Good point. It is possible I guess that one may register unconsciously a foreign language. I doubt it can lead to fluency though... I learned 3 foreign languages, two I can claim to be fluent and I must tell you that it necessitated full conscious awareness to acquire that knowledge on my part. Years of study and years of total immersion in the culture which uses that language.
The times I have been exposed to what is called " speaking in tongues", I never heard a known language. It was more so a mono syllabic repetitive language that I could not identify as a known tongue. The closest I came to a known language is that it phoneticaly resembles hebrew or arabic. Having studied linguistics, I cannot help but pay attention to the structure of a language. Even though I am a christian I cannot support the claim that the speaking in tongues is a supernatural phenomenon. But the fact that I found the same patterns and phonetical resemblance in many individuals located in various areas who had no way to communicate with one another is what I cannot explain in a rational manner. It always sounds the same no matter where I was and who was "speaking in tongues". The propagation of a language necessitates communication between individuals. How that mysterious tongue can have similarities within groups of people who do not communicate with one another and are of different native languages or cultures is what gives me the sense that it could be " supernatural". How the same sounds can be echoed and sounds formed perfectly by vocal organs not trained to form that sound... it defies anything I have studied. I do not know if you can speak other languages but it takes some training of the vocal organs to form certain sounds alien to our native language. For example, I have found when I teach french to an anglophone that forming both the French sounds " u" and " r" necessitates exercises almost similar to speech therapy. It simply does not fit what I have experienced in terms of teaching phonetics as I was able to hear the same sound alien to that native coming from the mouth of another native. One may explain the phenomenon by saying that it propagated via medias and people started to imitate one another consciously. But it happens even in remote areas of the world where medias have no impact on people. And it still does not explain the formation of sounds which would normaly require a new conditionning of the vocal organs. Maybe someone in this forum who may have some linguistic knowledge has some suggestions to share. |
01-26-2003, 08:05 AM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
I am (or at least was) a professional academic linguist. I am aware of one study, done by an American linguist, which showed that phenomena of glossolalia (speaking in tongues) possessed on average even less phonemes than Hawaiian, which is difficult.
Meaning that glossolalia is simply repetitive random connections of mostly vowels, with only a few consonants included, and no great information transmission whatsoever. BTW, that linguist was a Christian who did not deny there might be some spiritual or other validity to the whole experience; she simply though. after stringent analysis of many, many utterences, could not find any meaningful signal in it all. |
01-26-2003, 12:23 PM | #15 | |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
|
Quote:
Could the similarities I noticed in the repetitive phonemes among various individuals not connected, be the product of self invented language where we will find a choice of vowels and consonnants based on what the individual is most familiar with? The letter "Z" for example is not so used in certain languages... therefor maybe "B" would be the better choice. I noticed the reoccurance of the sound " sh" for example. Very common in English. Ditto French. Italian. Arabic. It would be interesting to conduct the following experiment to determine if the individual invents the "tongue" thru some type of transe still using the same sound pattern as his native language or if the individual is actualy using his subconscious with the ability to produce sounds not familiar to his native language. It would take a few volunteers from different cultures and to ask them to invent a language following the same mono syllabic and phoneme pattern as glossolalia( people who never heard glossolalia before of course). See if the same similarities occur. They would also have to follow the same rythm which is usualy very rapid. It is interesting also that "tongues" do not have a written expression. Any thought on that? A bit off topic but since I have a linguist willing to discuss "shop", were you familiar with Esperanto? |
|
01-26-2003, 01:22 PM | #16 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
01-26-2003, 01:39 PM | #17 | |
Talk Freethought Staff
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
|
Quote:
Ha... the wisedom of Paul insisting that there be one person at a time speaking in tongues with one interpreter at a time. ( ref. Cor). I guess he was aware that multiple interpretations would result in confusion. Those folks ought to follow the "rules".... |
|
01-26-2003, 02:01 PM | #18 | ||||
Contributor
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Buggered if I know
Posts: 12,410
|
Quote:
FYI, most phonemes in the rather large body of utterences she recorded were from familiar speech --- no-one seemed to come out, for example, with Abkhazian consonants (Abkhazian is a language remotely related to Georgian, another Transcaucasian language, and hardly ever appears in the mass media of Western countries). A pity ! Quite boring, in fact. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You can transcribe glossolalia in the standard linguistic phoneme (IPA) transcription symbols. I have encountered Esperanto, and a couple of other invented languages, but I do not actually speak them. Esperanto is heavily based on the Romance languages (French, Latin etc.) and therefore is rather boring for me, since I --- like other academic research linguists ---- prefer to examine languages from several different families at once, and not only Indo-European. |
||||
01-26-2003, 03:27 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
|
At my mom's 10000+ strong Charismatic church they just make one syllable noises like, la la la la ah ah ah ab ab ka ka ka la la la da da da da ba ba ba ba, seriously.
|
01-26-2003, 03:40 PM | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The first page of "Finnigans Wake" is full of it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|