Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
04-14-2003, 05:36 PM | #11 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunnyvale,CA
Posts: 371
|
Yeah, Mageth,
I concede your point about the indifference from the military/adminisration in regard to concern as to the effects of launching a nuclear weapon on a civilian population. Pretty ugly. But my argument is that in the context of the times it would be astonishing that such a weapon would not be used given all the years of war and suffering and propaganda that the population had endured. Therefore, the question is not really "Why Did We Drop the Bomb?" but rather, "What would have convinced us not to drop the Bomb?" Funny, years later men who were assigned to "clean" off the nukes navy vessels off the atolls dies of all kinds of cancer. I don't think that was forseen either. |
04-14-2003, 05:42 PM | #12 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA expat, now living in France
Posts: 1,153
|
How would you like a nuclear bomb dropped on your town?
|
04-14-2003, 05:44 PM | #13 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
But my argument is that in the context of the times it would be astonishing that such a weapon would not be used given all the years of war and suffering and propaganda that the population had endured.
I think that's a valid consideration. One thing many sometimes forget in this argument is that we have the advantage (or disadvantage) of a hindsight view of the decision through the fog of 45 years of Cold War, nuclear proliferation, and the effects of the decision both on the civilian population of Japan and on the world in general. Truman did not have that hindsight to work with, and was therefore basically flying by the seat of his pants. |
04-14-2003, 05:46 PM | #14 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
How would you like a nuclear bomb dropped on your town?
This is but an emotional appeal. Who here has said they like nuclear bombs and what they do to people or towns??? |
04-14-2003, 06:11 PM | #15 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middletown, CT
Posts: 7,333
|
Quote:
|
|
04-14-2003, 06:39 PM | #16 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA expat, now living in France
Posts: 1,153
|
Quote:
|
|
04-14-2003, 06:42 PM | #17 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Well, that may or may not be true, but it's hardly a valid argument when discussing an event that took place some 58 years ago.
|
04-14-2003, 08:09 PM | #18 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Grand Junction CO
Posts: 2,231
|
Re: Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings
Quote:
Terrorism is unethical. That said, I do not claim that we "shouldn't" have dropped the bombs. Hindsight is too easy; second-guessing is a fool's game; and sometimes we have to choose the lesser of evils. |
|
04-14-2003, 08:40 PM | #19 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: USA expat, now living in France
Posts: 1,153
|
Quote:
|
|
04-14-2003, 08:59 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burbank
Posts: 758
|
unfortunately the surrender of japan was not forthcoming without it.
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|