Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-15-2002, 02:38 PM | #11 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 374
|
Walrus:
Quote:
It doesn't take a mathematician to guess that if something has fallen four feet towards your head, that it will probably continue for that extra foot right into it. Did you seriously just type that question?? After acting so condescending to Dr S no less. Sometimes you're good for a laugh, WJ. |
|
08-15-2002, 02:40 PM | #12 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 374
|
OJ:
Quote:
|
|
08-15-2002, 02:46 PM | #13 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: I've left FRDB for good, due to new WI&P policy
Posts: 12,048
|
Quote:
Long before we humans figured out why things fall, things did indeed fall. Experience allows people to dodge falling objects. Knowledge of gravity allows us to construct falling objects that don't hit the ground. |
|
08-15-2002, 02:49 PM | #14 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
|
I used to believe in "hostile spirits" as well until I spent several nights alone in an old house that groaned every couple of minutes or so. And it had nice, menacing trees in the yard that cast very ominous shadows through windows via the moonlight.
I really like Doctor S's summary of the beta male creating a problem then "solving" the problem to gain preferential treatment. Sounds alot like eternal damnation solved by eternal salvation. |
08-15-2002, 03:46 PM | #15 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
|
Devilnaut,
Well, one reason is the subject of this thread--the origin of religion. Religion started out as an attempt to negotiate with friendly and hostile spirits, and this fact makes much more sense if friendly and hostile spirits exist. <a href="http://catholiceducation.org/articles/religion/re0018.html" target="_blank">In this essay,</a> Peter Kreeft gives some other reasons to believe in hostile spirits. The best reason, I think, is what he says about the making of The Exorcist. Not being a Christian, I can't agree with everything Kreeft says, but I have a lot of respect for him. |
08-15-2002, 03:52 PM | #16 |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Deep in the heart of mother-lovin' Texas
Posts: 29,689
|
Religion started out as an attempt to negotiate with friendly and hostile spirits, and this fact makes much more sense if friendly and hostile spirits exist.
Why does it make much more sense? Since we have absolutely no evidence that friendly or hostile spirits exists (only people's superstitions), it makes more sense to me that someone invented the idea of spirits in the past, for reasons as explained in the OP or some other reason. [ August 15, 2002: Message edited by: Mageth ]</p> |
08-15-2002, 04:06 PM | #17 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On a sailing ship to nowhere, leaving any place
Posts: 2,254
|
"friendly and hostile spirits"
What are these spirits? What do they do? How does one perceive them? Spirits, according to the various mythologies I've read, are responsible for things such as wind, disease, inspiration, etc. Basically, all the things that happened that humans, throughout history, couldn't explain demonstrably. "I broke off this branch." - a human explaining why he has a twig in his hand. "Air spirits broke off that branch." - a human explaining why a twig broke off a tree while a strong wind was blowing. [ August 15, 2002: Message edited by: Demigawd ]</p> |
08-15-2002, 04:15 PM | #18 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A city in Florida that I love
Posts: 3,416
|
They are intelligent beings made up of something other than matter. They affect random events like the weather, the fortunes of disease organisms, and decisions that are made very quickly. They are perceived, more or less, with certain kinds of emotional or mental experience.
Your second paragraph is basically the refutation of God of the gaps. I started a thread today (that has gone unanswered so far ) which argues that there are other ways to interpret supernaturalism than God of the gaps (and, of course, mine is more rational). I would certainly want someone to reply to it. [ August 15, 2002: Message edited by: Ojuice5001 ]</p> |
08-15-2002, 04:24 PM | #19 | |
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 106
|
Quote:
A false leopard-in this case hell after you are dead. And you are saved by a make believe god- saved after you are dead. HA! Notice that you have no way to know that you are in danger unless the pseudo-alpha tells you. Likewise you have no way to know that you have been rescued until he presents the bill. Things like the wind spirit you mentioned-you stop them from blowing down your house by sacrificing a pig. However it's the shaman (pseudo-alpha) who gets the pork chops. If you've ever seen the Vatican you know that people will pay good money to be saved from leopards that aren't really there. [ August 15, 2002: Message edited by: Dr S ]</p> |
|
08-15-2002, 04:56 PM | #20 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 374
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|