FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2003, 10:14 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 595
Default

Quote:
The main philosophical argument for the existance of a deity is, in my view, if God did not exist we would never mention Him.


This has to be by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard.

You forgot about the unicorns, etc. in Aquila's post. If they didn't exist, we wouldn't be discussing them, right?

BTW- it's existence, not existance. Otherwise the past- tense would be existad and that would be just plain nutty.
Sci_Fidelity is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 10:24 AM   #12
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 5,047
Arrow

Quote:
By that logic, then:
Zeus,Cerridwen, Cernunnos,The Morrigan,Hecate and Plush Cthulu exist.



Well, we're in deep milk duds now!
Ronin is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 10:38 AM   #13
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,460
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
No. They were all considered Gods. The fact that they are not is irrelevant.
Doesn't matter. If they didn't exist, then we wouldn't be talking about them, right? That was your argument for the existence of your deity, so when we apply it to other entities which we talk about then we must conclude that they also exist, or that the argument is flawed.

Which is it?

-Nick
I ate Pascal's Wafer is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 11:14 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Posts: 870
Default

It seems to me before you can begin such a discussion, you have to define what you mean by god.
paul30 is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 12:10 PM   #15
Contributor
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
Default Re: Re: Somebody help me, please!

malookiemaloo:
The main philosophical argument for the existance of a deity is, in my view, if God did not exist we would never mention Him.

A view almost too silly to be worth commenting on.

As far as I can see from the Sec. Web, the main pro-atheist argument is that God does not regulary make grandiose appearances on planet earth once a week or so.

And is that supposed to be impossibly difficult for an allegedly omnipotent being? And why is some alleged entity that hides all the time supposed to be worthy of worship?
lpetrich is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 03:47 PM   #16
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,082
Default Re: Re: Somebody help me, please!

Quote:
Originally posted by malookiemaloo
The main philosophical argument for the existance of a deity is, in my view, if God did not exist we would never mention Him.
Let me see if I understand you correctly.

You believe in Yahweh, Zeus, Apollo, Shiva, Vishnu, Buddah, Yoda, Athena, Bob, Eris, Satan, Square Circles, Jupiter, Unicorns, Voldemort, and thousands of other such beings?

They're all things that have been mentioned and discussed frequently.

According to you this is proof that they exist.

Would you care to retract your comment, or am I correct in assuming you believe all of the things listed above are real?

Given that you've claimed to believe that Zeus is a genuine God with an existance that is just as real as Jesus, can you explain why you don't worship him? Or do you worship him?

Still, if nothing else, your main reason to believe in God is incredibly weak - you don't even claim that there's actual observable evidence for his existance. This is quite impressive, and shows the true validity of your God better than anything I could have come up with.
orac is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 04:09 PM   #17
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 7,351
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by paul30
It seems to me before you can begin such a discussion, you have to define what you mean by god.
If you wait for someone to come up with a decent definition of "god", you'll never have the discussion at all. See:

Anyone, how vague is god?
Pyrrho is offline  
Old 04-30-2003, 07:26 PM   #18
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,671
Default

You need to back up and read Freud, Jung, Joseph Campbell, and guys like that. Find out the definitions of ritual, myth, symbol, sign, worship, god, spirituality, primitive religion, and religion.
Opera Nut is offline  
Old 05-01-2003, 05:24 AM   #19
Regular Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: glasgow, scotland
Posts: 356
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sci_Fidelity


This has to be by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard.

You forgot about the unicorns, etc. in Aquila's post. If they didn't exist, we wouldn't be discussing them, right?

BTW- it's existence, not existance. Otherwise the past- tense would be existad and that would be just plain nutty. [/B]

Yes, I suppose you are right now that I think about it!!

Sorry about the spelling.


m
malookiemaloo is offline  
Old 05-01-2003, 10:56 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 595
Default

Great. Now how about responding to the arguments.
Sci_Fidelity is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.