FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Today at 05:55 AM

View Poll Results: What language is spoken in Heaven?
Ancient Sumerian 0 0%
Aramaic 1 3.23%
Italian 1 3.23%
King James English 2 6.45%
Ebonics 10 32.26%
It don`t matter. God will unbabble our tongues and everyone will be able to understand everyone else regardless of the language they came into Heaven with. 5 16.13%
Upon arriving in Heaven everyone is taught a brand new universal "Heaven langauge".. 0 0%
People in Heaven don`t talk to each other. God has a "no talking" rule. 9 29.03%
Heaven is split up into nations just like Earth and people of different nationalities with different languages are kept seperated from each other by huge magic walls. 1 3.23%
People in Heaven know exactly what everyone else is thinking at all times so theres no need for words. 2 6.45%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-08-2003, 01:59 PM   #11
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sabine Grant
ok... fair enough. I think though if I had not mentionned anything some folks may have believed he did state that there is a no talking rule in Heaven.
Does it really matter what anybody thinks he said?
I think a "no talking in heaven " rule would have been one of the least ridiculous things he has said here.

I`m quite positive you`ll disagree with me though. And quick.
Yellum Notnef is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 02:08 PM   #12
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Luiseach
I like the word 'ridiculize'...it should be added to Heaven's dictionary... :-D
Forgive my French... ridiculiser. I tend to borrow words from my native language and smuggle them into english with a slight orthographic difference.
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 02:13 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: limbo
Posts: 986
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sabine Grant
Forgive my French... ridiculiser. I tend to borrow words from my native language and smuggle them into english with a slight orthographic difference.
French or English, I still like it... (and English is a most accommodating language)
Luiseach is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 02:18 PM   #14
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Fenton Mulley
Does it really matter what anybody thinks he said?
I think a "no talking in heaven " rule would have been one of the least ridiculous things he has said here.

I`m quite positive you`ll disagree with me though. And quick.
Fenton... I am always careful to not attribute to anyone thoughts they may have not expressed. Your opinion of anyone is your opinion. You can feed on any negative notions as much as you want and need. However I think it is only fair to restrain from quoting someone in their absence , quote which may result in leading other individuals to think negatively of that person... especialy when the quote is presented as an attribution of thoughts to the person which that person may not have expressed.
I do care about how any participant is described in his absence especialy when it can lead others to negative thinking. I think it is a matter of being simply fair.
I rest my case.
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 02:46 PM   #15
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Gone
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sabine Grant
Fenton... I am always careful to not attribute to anyone thoughts they may have not expressed. Your opinion of anyone is your opinion. You can feed on any negative notions as much as you want and need. However I think it is only fair to restrain from quoting someone in their absence , quote which may result in leading other individuals to think negatively of that person... especialy when the quote is presented as an attribution of thoughts to the person which that person may not have expressed.
I do care about how any participant is described in his absence especialy when it can lead others to negative thinking. I think it is a matter of being simply fair.
I rest my case.
I didn`t qoute Radorth. Not only that but I put this thingy right after my comment.

I think most people know a joke when they see one. You happen to be one of the few who don`t.

Btw,
I`m glad to see ebonics is still in the lead.
Yellum Notnef is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 03:14 PM   #16
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

All that time I was fooled in believing that indicated a joke or friendly wink sort of like... " you know I do not really mean what I said". The " big grin" did not quite illustrate to me the intention that " you know I do not really mean what I said".

For some reason a grin does not have the positive and engaging effect a wink has. But it is only my perception... of course.

And you did quote Rad as having been the reason for putting " no talking rules" in your pole when Amie asked.

About ebonics... will it apply to the native Africans from my beloved native continent?
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 03:18 PM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Talking

OK, who are the other clowns who voted for Ebonics? At least I have the excuse of living in L.A.

Hey, I honestly thought rediculize was a real George W. word. Kind of like Blesserize.
Mad Kally is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 03:20 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 699
Default

<- ebonics
beoba is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 03:36 PM   #19
Talk Freethought Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 32,364
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Mad Kally
OK, who are the other clowns who voted for Ebonics? At least I have the excuse of living in L.A.

Hey, I honestly thought rediculize was a real George W. word. Kind of like Blesserize.
I really meant to write " to ridicule"... I just checked the definition in the American Heritage Dictionary.
" words or actions intended to evoke contemptuous laughter at or feelings toward a person or thing".

I guess now everyone can understand what I meant.....
Sabine Grant is offline  
Old 02-08-2003, 03:37 PM   #20
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LALA Land in California
Posts: 3,764
Default

Quote:
Sabine:
About ebonics... will it apply to the native Africans from my beloved native continent?



Of course not! It's American. Do they call it knocking boots there?
Mad Kally is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.