Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
02-09-2003, 09:30 AM | #21 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
Quote:
Rad |
|
02-09-2003, 09:46 AM | #22 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the peach state ga I am a metaphysical naturalist
Posts: 2,869
|
Quote:
Rad you posted alot of crap, the response was pointing out that it was just that crap. strawmen and lies, ignoring everyone else's points. |
|
02-09-2003, 10:33 AM | #23 | |
Contributor
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 16,829
|
Quote:
|
|
02-09-2003, 10:34 PM | #24 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,872
|
I already did. He said several places what discoveries, or lack thereof would be "fatal to my theory." I then posted the exact evidence found which he said would prove fatal. Then the atheists started saying "Well nobody said Darwin was right about everything." And "well OK there were some bugs to work out."
It's as laughable as the JMer' theories that change weekly. What's the latest? Is it that Paul wrote Acts in 150 AD, and Luke was really a female named James? It's the same Mars Hill bull- all kinds of "new" theories based on nothing, or even contradictory evidence. Rad |
02-10-2003, 03:59 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
|
Good grief, the dishonesty continues.
First of all, your entire point, Radorth, was based on quotes of Darwin taken out of context. Secondly, as has been pointed out numerous times, the theory of evolution doesn't dogmatically require that Darwin be right about everything. (What's remarkable, though, given how much we didn't know 150 years ago, is how much Darwin did get right.) But then again, you've proven you know jack-shit about science too many times to count already on these forums, so it's not surprising that you don't understand this. So every time you repeat your ramblings about what Darwin said, you make yourself look that much more of a fool - or a liar. (The question is, is Radorth Lord, Liar, or Lunatic? I think we can rule out 'Lord'. ) |
02-10-2003, 04:09 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Deployed to Kosovo
Posts: 4,314
|
I say we let the gentle reader decide, eh? Here. The reader can see for himself how Radorth's every post in that thread was summarily dismantled. The reader can see for himself how Radorth tucked tail and ran.
|
02-10-2003, 06:16 AM | #27 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,759
|
Quote:
|
|
02-10-2003, 08:07 AM | #28 |
Regular Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Void
Posts: 396
|
Sheesh. Some people.
You know, Einstein's Theory of Relativity has parts of it that have been demonstrated to be incorrect in their ability to describe some aspects of spacetime and the nature of the universe. Does that mean that all of the Theory of Relativity is completely incorrect? Does that mean that "E" does not necessarily equal mass multiplied by the square of the speed of light? Does that mean that Physics, as a field, is wholly and utterly incorrect simply because one groundbreaking member of that field was found to have been mistaken about a number of things? Huh. There are a lot of engineers out there that are running reactors right now that need to have some stuff explained to them then, because by Radorth's "logic", none of those cores should function at all... :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: |
02-10-2003, 03:06 PM | #29 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Madison WI USA
Posts: 3,508
|
Hey Radorth, it also says in the Bible, and I quote verbatim:
Quote:
|
|
02-10-2003, 09:24 PM | #30 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 4,666
|
Quote:
May I plaigerize? Pretty please? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|