Freethought & Rationalism ArchiveThe archives are read only. |
08-09-2002, 05:15 AM | #21 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: US
Posts: 76
|
MadMorgan,
Let's not forget the girls. They might benefit from a first experience with 20 somethings. Nyx |
08-09-2002, 01:11 PM | #22 |
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: northern suburbs of Toronto, Canada
Posts: 401
|
1. In Canada, alchohol can be drunk in the home. No reason to change this system.
2. I'm going to wait until I personally know more before passing judgement on this. 3. Never. 4. I'm assuming you mean currently illegal drugs. They should stay illegal-no need to change this. 5. Same as #2. 6. Age should not be a criterion in deciding who can vote. We need better methods for preventing people from being coerced in a particular direction. Also, "children" pay taxes and should vote. 7. As long as they are capable and determined to be able, according to driver's tests, anyone should be able to drive. That being said, driver's tests should be more stringent. --Yelyos |
08-09-2002, 01:25 PM | #23 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: my mind
Posts: 5,996
|
All the question except the one for voting are irrelevant. Parents should be free to decide what is good or bad for their children, not the state.
And I agree, the voting age should be lowered, not that it will matter much anyway, people are already pretty apathetic about today world political systems. But that is off topic. |
08-09-2002, 04:04 PM | #24 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|