Liquidrage

Peter do you have to ruin every thread by preaching?

We already are familiar with your book.
Your quotes mean nothing. If someone found a 2500 year old document about Zeus that read,
"There are many false god but Zeus is the one. All other gods are false", would you switch?

I find only idiocy in your prattle.

Peter Edward Faulkner

I find it rather informative to get a perspective from the source.


Dan 7:18 But the saints of the most High shall take the kingdom, and possess the kingdom for ever, even for ever and ever.


Dani 7:18 mais les saints du Très-Haut recevront le royaume, et ils posséderont le royaume éternellement, d'éternité en éternité.

[ November 03, 2002: Message edited by: Peter Edward Faulkner ]</p>

Peter Edward Faulkner

And after they get done claiming their religion is not actually a religion, but a relationship, they will then go on to claim that evolution is a religion. Abacus


evolution


concept which embodies the belief that existing animals and plants developed by a process of gradual, continuous change from previously existing forms. This theory, also known as descent with modification, constitutes organic evolution. Inorganic evolution, on the other hand, is concerned with the development of the physical universe from unorganized matter

The Canadian Encyclopedia Plus Copyright © 1995 by McClelland & Stewart Inc.
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Fifth Edition Copyright © 1993 by Columbia University Press

[ November 03, 2002: Message edited by: Peter Edward Faulkner ]</p>

Liquidrage

Liquid 1:1 You don't seem to understand that myself and many other consider your source fiction. 2 Just because something is written on paper doesn't make it so. 3 Don't reply to this with another quote from the Bible or I swear I'll go nutty ape-shit and we'll all wind up in RRP

kctan

Jehovah = "the existing One"
1) the proper name of the one true God

2Th 2:3 exapatao me tis exapatao humas kata medeis tropos hoti ean me erchomai apostasia proton kai anthropos hamartia apokalupto huios apoleia.

2Th 2:4 ho antikeimai kai huperairomai epi pas lego theos e sebasma hoste autos hos theos kathizo eis naos theos apodeiknumi heautou hoti esti theos.

Fitted jebus to the letter doesn't it ?

(I think those french translation could be for a certain lady.)

Liquidrage

What is your point? At least this time you used a different source. I suppose in some ways that is a moral victory.

I would guess you are trying to use the word "belief" in your quote to show that evolution is a religion.

Though this isn't the case. I believe the Flyers will win their game on Tuesday. That is not a religion.
Look up <a href="http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=religion" target="_blank">religion</a> in a dictionary.

The key to communication is the ability to communicate. Please don't go around misusing or redefining common words to meet your agenda.

[ November 03, 2002: Message edited by: Liquidrage ]</p>

Peter Edward Faulkner

Liquid 1:3


You should try to exercise a higher degree of tolerence.

If only for the sake of the general perception of antichrists.

Peter Edward Faulkner

I would guess you are trying to use the word "belief" in your quote to show that evolution is a religion.


Wrong guess, posted that before I read your rant.

Do you know what a ranter is?

Philosoft

Right honorable, that McClelland & Stewart. No agenda there, no sir. Not only do they manage to use both creationist-referring-to-evolution buzzwords, "belief" and "theory," but they also completely obfuscate the issue by inventing a term, "inorganic evolution" that implies the "field-of-study" (development of the universe from unorganized matter??!! WTF?!) thus described is somehow related to biological evolution.

Truly a new level of dishonesty.

Liquidrage

Peter,

Well then by all means please let me know what the right "guess" would have been. Since you seem to be carrying on your tradition of cryptic posts who's meaning can only be guessed.