Dr Rick

Yes, Rad has been a bad boy, a very naughty boy; Rad is a terrible, unholy boy. The police should put the handcuffs on Rad.

...I go to their website, and they say I'm a real man, and they listen to me, and they like me, and that they wish that they could touch me.

I know because they show me pictures.

Daddy and grandpa think I'm wasting my money on the internet, too.

In fact, I can "get it" whenever I want; I just lock my bedroom door when I know mommy's busy making supper.

Sometimes, the choir-leader, after church practice, when we're alone...well, sometimes he reads to me and then punishes me.

I think about Hitler a lot; that's why I just brought up his name. I think about how he beats me.

My psychologist has the list, in case anyone is interested.

But what I didn't tell you about is my weakness for diapers.

I fantasize about Sabine almost as much as I fantasize about Hitler.

That, and the laws against beastiality are certainly what keep most people from responding to my scenarios with me.

hezekiah jones

...I go to their website, and they say I'm a real man, and they listen to me, and they like me, and that they wish that they could touch me.

rofl.
Is Jesus the only one that takes Radorth seriously?

Jayjay

Boohoo.

(Not that I agree with Fenton... I think that calling a christian a bad witness is way out of line.)

My mistake, apologies for that. (It turns out I was thinking about a thread where you said you would stop responding if other people started falling off. My selective memory conveniently forgot the conditional.)

Yet, when Bumble Bee Tuna did answer them, in a way consistent with how most people here think, and pointed out that out of the three scenarios only the first one applies to the real world, you just shrugged it off. But, now I'm just repeating what BBT told you already.

So what's your problem with atheists who give conditions for worshipping a Christian God, and point out that there is no such thing as far as the bible is concerned? You call this "whining and moaning", when in fact you'd be the first person to "whine and moan" exactly the same way (by rebelling against the Hindu pantheon) if you found out there was no Jesus to impute rightenousness on you or whatever.

Radorth

Re #1 Grudgemeister

Heh. They do it eveytime they impugn me, my motives, and misrepresent what I said, or what I did or did not do. But maybe the Rad police are just trying to drag me down to their level. So then I take it you don't think you're a better person than I am. That's an encouraging sign if so.

You're avoiding the issue, which is whether you agree with other skeptics that he was a Christian.

Re: Grudgemeister in training, who claims he's not going to bother anymore but talks about me in other threads instead. B, if you truly want to agree not mention each other again and ignore each other, I'm ready to start.

Yeah, "Rad made us do it." Funny how I responded whenever somebody made a serious point, isn't it?

What did you want, a big pat on the back? I am completely mystified as to why I should respond to a post I find no great fault with. You wanna play with the big kids, but not act like one.

"Rad makes us say these things."

Re: Dr Rick,

Speaking to the choir apparently, Grudgemeister #3 wins "Most Off-topic, Evasive and Non-responsive Post" of the month, and it's only the 3rd.

I'm downgrading Daggah to #4 for raising an intelligent thread-related question, failing to bring up ancient history, and not mentioning evolution.



Rad

Daggah

Well, we can only speculate, but if I were Jesus, I'd use my magical miracle power to smite Radorth, or at least break his fingers, so he couldn't keep driving all those atheists even further away from me with his pathetic apologetics.

I don't think even Jesus would take Radorth seriously, if he were around. Jesus would probably be too stricken with disgust at Radorth's dishonesty.

Radorth

Apology accepted. Thank you.

Huh? How can somethiing presented as hypothetical apply to the real world? He was more likely avoiding a response to scenarios which were clearly designed to get people to say just where they would draw the line. It also appears that some who whined the loudest about me not answering their questions, refused to answer at all. I wonder why that is.

I'm not clear on what your question is. You'd have to show me where I said they were whining when they were actually expressing a sincere and coherent condition. It's fine to set such conditions. That's exactly what I did before I became a Christian. But they seldom spell out the conditions very well so that one can argue point by point. My scenarios were in fact meant to get at exactly what those conditions would be, but most people stopped short of saying.

My friend, I assure you that if God did not impute righteousness in order to reconcile the contrary demands of justice and love, I would be no theist.

So ah, Fenton. I have a question. How am I a poorer witness, and a much poorer Christian than Jesus and the apostles? How do I compare to Paul in integrity, being in touch with reality, human kindness, etc?

Rad

Radorth

This is just another one of your gratuitous slanders Daggah, with no examples. You never give any. I challenge you to list three points I was dishonest about in the last month and let me answer.

You have to prove slander is true, but you haven't the integrity or the memory to do anything but make these kind of sweeping statements. Which of course makes you dishonest and a local gossip.

Rad

winstonjen

Because hypothetical scenarios are possibilities that could happen.

How do you know it was god that imputed 'righteousness' on you? How can you prove it wasn't something else, like the weed you probably were on at the time?

Yellum Notnef

No. People do not think they are holy for pointing out another persons wrong doings. Maybe thats how things work in your imaginary Christian world,but *I* certainly don`t feel "holy" or like a better person for pointing out your antics.

And how could anyone possibly drag you down any lower?


What question? Who here asked a question about Hitler?
I told you you`re the worst witness for Jesus I`ve ever seen. You came back and tried to pass the buck on Hitler by saying Hitler was a worse witness than you. (you must think pretty poorly of yourself if you can`t find anyone other than Hitler,but thats for another day)
I then told you that I`ve never seen Hitler witness and that Hitler isn`t here on II or anywhere else arguing for Jesus.
So the honor of "worst witness for Jesus that *I`ve* ever seen" still belongs to you.

Now suddenly out of nowhere I`m avoiding an unasked question about if Hitler was a Christian? I never said a damn thing about Hitler until you just brought him up,but lets see if your attempt to drag this off on a tangent works to your advantage....
A.) If Hitler WAS a Christian he wouldn`t be the worst witness for Jesus I`ve ever seen because I`ve never seen him witness. He`s not here racking up posts on this or any other message board.

B.) If Hitler WAS NOT a Christian he wouldn`t be a witness at all so he couldn`t possibly be the worst at it.

What was that you were saying?

winstonjen

"Nothing is beyond the LORD (argument ad Capslock )! He uses unbelievers to complete his 'grand plan'! :boohoo: