RED DAVE

To Cicero:

Don't sweat it. I've already been edited. It's a badge of honor in the struggle against these nazi swine. Sort of like going to jail during Vietnam.

RED DAVE

Blixy Sticks

Just who exactly are "these nazi swine?" Seems to me that the main culprit here is York, yet you allude to the plural.

Cicero

I don't think the moderator did it for political reasons...I really DID go overboard.

As for Nazi Swine, there is honor in opposing them by ANY means. The Nazis were the darkest chapter in human history (with Stalin being a very close second, simply due to motive). I have a visceral hatred of the Nazi ideology, and of those that support it.

I just have to keep my head about it a bit more, is all, I think.

Vicar Philip

While I certainly do not support any pro-Nazi movements, I'm just trying to keep the thread civil despite its decidedly UN-civil topic.

Vicar

Cicero

That's what I figured.

I have no problem whatsoever with the edit, and I appreciate the restraint in your response.

It is, however, my way to come down on Nazi sympathyzers, as York has freely admitted to being, like a ton of bricks. I will attempt to do so in a more appropriate matter...IE: The same vitriol, packaged in a more civil manner.

RED DAVE

From Blixy Stix:

I was speaking in general. On this thread, york.

Also, I didn't mean to imply that the edit that have been done were politically motivated. What I meant was that losing your temper at a nazi and having to be edited was cool.

RED DAVE

York

is there such a book in existance that both the pro-semites and anti-semites agree upon as being correct? from the things im reading its apparent that total numbers (example;6mill vs 3mill) and means of execution have been refuted. there were other accusations the nazis were using eletricity and fire to kill(jews) people. those seem to be untrue now??? i think fire and holocaust are actualy the 2 words that go hand in hand more acuratley. gas/holocaust seems to be an accepted slang.

i dont mind grabbing one book that the pro-semites and another book that the anti-semites each think is good. however if there were one book that showed whats been agreed upon as not true then leaving only whats left to digest would be the best.

edit:> gah , im a nazi swine lol. considering the emotional side of this thread i will let that roll off my back :-)

i please request to not be called a gentile again. gentile is a derogatory word from a supremicist holy book. going back to my original thread asking if the jewish religion is evil i agree with the people that said all religions are evil so that makes the talmud no worse or better then the bible, koran etc.

JamesKrieger

York, I suggest reading Michael Shermer's book "Why People Believe Weird Things".

York

the title of that book sounds interesting. its not about the holocauast or ww2 in particular is it? is the book pro-semite or antisemite?

to be fair i need a book that both sides consider the best.

livius drusus

York, I am confused by your use of "anti-semite" and "pro-semite". Anti-semites believe that Jews secretly retain malicious control of a wide variety of societal institutions and are therefore responsible for a wide variety of perceived social ills. Based on this fundamental belief, anti-semites advocate a wide range of reactions to the perceived threat. Some go for garden variety segregation. Some prefer extermination.

But there is no such thing as a pro-semite. Nobody thinks Jews are actually conspiring to ruin the world and is all for it. Nobody goes to pro-Jewish conspiracy rallies. We just don't buy the anti-semites fundamental assertion. Period. Calling people who aren't anti-semitic pro-semitic is like calling atheists Satanists. We don't hold the opposite belief. We hold none.

Now, if you have evidence of any Jewish conspiracies, I beg you to produce them. Not assertions. Not groundless theories based on racialist propaganda. Evidence. Links to some documentary or physical evidence, for instance, as has been provided on this thread for the existence of the Holocaust.