FRDB Archives

Freethought & Rationalism Archive

The archives are read only.


Go Back   FRDB Archives > Archives > IIDB ARCHIVE: 200X-2003, PD 2007 > IIDB Philosophical Forums (PRIOR TO JUN-2003)
Welcome, Peter Kirby.
You last visited: Yesterday at 05:55 AM

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-24-2002, 06:23 AM   #161
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by dk:
<strong>

dk dk: The scientific evidence says 65,000,000 adults in the USA suffer an incurable STD. Only a nut cake pits evidence against science, in fact the evidence contains the science.
[ October 23, 2002: Message edited by: dk ]</strong>
Yes, and I am one of them. Sorry for those of you who this is TMI, but I am really sick of this.

I have HPV, I got it from my WIFE. After a decade of premarital sex, marital sex with my first wife, sex with my mistress, then sex with others, then marriage again, I finally got an STD within the holy bonds of matrimony.

You know what. It doesn't affect me at all. It may take ten years off my life by increasing my susceptibility to cancer, but there is a vaccine for HPV being developed as we speak, and cancer is coming closer to a cure every year. Hell, I work at a Med Center that has developed a 99.9% effective AIDS vaccine that the FDA won't approve because it uses live virus. (they're working on the dead virus version, and have millions in grant money for the research)

And since most of your precious 65 million adults are, just like me, carrying a disease that has vitually no effect on their lives, and may be essentially cured within the decade, what is your point?

These people are still capable of procreating, which is their only mission in life because that's all the species demands of us. I mean STD's are a reality, and as I said, even if my life is shortened, I wouldn't trade it for your life and another 30 years.
dangin is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 07:34 AM   #162
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Mayor of Terminus
Posts: 7,616
Post

Ya know what? It's just sex, people.

I find it very sad the hang-ups that Xianity implants into its cult members.
sentinel00 is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 08:54 AM   #163
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
Post

Quote:
In fact the government regulates cars, airplanes, buildings, air quality, and contagious disease to control the risks. Are you suggesting the government should regulate reproduction?

People need to evaluate the evidence, and act responsibly, or the government will, or the nation will be ruined.


Are you under the impression that the government has not tried to regulate sex? What do you think laws against prostitution, pornography and sodomy are about? And it's worked so well. Almost as well as the war on drugs.

Quote:
the Catholic Church said from the beginning birth control would ruin people and be the cause of great suffering back in the 1960s. .


Yes, the worst thing to ever hit this country was women's ability to control their bodies.

The Catholic church's prohibition against birth control is anti environmental, misogynistic, cruel, and detrimental to the health and well being of the church's adherents. It condemns the poor to stay poor and ensures a steady flow of abused, unwanted, and neglected children. It also encourages abortion as desperate women turn to the procedure after their attempts at being a good catholic land them in an impossible position. The days of barefoot and pregnant are over for everyone except Catholics. I can think of nothing more pathetic.

Glory
Glory is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 09:20 AM   #164
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Middle, Kansas
Posts: 2,637
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Glory:
<strong>[/b]
Are you under the impression that the government has not tried to regulate sex? What do you think laws against prostitution, pornography and sodomy are about? And it's worked so well. Almost as well as the war on drugs.
Glory</strong>

Glory I wish there was a Graemlin that did the cabbage patch. I would have him dancing like crazy. What a great rebuttal. <img src="graemlins/notworthy.gif" border="0" alt="[Not Worthy]" />
dangin is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 10:27 AM   #165
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

Glory:
Quote:
I don't know. It seems it would depend on how large the non-dick object is. I'll say yes, you are a virgin if you have not been penetrated by a dick all other objects not withstanding. Any object of a certain width is going to cause discomfort, though. "Slender" tampons are made for virgins, generally. They look like "Virginia Slims".
Well, a few fingers for example - a few months of that and actual sex isn't necessarily such a big deal.
tronvillain is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 10:48 AM   #166
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: b
Posts: 673
Post

One can be slowly stretched, I suppose, but it doesn't really compare to the feeling of a dick. I was manually penetrated before I consented to penile penetration. The thing is an erect dick is a fairly solid collumn. Fingers move independantly and can adjust to the opening. It doesn't help as much as you might think. Another thing is that after the initial encounter, the pain returns momentarily upon each penetration. Basically, it hurts somewhat every time for a while. Only upon insertion, mind you. The pain abates almost immediately and sex is quite pleasurable from then on. At least, that was my experience.

BTW, I have had the pleasure of some very well endowed men and I have never slept with someone with a small dick. The two men who I have known the most are both quite thick. This probably made a difference as far as pain goes.

Glory
Glory is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 10:51 AM   #167
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 6,264
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by tronvillain:
<strong>Well, a few fingers for example - a few months of that and actual sex isn't necessarily such a big deal.</strong>
Don't tell my wife or I'll be out of a job.

I can't believe the turn this thread took. If you don't want to have premarital sex, don't. If you don't want your kids to have it, talk to them and hope for the best. If you want to regulate it, your crazy.

My only regret is being too shy to get it on with more people than I did. If that's wrong in your book, so what. It's your book, not mine.
ImGod is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 11:14 AM   #168
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portsmouth, England
Posts: 4,652
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Glory:
The two men who I have known the most are both quite thick. This probably made a difference as far as pain goes.
Funny how I read that totally the wrong way!

Amen-small-dick-Moses
Amen-Moses is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 12:09 PM   #169
Honorary Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the fog of San Francisco
Posts: 12,631
Post

Hi Amen-Moses,

It can be pretty painful to be around thick people of either sex.

cheers,
Michael
The Other Michael is offline  
Old 10-24-2002, 12:16 PM   #170
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5,658
Post

One can be slowly stretched, I suppose, but it doesn't really compare to the feeling of a dick. Glory:
Quote:
I was manually penetrated before I consented to penile penetration. The thing is an erect dick is a fairly solid collumn. Fingers move independantly and can adjust to the opening. It doesn't help as much as you might think. Another thing is that after the initial encounter, the pain returns momentarily upon each penetration. Basically, it hurts somewhat every time for a while. Only upon insertion, mind you. The pain abates almost immediately and sex is quite pleasurable from then on. At least, that was my experience.
Well, my experience in this area is limited to one relationship.
tronvillain is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:53 PM.

Top

This custom BB emulates vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.